You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
226 points
*

A more expensive, clunkier product, with a bunch of needless fluff in it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
122 points

Enshitification 101

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

For which they will be able to offer subscriptions in a year or 2.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You mean twice the ram (1 gig more than the shield), 4 times the storage (32 gigs), and a better remote (chirping find my remote feature, programmable button, and less shitty volume buttons)?

Yep. Sure sounds worse considering it also supports all the same features of the chromecast 4k and AV1 decoding.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

They’re supposedly using pretty much the same chipset. So the most important part is still underpowered, these Android boxes generally work fine even with 2-3GBs of RAM.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

From OP article

such as a processor that’s 22 percent faster

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Regular Chromecast work perfectly as YouTube jukebox.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

What do you mean regular Chromecast?

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

My Chromecast has no storage and no remote. It’s fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-49 points

Cool. Keep using it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

And ethernet port!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yes! I hadn’t seen that highlighted anywhere in articles really, only saw it on the damn Google Store after looking just now.

Seems an all around solid update on the previous device.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You can get an Ethernet adapter for the Chromecast

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

None of which changes the fact that it’s more expensive and clunkier, and none of which feels necessary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I don’t need any of that. I just need a cheap dongle that can run one app

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points
*

The dongle still works. They reached market saturation with people who just want a dongle. They can’t realistically be expected to produce these forever.

Edit

Classic Lemmy. Point out that these are not charities and companies can’t keep producing niche products that you aren’t buying but maybe potentially want to buy someday and get thrown down votes. Down votes without a response tell me you’re just butthurt about the truth.

Sorry folks whether you like it or not it’s the truth. Companies like to sell things and if these were actually being bought enough to make a profit they wouldn’t be discontinued. Your TV probably has this feature built in now. Want another? Buy it second hand, the market is absolutely flooded with these second hand because they’re just collecting dust in cabinets. If Google kept making these they’d just end up as unsold stock in a landfill.

Your existing chromecast dongle will continue to connect because Google needs chromecast the protocol to continue to work to compete with Apples Airplay. It’s the same reason the Chromecast Audio dongle continues to work 5 years after it’s end of life.

If you want to make sure you have them forever buy up your local second hand stock but otherwise no one has given a convincing argument why these need more e-waste getting produced at the factory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Most of the appeal of the Chromecast is that it’s a dongle you plug in once and never have to see again. It doesn’t need high performance and 32 gigs of RAM. It needs to play video. That’s its entire purpose. It’s controlled by any phone on your wifi, it doesn’t need a remote.

For most users, this is an expensive downgrade.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The remote was the biggest upgrade for me on the Ultra though. I always struggled to find my phone and do stuff on it just to watch some YouTube or Netflix videos. And the Kids don’t even have a phone and they want to watch on the TV in the livingroom too sometimes. With the remote it’s easy for everyone to use it without fiddling with the Phone.

My parents have the one without the remote and they basically never use it because my mom doesn’t have a mobile phone and my dad newer has it with him, it’s always not charged or in some other room.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s controlled by any phone on your wifi, it doesn’t need a remote.

Or you can use it’s remote and not need to use your phone for absolutely every little thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s also twice the price of the Onn 4k Pro (Walmart house brand) that’s built on the same chip and has the same features running the stock Google TV experience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Now with AI!

I’m not sure why they didn’t just call it the chrome cast gen whatever though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

So you could just ask it for anything and it could make it up?

“Google, show ‘Ow! My Balls!’”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I wonder how far away we are from AI being able to create video on demand like that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Or literally just reuse the Android TV name

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 556K

    Comments