You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
7 points
*

So far, tests results with a “high” reliability are negative, ie cannot reproduce results. Looks like the claim is either false, or the conditions to get the superconducting material to work aren’t so easy to get.

Let’s not rush, give people a few weeks to finish tests, review the original paper, then let’s see what experts in the field think.

Edit: link

permalink
report
reply
1 point

There’s more preliminary results from other teams, including a simulation and an actual experiment.

Maybe there’s some hope after all. Let’s put the champagne in the fridge (not the freezer) in case it’s real. It may take a while for the original+replication studies to be peer reviewed and published.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science

!science@beehaw.org

Create post

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 269

    Monthly active users

  • 831

    Posts

  • 4.6K

    Comments