Almost 40,000 people registered to vote in the 48 hours after President Biden announced he was suspending his reelection campaign and endorsing Vice President Harris, Vote.org said.

Vote.org said 38,500 new voters registered, representing the largest number of registrations in a 48-hour period this election cycle.

Of the new voter registrations, 83 percent were from people aged 18-34, according to the voting registration nonprofit group.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments

I love how all of lemmy and many other places on the internet bitched and moaned about people calling for Biden to drop out. Then he did and the party is more energized than it has been in years, and actually has a chance to, ya know, defeat American fascism.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

People are acting like this is over…

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I remember a week or two ago, the same crowd calling Biden to quit also bitch about how Harris would be a horrible replacement with absolutely zero chance gaining any support.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

It turns out sending in a human instead of a vegetable might work out. That said, many complaints about her past as a “law and order” piece of shit are very valid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Even now, I have a few reservations. I hope it doesn’t get framed as some kind of DEI coronation. Well, I know the qons will try, but I mean, will it stick.

But if she’s the choice, she’s the choice. There are some alternatives I’d rather be running, but it is what it is. I’m still very pumped that Joe stepped down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

No one on the left is offended by inclusivity, so their tantrums about her race and gender fall on deaf ears.

Also, folks on the left know she was elected to her biggest roles and not appointed. She earned her way to the top, unlike the shitty fake judges appointed by the cockroach party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I hope it doesn’t get framed as some kind of DEI coronation.

Republicans have been crying wolf about DEI for so long, there’s no way that’s gonna stick.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Hey, stop focusing so much on “I told ya so” to people who are definitely on your side. I was torn on it as well, but out of consideration for the potential impact being unknown. Hindsight is 20/20 and we’re all better served by not gloating if we were right and instead focusing on the future path we are now on. Let’s just keep it positive and build this victory through positivity instead of potential fractures with people who likely agree with you on the issues.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Hey, stop focusing so much on “I told ya so” to people who are definitely on your side.

If they hadn’t been so arrogant and condescending while being absolutely completely 100% wrong, the temptation wouldn’t be there.

But they were. They’re the wing of the party that keeps insisting that everyone to their left doesn’t know how anything works. Turns out, political reality isn’t what it was in the early to mid '90s, and the republican-adjacent wing of the party is out of touch and doesn’t know how anything works anymore.

It’ll do centrists some good to eat crow. They need to reexamine their assumptions, because their assumptions led them to advocate continuing to run a losing candidate when democracy itself was on the line. And they need some of the uncharacteristic humility that some centrists in this thread are big enough people to actually show, and which I commend.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sorry if this is a bit off topic, but id like to put a gentle reminder here that it doesn’t help when political trolls show up pretending to be Democrats and start agitating people and causing infighting. There’s actually sociology term for it. Covert trolling.

Sure, not everyone defending biden or those against biden was a troll, but I recently saw enough of them in the mix trying, and succeeding at causing infighting between people who otherwise agree on political issues.

I find it’s helpful to remind myself that a lot of the people espousing inflammatory opinions and generally being rude online are trolls, and they don’t reflect the real opinions of most of the population.

The trolls want to control the Overton window. We stop that by educating ourselves on their tactics, and recognizing them when they show up, and not engaging. They love nothing more than wasting everyone’s time with long comment chains filled with circular arguments.

Also, your feelings are totally valid, just don’t let shitheads make you bitter. I’m sure a chunk of the people you are calling out were instigators, and not people who actually believed what they were saying.

Sorry for the long comment, and feel free to ignore it if it’s unhelpful to you!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well, when we were saying this isn’t a good idea to replace Biden the only solution yall were giving was well let’s have a vote and see what people think.

That’s not what happened. Kamala stepped up and nearly everyone rallied behind her.

So don’t act like you’re any better because when we argued the only solution was ‘let’s just throw shit at the wall and see what happens’

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I think Biden supporters are not like bitter Bernie bros. I’m a Biden supporter, and all I’m seeing from fellow supporters is pleasant surprise. We didn’t expect Harris to get this kind of support, but we’re glad to see it.

Like Biden said in his speech today, saving our democracy is by far and away the most important thing, and it looks like Harris can do it so I’m happy to see my predictions were wrong.

I do still think Biden was done dirty, but Harris is an excellent candidate and will make a great President. And she has my full support.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

Okay, I rarely comment on political posts on Lemmy, because I value my time, and my sanity. And I agree with you. This is our best chance. But I just want to say that Kamala does not represent a way to defeat American fascism. She represents a way to buy some time until we can form a movement that goes so far beyond neo liberal policies it’s unreal. It’s still unlikely, but she’s hopefully buying us 4 years.

Maybe I’m just being pedantic, but it genuinely worries me when people think that Kamala or really any major politician in the US can defeat fascism. Normal got us here, normal will send us right back.

