I agree, the inherit fragmentation in the fediverse architecture has a certain negative impact on the microblogging experience for me (but I still won’t go back to a centralized platform ever again), but for Lemmy/kbin it fits perfectly. Link aggregation sites are already fragmented into separate communities by design.

Posting and commenting with a language tag fails for me every time for some reason, on every device and browser I’ve tried. So until that bug is fixed I just have to skip it 🤷🏻‍♂️

Doesn’t this apply regardless of whether the owner is the government or a private organization? All types of owners have their pros and cons, so I’d prefer a healthy mix so that users can pick the one they prefer.

There is also a need for governments to setup their own instances for their employees and institutions to avoid them having to sign up to a third party service if their work involves communicating on the fediverse, which also makes it clear that messages sent from this instance are official government communication (like governments have done with email for a long time). That’s how the EU’s Mastodon instance is setup: https://social.network.europa.eu/about

I think you can just search for the https url directly since both Mastodon and Lemmy have WebFinger support.

According to the most official resource I can find for now, only users that share your instance: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/pull/2128

It can indeed be complex. It depends on what type of law it is, in this case it’s a regulation so there is no need for countries to ratify it:

Regulations

Regulations are legal acts that apply automatically and uniformly to all EU countries as soon as they enter into force, without needing to be transposed into national law. They are binding in their entirety on all EU countries.

https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-making-process/types-eu-law_en

The Beehaw admins have just been doing exactly what they said they would in their signup page and community guidelines, yet a large number of people seem to have gotten surprised that they kept their word.

Not sure if I agree; sustainably can be different things for different people. For some it might be that the platform has a large number of users, but for Beehaw it is to have a safe community without bigots and trolls. It’s not sustainable for targeted individuals if they are met with hate speech, racism, transphobia etc every time they visit social media.

The Beehaw about pages explain their philosophy in more detail: https://beehaw.org/post/439918