You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
4 points

She was supposed to have the foresight to assume that the six months or so when they had a majority (when they passed ACA) was the last time Democrats would have the slightest hope of appointing a new supreme court justice.

What a fool she was! Not knowing the future!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

The house does not vote on judges. Only the Senate. Obama had a friendly Senate until Jan 2015. They could even have done it during the lame duck session. But in reality the Senate was widely forecasted to change control so she could have retired in the spring without controversy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

But they didn’t have the supermajority necessary to overcome a filibuster anymore. Even the cloture rule enacted in 2013 excluded supreme court nominations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And that would have been gone in a hot second if they blocked RBG’s replacement. They removed exactly what they needed to confirm judges.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Just Post

!justpost@lemmy.world

Create post

Just post something 💛

Community stats

  • 3.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 247

    Posts

  • 2.3K

    Comments