Trump’s defense team has moved for a mistrial over Stormy Daniels’ testimony

“We move for a mistrial based on the testimony this morning,” defense attorney Todd Blanche said following the lunch break.

“The guardrails by this witness answering questions by the government were just thrown to the side,” Blanche said.

“There is no remedy that we can fashion … to unring this bell,” Blanche said about the impact of Daniels’ testimony.

Blanche argued the prosecutors wanted to embarrass Trump and inflame the jury and was far afield from a case about falsification of business records.

“She talked about a consensual encounter with President Trump that she was trying to sell,” Blanche said. “We heard a completely different story.”

Blanche argued that the testimony regarding condoms, being “blacked out” and and the “power dynamic” prejudiced the jury.

“This has nothing to do with the reason why we’re here,” Blanche said. “How can you un-ring a bell?”

The prosecution pushed back.

“Her account completes the narrative that precipitated the falsification of business records,” Hoffinger said. “It is precisely what the defendant did not want to become public.”

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
272 points
permalink
report
reply
74 points

I have a feeling he doesn’t have the best lawyers representing him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
81 points
*

“I was surprised that there were not more objections,” from the defense team he added. “At one point, the court … objected, because there was no objection coming from the defense.”

Either they are bad lawyers or they were strategically withholding their objections in order to file the mistrial motion. I fully expect this to be brought up again in an appeal, assuming Trump loses the case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

Convicted defendents in New York stay in prison during the appeal process. But of course we wont see that fucking happen because money reasons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

May it be too late for CheeseTurd by then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Can they file for a miss trail on the grounds that they themselves didn’t do the thing that’s expected of them in the time it was expected for them to do it.

Surely a lawyer can’t deliberately do a bad job, and then file for a mistrial.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That’s exactly what they were aiming for. It was their hail Mary because they know they don’t have an actual defense

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Yes, but also in their defense they don’t have the best client. It’s like they deserve each other.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

I’ve been following this trial very closely. Trump is the problem. He demands that his lawyers challenge everything very aggressively. He is enraged if his counsel accepts even trivial facts that make no difference either way. The bigger question is why they put up with his tantrums.

Money, probably…

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

He’s not gonna pay. He’ll say he lost so why pay. He’s got almost 500 million on bond for business fraud, 5 million for rape of Ms. Carroll, I think I’m missing another big one, and he’s freaking out at donors for not giving enough.

He’s got no field offices set up and only really doing campaign rallies, if you don’t count the desperate emails begging for donations. The only thing keeping his “campaign” going right now is the cult.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

If he paid lawyers, he might get good ones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

“But Merchan says he was also surprised there were not more objections from the defense and that, at one point, he stepped in of his own accord to restrict Daniels’ testimony.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2024/may/07/donald-trump-hush-money-trial-fine-gag-order-violations-live?page=with:block-663a734d8f08de1164c8978e&filterKeyEvents=false#liveblog-navigation

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Blanche was actually a pretty respected prosecutor turned defense attorney, its surprising he took the case unless he wanted to get out of law and this was his swansong before transitioning to some sweet talkinghead gig or other well-paid right-wing political operative role

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Blanche used to be a respected lawyer. I hope the payday was enough to pay for the reputational damage he’s taking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yeah historically they like being paid and really aren’t jumping at the chance to do polarizing work for free

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

lol get fucked traitors

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Good!

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

I was gonna say, that’s hilarious but nah. I think that’s what the judge thinks as well.

Legally speaking that’s some bullshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Saving us clicks : many thanks :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

“I don’t believe we are at the point where a mistrial is warranted,” Merchan said.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 408K

    Comments