Avatar

meteokr

meteokr@community.adiquaints.moe
Joined
4 posts • 318 comments
Direct message

I remember the very strange control scheme it had on PS4 I think it was? You couldn’t bind your abilities to any button, just specific combinations like Square+Left, but not Square+Right, something like that. I wonder if they’ve changed that in the newer ones.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I only just found out about it and wanted to share since I havent heard any dicussion around this style of game. It looks fun, but I havent had a chance to sink much time into it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I can’t seem to find it, but I think it was James Gosling, where he was blocked from reviewing code at Google because he hadn’t gone through the company’s approval process. I hope this wasn’t a myth I’ve been carrying on for this long.

permalink
report
reply

Right, I did hear about that lawsuit way back when, I just didn’t know of these types of consequences. Very appreciated, especially the sources.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I really appreciate you linking studies about this topic, as finding this kind of research can be daunting. Those looks like really interesting reads.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Is this for hardware RAID controllers, or have you experience software RAID like LVM or ZFS exhibiting the same drop out behavior? I personally haven’t but it be nice to look out for future drives.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Drive 1: A, Drive 2: 1/2 A, Drive 3: 2/2 A. Drive 2 + Drive 3 = Drive 1. Hmm that would only be one set of the party though. So you could also add 1/2 of A to Drive 1, and 2/2 to Drive 2 so that the parity on Drive 1 + Drive 2 = Drive 3. Which is extremely silly, and doesn’t make a lot of sense to use in the real world.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Oh thanks for the tip! I’ve edited my comment to reflect the minimum of 4 drives for a RAID6 array.

I’ve not used RAID6 for a small array like that before so I didn’t know it had a conventional lower limit. From the technical sense it doesn’t have to have 4 drives, it just wouldn’t make any sense to use it that way so I see why software wouldn’t support such a use case.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yes their failure rates are usually a bit higher, but usually less than the increase in rate from using more than one disk instead. A bit of math can be done using Backblaze’s disk failure rate data to get a reasonable approximation of the overall risk of failure.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Exactly! RAID gives you the breathing room to react to the partial failure of the full RAID array disk. I appreciate your understanding.

permalink
report
parent
reply