You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
129 points
*

If I understand correctly, there’s nothing about Firefox that makes ad blockers any harder to detect. What can Firefox and uBlock do to stop Google from blocking adblock users on the site?

That said, I use Firefox and uBlock myself, and I’ve yet to see YouTube stop me from using the site.

permalink
report
parent
reply
114 points

They don’t care about Firefox. Chrome is the browser market, they have weakened extensions, they implemented DRM, and here we are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
146 points

Coming to you later… “Your browser violates YouTube’s Terms of Service.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

This would become an Anti trust suit I would imagine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

You could use an extension that changes your user agent but I’m not sure how well that’d work

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Laughs in useragent switch

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

They’re TRYING, but for now, it would be a user agent extension matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

It doesn’t matter if YouTube can detect uBlock. The great thing about uBlock is you can just block the anti-adblock script. Since Javascript is executed on the user’s computer, it’s trivial to just tell your computer to ignore it. And moving it to server side would cost them too much money in processing power.

That’s why they want everyone to adopt their DRM, so they don’t have to worry about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

This logic is so flawed lol. It’s also completely trivial for them to detect when their anti-adblock script has been blocked. If it gets blocked, then they can just stop serving you videos.

There are websites that already do this; it’s not theoretical. The website just doesn’t work if it detects an adblocker.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Whether or not it’s trivial to detect depends on the method used to block it. It already is an arms race, and said race will continue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Ok but do they know we know they know we know they know?!

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

OK, show us an example. I’ve never run across a website that adblockers just didn’t work on, but maybe you know of one. Give us an example, and we’ll see if we can bypass that. Then we’ll know which of us understands how Javascript works, and which doesn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Firefox currently enjoys protection from being “relatively niche” in the browser market (aka not Chromium based trash).

But if I had to place a bet on which browser would put effort in to protecting your privacy, including which extensions are installed, my bet would be on Firefox over Chrome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

i think it’s mainly the list maintainers staying on-the-ball with changes to sites. they can move quicker than a giant corporation can develop, test, and roll-out potentially site-breaking changes that could adversely affect ‘billions’ of users.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It has always been my understanding that uBlock and uBlock Origin were two totally different extensions for ad blocking. Is this not correct? Back several year ago when ad blockers were new, I recall seeing two different Firefox listings for them, and people would caution users to get uBlock Origin and not the other truncated named one

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Ublock fucked the creator who made ublock origin

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I am assuming that is metaphorical?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The difference is Firefox is not a chromium based browser and thus not subject to googles fucking bullshit, esp when we come to things like web drm

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What can Firefox and uBlock do to stop Google from blocking adblock users on the site

Not sure if you question is serious … but just in case, Mozilla is one of the few non-profit orgs that is fighting for an open web

ref. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/manifesto/

and uBlock Origin can literally work its magic because firefox provides the necessary APIs that allows it to work. (old ref. but AFAIK still relevant: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-best-on-Firefox)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

Just another Firefox fan boy. They do this shit when as blockers get brought up too as if Brave, Vivaldi, etc isn’t going to strip out the ad blocker nonsense when they build their versions. Just because these versions use Chromium as a base in no way means they have to use their code. Firefox fan boys are too busy talking about Firefox to understand this.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 553K

    Comments