220 points

I actually didn’t care when there was an ad in the beginning of the video or what not. It was when I had to start watching multiple ads in the middle of a 10 minute video as well. Like come on, not even broadcast TV is that annoying.

permalink
report
reply
47 points

Shorts are such a stupidly blatant way to start showing more ads than content, and they make navigating channels impossible. Hell you can’t even get away from ads in search results with premium.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Shorts are just a TikTok clone…

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Which is just a Vine clone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Noaw I understand why so many people hate shorts! I never use the official app or browser to watch, so I don’t see the advertisements.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

SponsorBlock addon

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The holy trinity: ublock origin, sponsorblock and dearrow. Using all of them makes YT great again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

haven’t heard of dearrow, what does that do?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Adding an insane amount of ads is a dark pattern to convince you into joining Youtube Premium. Which is crazy expensive by the way, 13,99 $/month

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Premium will eventually show ads too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Absolutely. Infinite growth demands more and more. Always. Fuck the customer, increase shareholder value this quarter!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

“Tired of ads? Upgrade to YouTube Premium PLUS to get rid of all ads!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Honestly I bought YouTube premium through a VPN to turkey for that price for the entire year. Seems worth it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I mostly wanted YouTube Music for my bedroom speaker, but if they’re throwing in ad-free YouTube along with it, so be it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Same here. I was listening to a beautiful violin piece being played by a soloist and an ad interrupted it. I would be fine with watching the ad before. I immediately went and watched it elsewhere.

Later, I came back to YouTube for something unrelated and had a message/popup that said ‘tired of being interrupted? Upgrade to premium here!’

They know exactly what they are doing, trying to make it unbearable to use anything other than premium. They can get fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Tired of Youtube? Try Odysee or peertube.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Or the knack of starting the add 2 seconds into a guitar solo…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Normal TV is infuriating enough that I can’t be bothered to watch any of that stuff. Watching videos on a computer is just so much nicer. If TV broadcasting stopped tomorrow and everyone around me was in a conspiracy of hiding it from me, it could take me years to find out.

YouTube has been going downhill for many years now, and there have been many incremental steps towards becoming as bad as TV. If they take that final step, I’ll start treating YT the same way I treat TV.

permalink
report
parent
reply
187 points

laughs in firefox + uBlock Origin

permalink
report
reply
129 points
*

If I understand correctly, there’s nothing about Firefox that makes ad blockers any harder to detect. What can Firefox and uBlock do to stop Google from blocking adblock users on the site?

That said, I use Firefox and uBlock myself, and I’ve yet to see YouTube stop me from using the site.

permalink
report
parent
reply
114 points

They don’t care about Firefox. Chrome is the browser market, they have weakened extensions, they implemented DRM, and here we are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
146 points

Coming to you later… “Your browser violates YouTube’s Terms of Service.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

It doesn’t matter if YouTube can detect uBlock. The great thing about uBlock is you can just block the anti-adblock script. Since Javascript is executed on the user’s computer, it’s trivial to just tell your computer to ignore it. And moving it to server side would cost them too much money in processing power.

That’s why they want everyone to adopt their DRM, so they don’t have to worry about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

This logic is so flawed lol. It’s also completely trivial for them to detect when their anti-adblock script has been blocked. If it gets blocked, then they can just stop serving you videos.

There are websites that already do this; it’s not theoretical. The website just doesn’t work if it detects an adblocker.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Firefox currently enjoys protection from being “relatively niche” in the browser market (aka not Chromium based trash).

But if I had to place a bet on which browser would put effort in to protecting your privacy, including which extensions are installed, my bet would be on Firefox over Chrome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

i think it’s mainly the list maintainers staying on-the-ball with changes to sites. they can move quicker than a giant corporation can develop, test, and roll-out potentially site-breaking changes that could adversely affect ‘billions’ of users.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It has always been my understanding that uBlock and uBlock Origin were two totally different extensions for ad blocking. Is this not correct? Back several year ago when ad blockers were new, I recall seeing two different Firefox listings for them, and people would caution users to get uBlock Origin and not the other truncated named one

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Ublock fucked the creator who made ublock origin

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The difference is Firefox is not a chromium based browser and thus not subject to googles fucking bullshit, esp when we come to things like web drm

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What can Firefox and uBlock do to stop Google from blocking adblock users on the site

Not sure if you question is serious … but just in case, Mozilla is one of the few non-profit orgs that is fighting for an open web

ref. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/manifesto/

and uBlock Origin can literally work its magic because firefox provides the necessary APIs that allows it to work. (old ref. but AFAIK still relevant: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-best-on-Firefox)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

Just another Firefox fan boy. They do this shit when as blockers get brought up too as if Brave, Vivaldi, etc isn’t going to strip out the ad blocker nonsense when they build their versions. Just because these versions use Chromium as a base in no way means they have to use their code. Firefox fan boys are too busy talking about Firefox to understand this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Except WEI is going to make it so the website can detect and block you if you don’t allow the ads, regardless of your browser and extensions

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

At the moment WEI has been rejected by mozilla, so it wont be implemented into firefox. if google decides to add it into chrome and to their services, they will effectively lock out all firefox users. - A very anarchistic part of me actually would like to see how that would play out … but at the moment i am unsure if google would actually dare doing this, but i guess, it will only be a matter of time and we’ll find out.

Not sure if this move would actually damage the open web … since basically google would single itself out as the enemy … and i dont see many users appreciating such a move.

But if the worst happens and the whole web follows googles example, i guess we can just call this iteration of a “open web” a failure and start over with something much simpler … maybe something like the gemini protocol as its base, which isnt polluted with clientside javascript garbage and bloated CSS/XHTML parsers and rendering engines .

