You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
16 points
*

Yes, that is the most likely outcome based on all available historical data.

But, I will say the DA and local court system don’t seem to be playing along with making it easy.

So, while money is a statistically significant predictor in these situations, it’s not providence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Good. They really should pin on the working conditions. These clowns over work and under staff and when something bad happensz it is always some nobody wage slave who is at fault.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

I agree, but I will say that the armorer was exceptionally negligent. Like, seriously went above and beyond to be unsafe in her role and her handling of the weapons.

But even though she does bear some responsibility, ultimately it was Baldwin’s fault. Not because he pulled the trigger, but because he was in charge of the conditions on set, was aware of all the safety concerns raised the crew, and he was responsible for keeping the completely unqualified armorer on the crew.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Exactly.

Armorer was deff criminally negligent but she already got her time. Daddy “owner” being able to delay this shit is just another example of two justice systems for the club and the poors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Not because he pulled the trigger,

I am not willing to make that concession. Firearms are too simple to operate, and their risks too well known to argue that the person handling them can have zero responsibility for their operation.

If I pick up a knife on set, and I make no effort to verify its blade is dulled, or it’s retractable blade functional, I am responsible if I cut or stab someone with that knife.

If I pick up a hammer on set and bash someone over the head with it, not bothering to check that it’s a rubber hammer, I’m responsible for the injuries and damage I cause.

A gun is no different. If I haven’t verified that the gun is non-functional, I’m responsible for whatever comes out of the barrel. People have been killed by blanks, either fired at closer range than they are safe, or behind projectiles stuck in barrels.

The industry safety standard is summarized in 4 redundant rules, intended to prevent the discharge, or, if that fails, to ensure that discharge does not cause injury or unacceptable damage. A handler violating any of these rules is negligent, but they have to violate all of them before someone gets hurt.

Yes, the movie industry does, indeed, allow us to violate safety rules. Many industries do this with all sorts of dangerous operations.

But, we can do this only when the safety measure provided by that rule is replaced with an equivalent protection. Baldwin broke all four rules, and did not replace any of them with an equivalent measure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Was he actually in charge of conditions? Did he supervise the armorer or the AD who were responsible for handing him a loaded prop gun? I’ve never seen those claim proven anywhere, from what I I’ve seen he was an actor on the set and his producer title came primarily from his role in funding the production.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Movies and TV Shows

!moviesandtv@lemm.ee

Create post

A community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Be civil.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 966

    Posts

  • 9.5K

    Comments

Community moderators