If you saw this and thought it was horny, that might just be a you thing.
You expect me to look at a shirtless deer in denim jeans with with a buff chest and choker and a cheetah in a skintight uniform with big tiddies and a fat ass and supple thighs and not become aroused? Sicko
I think they got as far as the cheetah having breasts and have been conditioned by the internet that this means furry. Which is fair.
Let’s not forget this art is on the top of all time list of the furry_irl subreddit, and I even thought this was posted on a furry_irl communities before looking at this community’s name.
Nah, it’s pretty obvious the cheetah is wearing skin tight clothes for asthetic reasons. It might have been habit rather than design, but the artist definitely chose to draw titty-shaped torso rather than cop-shaped torso.
It’s not even fucking close either. They drew more titty shape than .
I dunno. I’m a woman and I didn’t notice the skin-tight thing until it was pointed out, but looking back at it, wouldn’t any clothes do that at 90 mph?
ACAB but it doesn’t look horny to me. She’s just woman-shaped to me.
wouldn’t any clothes do that at 90 mph?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Maybe, but it still managed to not look right despite that. It feels more like a failure to communicate speed with the art rather than intending horny anyways. That’s part of the problem though. The image looks horny first, and speedy second, or really even third.
I genuinely cannot believe that people still care about this in the year 2024.
Like, does anyone care if people draw animal people looking cute or sexy or just with human proportions or anything in between? Does it really bother anyone or is it just fun to try to bandwagon something that freaked some housewives out in the 90’s because some inside edition episode? It’s just drawings of animal characters like have been done for literal millenia. Imagine if some of the more “notorious” disney films came out today, people would lose their minds.
You can’t really compare real life people’s proportions to a cartoon of an anthropomorphic animal. To me its clear there was no intention for this image to be sexual at all. And believe me, if a furry wanted to draw something suggestive, there would be no discussion as to its horny status. They aren’t known for subtlety.
To me its clear there was no intention for this image to be sexual at all.
You’ve missed the point; it doesn’t matter if the author intended to draw a horny photo. I already agreed on that point in my above comment. The point is that the situation makes no sense for a horny image, but it still looks like one anyways.
You can’t really compare real life people’s proportions to a cartoon of an anthropomorphic animal.
I can when the animal has bigger tittys than most strippers do.
