You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
60 points

God I hate artists that talk like that

permalink
report
reply
28 points

She was cueing the audience in that there is more going on, so dummie’s like me can know to look for more. I still needed a kind commenter to explain it to me.

I guess she wanted a larger audience to be able to experience her work, than you would have preferred.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

I believe the deeper meaning is that even while weed is legalized in several states in the US, there are still many people in those same states serving sentences over the drug when it was criminalized. Those sentences were absurdly harsh, and disproportionately targeted black people.

So when the girl in the painting sees the dispensary, which is supposed to be a symbol of progress towards legalization, she instead sees her dad—still in prison, trapped from behind the glass in one of those restricted visitation rooms where you can only talk to one another over inline telephones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I’m gonna be completely honest here I thought that was the pharmacist on the phone with a customer and he and the girl were waving hi to each other.

I may be a little dense and naive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hey thanks, I get it now and you’re totally right :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Artists that talk like they’re showing off their latest work that they’re proud of? I don’t understand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

It’s killing the frog. Instead of letting the audience experience the work and the emotional journey therein. The artist is introducing the piece with with the very blatant context of ‘this painting looks pretty but is actually really deep, can you find what I mean?’

It’s not bad, per se, but it cheapens the experience and comes off as pretentious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

on social though it’s so easy to scroll by. It’s different in an art gallery.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I agree. It shows lack of faith in your work and your audience. It also takes away the audiences’ sense of “getting it” when they look and notice, which makes your audience feel smart and in conversation with you.

Reminds me of those little panels beside paintings in a gallery that sometimes tell you way too much about what the artist was thinking. The work itself is supposed to be communicating, if you need supplemental material then you may have failed somewhat in the original work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

At the same time I think a lot of people would just say “oh that’s nice” without looking for the subtext. I get what you’re saying, but this probably helps more people become engaged with the art.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Hate is easy.

permalink
report
parent
reply

US Authoritarianism

!usauthoritarianism@lemmy.world

Create post

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that’s fine.

There’s other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world

Community stats

  • 4.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 333

    Posts

  • 7.3K

    Comments

Community moderators