1.7K

consider the implications for a post scarcity future(slrpnk.net)

posted
by
Avatar
stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net
in
Avatar
solarpunk@slrpnk.net
398 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
DogWater@lemmy.world
18 points

You can’t just say battery. There’s tons of energy storage that isn’t chemical based. Thermal sand batteries, pumping hydro up a hill, flywheel energy storage, etc.

Energy storage doesn’t inherently mean pollution

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Daft_ish@lemmy.world
7 points

I can only assume op meant a lithium ion battery. Based on context.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
DogWater@lemmy.world
3 points

Yeah, the cobalt and lithium is quite nasty to mine

permalink
report
parent
reply

Solarpunk

!solarpunk@slrpnk.net

Create post

The space to discuss Solarpunk itself and Solarpunk related stuff that doesn’t fit elsewhere.

What is Solarpunk?

Join our chat: Movim or XMPP client.

Community stats

  • 980

    Monthly active users

  • 635

    Posts

  • 7.2K

    Comments

Community moderators