![User's banner](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemm.ee%2Fapi%2Fv3%2Fimage_proxy%3Furl%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Flemmy.dbzer0.com%252Fpictrs%252Fimage%252F70ba0ff1-47d7-4382-a32f-c4a210af9ccf.jpeg&w=2048&q=75)
![Avatar](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemm.ee%2Fapi%2Fv3%2Fimage_proxy%3Furl%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Flemmy.dbzer0.com%252Fpictrs%252Fimage%252Fe36d4c73-83c0-4288-bda0-aaf17191fbb5.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
![Avatar](/_next/image?url=%2Flemmy-icon-96x96.webp&w=3840&q=75)
stebo
stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined
5 posts β’ 1K comments
π΄π’π£π΅πΈπ¦
1 point
in me_irl@lemmy.worldβ’me_irl
My issue is mostly with image search results. DDGβs images tend to be less relevant than Googleβs. DDG also lacks βsmartβ results (idk the official term).
For example when you search βrng 25β on Google, it will immediately present you with a random number between 1 and 25. On DDG you have to click on one of the search results and then use some website to generate the number.
Or when searching for the results of a soccer game, Google will immediately present all the stats to you, while on DDG you will only find some articles about it.
Of course it really depends on the kind of search and Iβm sure DDG will regularly have better results than Google too.