While Russian pilots were managing to support land operations in the south of Ukraine, they were doing so “without decisive operational effect,” the British Ministry of Defense said in its daily intelligence update on Monday.

To compensate, Russia was sending adapted free-fall bombs into Ukrainian territory. However, these had “yet to demonstrate consistent accuracy,” it added.

“Over the summer, Russian tactical combat aircraft have typically carried out over 100 sorties a day, but these are almost always restricted to operating over Russian-controlled territory due to the threat from Ukrainian air defenses,” the update said.

Neither Russia nor Ukraine has been able to gain air superiority in the war so far despite Russia’s vastly larger air force. But a military expert previously told Insider that the “advantage is with defense.”

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
10 points

What’re the vatniks gonna say next?

“Actually, it’s cheaper to send underequiped mobniks into battle than it is to shoot them. It’s a tactic to waste Ukrainian small arms ammunition”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

“They’re doing it on purpose” has to be my #1 favorite excuse for Russia’s poor performance. Like, it acknowledges that something seemingly non-optimal is happening, but turns out it’s actually some sort wildly ingenious plan that only looks stupid.

Still waiting for those super duper secret reserve elite troops with 999999999 T-14s and Su-57s to show up and mop the floor with the Ukrainians, like I’ve been promised for way too long now

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

5 or 6 d chess. They might even go to 7 if they have to. there is no limit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hyperdimensional Snakes and ladders

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I wouldn’t doubt it, wasn’t one of their excuses for failing at not shooting down the HIMARS that were killing their troops and destroying depots “the S400 missiles would be wasted shooting at something as cheap as a HIMARS”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Ironic considering they sued the manufacturer of the S400 specifically because they were sold as being able to intercept HIMARS and are woefully unable to do so, even in ideal conditions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

There’s no irony there: they know their lies aren’t consistent since that’s by design. They’re showing their subjects that they can remake reality as they see fit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
3 points

Y’know, I’ve never shot an RPG. Hell, I’m a pretty shit American, I’ve never shot anything more powerful than an air rifle.

I’m pretty sure even I wouldn’t do that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

now consider that it’s one of most popular antitank weapons in the world, and primary one of that army, and it’s used all the time because it’s active frontline. i don’t know how this happens

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

and he’s not even alone out there, he could have just asked

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

to be fair this one sounds more believable.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Ukraine

!ukraine@sopuli.xyz

Create post

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.


Donate to support Ukraine’s Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


Community stats

  • 3.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.2K

    Posts

  • 28K

    Comments