You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-50 points

I never claimed that her oppinions were all wrong, she could just have stayed outside the discussion and kept focus on the environmental issues.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate change is an ecological, social and economical issue. You cannot reduce it to either dimension.

And you cannot solve climate change without adressing the social injustices in our societies that are excarberated by climate change, in the same way you cannot keep the economy afloat without adressing climate change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
-31 points

Climate change is the absolute most critical issue humanity faces today.

It has to take priority over everything else.

This means building nuclear powerplants as soon as possible to enable us to close coal, gas and oil plants, it means building winmills on indegious land if that is the best place to build them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

How about we tear down your home and neighborbood and build a windfarm over it? You will also not be compensated in any way or enough. I accept no arguments here, this is literally what you’re saying is okay to do to someone else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

You’re absolutely right and don’t deserve the animosity you’re getting in this thread.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points
*

It’s not that big of a deal

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I don’t think it matters. People can voice their opinion on other subjects without discrediting their opinion on climate change. This article isn’t even about Greta Thunberg’s other non-climate protests, so why are you taking focus away from environmental issues?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Environmentalism without class struggle is just gardening (Chico Mendes)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I disagree that it is “just gardening”, it can absolutely have a huge impact.

However I do realize that the upper classes also pollute far, far more than the lower classes.

My point is that if there is a point where there is a big project that would benefit the environment, and only affect the people a small ammount while loosing a lot of potential if it was built somewhere else, then the people living in the area should not get to stop the project. Climate change will cause far, far, far more problems than the small problems that a wind farm will cause.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes, however there are better ways to go about stealing other peoples land to save us all. Compromises will need to be made, and ones that don’t entirely fuck over the poor need to be fought for.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Europe

!europe@feddit.de

Create post

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 3.2K

    Posts

  • 34K

    Comments

Community moderators