Web creators are trying to share their knowledge and get supported while doing so”, tweeted Ben Goodger, a software engineer who helped create both Firefox and Chrome. “I get how this helps users. How does it help creators? Without them there is no web…” After all, if a web browser sucked out all information from web pages without users needing to actually visit them, why would anyone bother making websites in the first place?

Do you remember rss feed aggregators and how they killed the web?

For decades, websites have served ads and pushed people visiting them towards paying for subscriptions. Monetizing traffic is one of the primary ways most creators on the web continue to make a living.

The AI won’t summarize subscribers only articles. In the end content creators have to focus on subscriptions and less on advertisement revenue. Will this mean less content on the web? Yes of course. However, is this really a bad thing? Less clickbait nonenews articles, less copy&paste repetitions etc.

Why not aim for the head? Is it too hard to hit?

Hier geht es wohl mehr um raffgierige Professoren. Auch bei ausreichenden staatlichen Mitteln hätten die das durchgezogen.

“non-human animals” - very strange wording

I’ve stopped listening to my wine. It kept telling me to kill people.

Bayer hier: Wir schicken Euch FW und CSU und behalten unseren Atommüll selbst. Herrje, wir nehmen dann sogar Euren.

Death is inevitable Jon.

Germany is 2nd highest spender on Ukraine which contradicts your oppiniin.

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/these-countries-have-committed-the-most-aid-to-ukraine

Poor Gendolfyn trying to milk a male ent after mistaking it as a female.