Again, not trying to be an ass, and perhaps you also meant she buys us time, but this shit scares me. If she wins in November, and even I, as a filthy commie, I hope she does, it isn’t a victory in the war against American fascism. It’s a bandaid, a canteen of water, and a chance to regroup.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Need to shift the Overton window to the left again before we can even look at the really liberal ideas.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yeah what I mean is the trump admin would shepherd in full fledged fascism. Especially considering sotomayor’s age. It’s critically important to the entire world that he doesn’t win. Certainly more work to do after he’s defeated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I agree with you, but Kamala will probably still be the most left leaning president the USA ever had by quite a bit (AFAIK), and has a good chance to start shifting the Overton Window; if only by showing the Democratic Party that choosing more left leaning candidates actually gives them better chances of winning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Kamala will probably still be the most left leaning president the USA ever had by quite a bit

Please stop this. She’s an acceptable compromise candidate, which is better than what Biden was. Overselling her is just going to lead to disappointment and bitterness when the ad copy doesn’t match reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Kamala will probably still be the most left leaning president the USA ever had by quite a bit

Maybe in the last 50 years. FDR was closer to an actual socialist than any politician who’s had that label applied to them in America since. Kennedy was far enough left that he got shot for it. Kamala could have a chance to do some real good but let’s not get ahead of ourselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-29 points

The problem is that they then pretend like they never acted that way & are going to great lengths to cover up that they ever did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

No, we were wrong and we’re admitting it. Replacing Biden was the right call.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Kudos to you. I hope Democrats can continue to put voters interests above their own.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I was against Biden dropping out because I don’t think Harris has charisma. I’ve been pleasantly surprised at the initial reaction.

While I hope to be proven wrong, I suspect this initial momentum is going to fade before long and it’s going to get rough as the excitement dies down and the Right get their talking points dialed in.

But it’s going far better than I thought in these first few days, so I’ll happily take the L on my predictions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Right talking points so far:

She’s not a man

She’s not white

She laughs

She doesn’t have kids of her own

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I swapped from calling for Biden to stay to calling for Biden to go once sitting Congresscritters spoke out in public asking him to step down, since the main advantage of incumbency is supposed to be the ability to preserve party unity, but I was still expecting a lot more “DEMS IN DISARRAY HOW CAN THEY EVER WIN” style narrative to take root. There’s still time for me to be disappointed, but as of right now I’m pleasantly surprised.

permalink
report
parent
reply
115 points

I was one of those people. It seemed incredibly stupid to me.

I thought we’d fracture, and infighting would eat up our next three months. I thought it would squander our remaining chances. I thought the same people who didn’t want Biden also didn’t want Kamala, and I didn’t know of anyone else.

I thought it would open us up to litigation, and because I don’t trust our judicial branch, I thought that would let Republicans strangle a candidate in courts. Most importantly, I thought Republicans actually had a plan and a strategy.

I was very wrong and it doesn’t bother me at all to admit it. In fact, I’m relieved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I thought the same people who didn’t want Biden also didn’t want Kamala,

I’m still one of those people. I think she is an OK candidate, but Mark Kelly is a far better one.

That being said, I don’t see a “Bernie Bros” situation forming here. I don’t see people voting against her if she wins the nomination.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

I feel like a broken record as I keep repeating this, some agree some disagree I dont care.

Mark Kelly sucks. He opposes Medicare for all. Opposing Medicare for all is NOT a moderate position. It is definitively a right of center or conservative position. This is one of my personal deal breakers.

He also opposes the green new deal, as well as supported expanding oil drilling.

If these types of issues don’t bother you then that’s your prerogative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

. I think she is an OK candidate, but Mark Kelly is a far better one.

The last thing the Dems need is to go to the right again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Right there with you. Now…people are acting like this is over and it is very far from it but I’m at least cautiously optimistic. Here’s to hoping Kamala makes a good VP pick and runs a good campaign. Long road ahead still but yes, I’m very much relieved it hasn’t gone off the rails so far.

By god, so far I am ecstatic I was wrong. Here’s to hoping I’ll still be proven wrong all the way into November 5.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

100% felt the same way as you. Now my sister and l are going to volunteer.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Respect you for saying that

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Hell yeah! Looks like someone got some ass today!

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Yep. I was very wrong. I completely misread the pulse of the Democratic party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The pulse of the Democratic Party was supposed to be measured during the primaries. Obviously they are broken.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

I will admit I was wrong.

At first I was like noooooo, then when he endorsed Kamala I was like, oh god nooooooo…but I’ll eat my words. I’m excited and happy with the outcome so far and, regardless, was voting dem anyway.

Like, maybe I’m speaking too soon, but I almost feel…a modicum of hope again?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’ll admit I was wrong too. I thought it would turn into an intra-party squabble that lasted weeks, but I’m pleasantly surprised. It’s nice to be able to make a positive choice instead of just a “lesser evil” one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Yeah, I really don’t understand the people that were against Biden dropping out. It was so very obvious after that debate. Just no way he was going to beat that narrative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I didn’t expect the party to so quickly coalesce around Harris honestly. I thought if Biden dropped out, it would be chaos and the Republicans would sail to victory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It almost seems possible the democratic leadership might have potentially possibly maybe learned something perhaps and came up with a strategy for how to deal with trump that doesn’t hinge on trying to do the same things that worked in 2020 (and then failed miserably in 2022). Good for them! Maybe next they’ll learn they don’t have to court moderate republican voters to switch sides, and instead focus on the vast swath of Americans who feel so disenchanted with American Politics that they don’t vote, or even really pay attention to politics, because the Democrats are, globally, conservative, and the Republicans are, globally, insane

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I thought the plan might be to make a bit of a spectacle of an open primary, depriving the convicted felon of the attention he so craves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I was absolutely baffled at how many downvotes I got for saying I didn’t think Biden had his head in the game after he was like “I’ll do my best but if I lose oh well 🤷‍♂️”. Like… holy fuck. That was perhaps the most catastrophically tone-deaf thing I’ve ever heard an otherwise fairly skilled politician say - and I’ve heard a LOT of politicians say a LOT of stupid things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I was absolutely baffled at how many downvotes I got

Not to mention all the gaslighting, false accusations, condescension and abuse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I don’t know about “all of Lemmy.”

After the debate, most of the top comments were pro-dropout.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I’m extremely happy to admit I was wrong. I did bitch and moan, but it didn’t fracture the party at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 430K

    Comments