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I fully expect that without a change of current course, Google will ensure yt will just stop working on Firefox at some point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Firefox + uBlock Origin user here. I started getting those popups a few days ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Purge and update your filter cache, check to make sure you have Anti-adblock filters enabled. If that doesn’t work do some troubleshooting with the extensions, one user found that other extensions were interfering and after disabling the problematic extension it worked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’ll try this. Thank you very much!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Laughs in Invidious

permalink
report
parent
reply
130 points

People who choose not to watch ads are far more likely to not spend money based on ads. I know that when I see the same crappy ads over and over, yeah, I remember the name of the product, and I remind myself every time never to buy it. I’m more likely to buy from that seller if I don’t see their ads.

permalink
report
reply
48 points

100% agree, but they charge for eyeballs, not clicks.

permalink
report
parent
reply

That’s because the average person is influenced by seeing the same shit over and over again, and it improves sales. Not every single person, just most of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Not most. Just enough to make it worth the money they spend.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Depends on the age demographic and lifestyle. For example, I pretty much buy the same things for the last 20 years. I’m not going to change my shopping patterns because of an ad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Clicks are the core part of how ads work… Cost-per-Click, Click-Through-Rate, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Everyone thinks ads only work on other people, that’s why ads haven’t been banned yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Yeah. I’m completely allergic to ads. If this goes through I’m simply not going to use YT anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I operate this way too. There must be literally dozens of us.

In all seriousness, I do find it somewhat surprising that some of these companies think saturating everything with ads is a good idea. As a simple matter of brand recognition, I get that the power of suggestion is a helluva drug. But all that stuff does eventually glom together in my head as general advertising nonsense – as a result I see companies that advertise less / not at all and rely on a quality product and word of mouth as a better buy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

They don’t just think it’s a good idea, marketers have convinced themselves they’re doing you a favor by pummeling you with advertisements day and night.

How else could you learn about their valuable product if not for constant, unending advertisement?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

I work in Google Ads every day.

It’s more likely that they’re incompetent and haven’t checked/manually set up their video / display ads, and have let Google decide how often to show their ads. Google then decides to show their ads as often as possible because it gets clicks (even if they’re accidental) and nets them more money each time.

The best trick Google ever pulled was telling advertiser’s to trust them with their money and “leave it up to the algorithm”.

Fuck no, you set it up so Google doesn’t abuse their platform and spam your ads everywhere, ignoring everything Google tell you to do.

The shit I’ve seen in people’s accounts because Google told them to do it…

You can and should limit the amount of times your adverts are shown per day to someone. There’s a not-so-fine line between brand awareness and pissing off potential customers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I can list a ton of products I by principle will never use. Athelic greens, casper mattresses, simplisafe, express/nordVPN, Honey … Some people may see a pattern there.

Ironically I might actually buy your product even if you spam annoying ads as long as you do it on a platform I block ads on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No Ad is good sunscreen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

then they are succesfully livin in your head rent free

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Chumba…Jordan Peterson and the stupid best fiends game, I’ll NEVER use

permalink
report
parent
reply
128 points

Lamo this will introduce more people to revanced

permalink
report
reply
66 points

You know why it’s called revanced? Because youtube came after vanced. They wont ignore it forever, unfortunately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
80 points
*

YouTube Vanced was shut down because they tried to monetise it by releasing their own crypto NFTs, sparking Google to shut it down. I think for now Revanced is safe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Every great project always seems to have that one dude who is like, “But what if crypto?”. Really hoping we are moving past that phase.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

The thing is that Revanced follows a new distribution model. Rather than distributing a modified app, they instead distribute patches for the normal YouTube APK so that the user modifies the app on their own device. Thus, ReVanced never distributes any of Google’s IP. It’s kinda like game modding. ReVanced will be a lot harder for Google to kill.

The one downside for ReVanced is that it’s harder for ordinary users to install, so that will limit its popularity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

True enough, but there are always options.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Rerevanced will be popular

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*

Oof, one day soon, we’ll all be watching torrented rips of youtube videos, like we already do TV shows.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Rererevanced will be the pinnacle

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I know if I’m not wrong vanced got in trouble for using YouTube logo and reverse engineering the YouTube app. Revanced technically not breaking any law as it not directly modifying YouTube like vanced.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Yeah, but YT can change the terms, and now blocking ads, its clear they are stepping up the aggression in chasing profitability.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

What are they gonna do? Revanced is just a patcher, unlike the previous version that fully distributes modified YouTube apk. There is a separate repo that has patched YouTube apk, but if that repo got taken down, the revanced manager still live on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

it’s YouTube re-Advanced

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Bailamos.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Or, you could buy YouTube TV, which gives you YouTube Premium as a undisclosed bonus I’ve found. A great option because it helps content creators and allows you to cut cable. I may have some bias on the topic of paying for media content services, but in general pirating hurts the creators. I hate that I’m old and wise enough that I might have been more receptive to Metallica’s arguments during the Napster era. I do feel though that it is in the best interest of creators for certain content to be previewable. The problem with YouTube video monetization are that most are not going to be rewatched.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Wait what? I have YouTube TV and pay for YouTube Premium so would love to not do the latter. Where might I find this undisclosed bonus?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I simply find that when I am logged into YouTube with my same account that purchased YouTube TV I receive no ads. I am not using an add blocker or anything. I assumed that was because of my purchase of YouTube TV. It might be a bug with my account because I still get a splash occasionally to buy premium, however no ads ever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
127 points

Adblock is one of the greatest human inventions of all time.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

The best anti virus innovation in decades.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I agree

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 553K

    Comments