Wasn’t even close. 60/40.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
100 points

Who votes against this? Really!

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Missouri voted to ban it 😭

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

you would think even If you hated Harris you would at least vote for more dinner options.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

People who read the heavily biased voter’s pamphlet and didn’t use critical thinking

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

What does it say?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Many pages of testimonials (fearmongering) about it being a bad idea. I only skimmed it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Well they voted so now they never will have to use it I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

People who want their party to stay in power

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

They still could?

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

yeah they could but now they will.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

with other voting systems, third parties could gain more power (as intended), which means that the current duopoly would lose power, and they don’t want that

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I don’t know anything about the campaign in Oregon, but most people are scared of things they aren’t familiar with.

Also I’m guessing neither party really supported this much, since they benefit from first-past-the-post.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Wonder what the campaign against it was. This seems like a easy win. It’s not even a religious thing like pro-choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Probably just a bunch of bullshit falsehoods, look at the campaign against issue 1 in Ohio. It was a change to the state constitution to put a citizen run commission in place to draw maps for voting districts and Republicans ran a campaign that was just straight up lying about what the issue was about. Then even threw misleading ballot language on the ballot, I doubt anyone read the ballot language though because it was a small novel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Politics (especially among republicans) has become a bit religious, so it’s not really THAT different I guess

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Nevadan here, ranked choice was on our ballot too. The against campaign was essentially “vote no on prop 3, it’s cheating”.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 470K

    Comments