You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
62 points

I wonder who they hired to do the facial modelling. The environments look really good but the faces look like games from 15 years ago. I really expected more from the game that Microsoft has been making so much fanfare over.

permalink
report
reply
50 points
*

I really expected more

I’m sorry, but why? Why do people do this every time a new game comes out? This is what Bethesda does, and Microsoft isn’t much better.

Every new game it’s like people forget what these companies do.

You should’ve expected a Bethesda game.

Btw elder scrolls 6 will suck, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

It’s crazy.

Bethesda have owned id Software, the best graphics engineers in the business, for a decade. They now even have Microsoft money. This is still, somehow, the best they can do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

No it is not the best they can do. I haven’t played starfield yet, but it should be obvious that no company with shareholders to whom they need to answer is ever going to do “the best they can do”.

That isn’t even their target, at least not overall. Their target is maximum profitability. Putting forth maximum effort for the best graphics is not going to result in max profits, so they were never going to do that.

And that’s to say nothing of the fact that graphical showcases just aren’t what Bethesda does in the first place. No one should have expected that. This isn’t an id game.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Starfield…doesn’t suck though.

I’ve sunk 20 hours into it so far and it’s amazing. You people just have your expectations up the ass for a company that is great at one formula and expect them to do the other when they never said they would. It’s ya’lls fucking fault for expecting No Mans Sky to be the greatest fucking game of all time at release over a company that made fucking Joe Danger.

Cyberpunk 2077 I can understand more as it was made from the guys who made The Witcher 3, so feature wise I can understand the betrayal and they fucked up by lying to us. But it’s still ya’lls fault for expecting it to not be buggy and broken as fuck when it was delayed 3 fucking times. The red flags were there, and you STILL bought it.

Oblivion and Skyrim have the same basic formula with little differences sprinkled in here and there mechanics wise that make it feel different, but familiar. Starfield is the same way and I fully expect ES 6 to do the same. But that’s fine. I don’t want anything groundbreaking. I just want Skyrim but with modern graphics, animations, different setting, and some new mechanics.

Good god you people are negative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

It’s ya’lls fucking fault for expecting No Mans Sky to be the greatest fucking game of all time at release

Yeah, having read over a bunch of comments here, a lot of the comments that are unhappy about Starfield are basically people expecting it to be like No Man’s Sky, or some people who just don’t like Bethesda games in general. The ones that are happy tend to be people comparing it to earlier Bethesda games that they liked.

I really like Bethesda games, so for me, that’s great. But I do also get that there are people who don’t like Bethesda games, and for those people, being told that they’re wrong and that they should like it drives them nuts.

I think a good rule of thumb is to probably expect Starfield to be similar to earlier Bethesda games, like Skyrim and Fallout 4. If you like those games, you’ll probably like Starfield. If you dislike them, you’re probably going to dislike Starfield.

But trying to convince people who really like Bethesda games that they suck or to convince people who really dislike Bethesda games that they’re great is kind of not likely to work well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

This happens with every Bethesda release because they overhype their games and keep their PR vague enough that people can fill in the gaps any way they want to. They’ve been doing this since Morrowind. This review/user response controversy is nothing new and neither are the usual criticisms of Bethesda games half-assing everything from accessibility to writing to various gameplay elements.

And then instead of holding Bethesda accountable for their nonsense the fanboys like you go out and attack and blame other fans for it. Getting really sick of Bethesda fans shitting on anyone with criticism of their precious game company while whining about how toxic gaming culture is with zero self-awareness.

If you’re ok with Bethesda never innovating that’s fine, but stop trying yti shut down other people’s valid criticisms or acting like they’re stupid for expecting and wanting higher quality releases.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Eh? Point out at what point in my life I ever gave a shit about no man’s sky…

Did you reply to the wrong person or…?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

that’s your opinion. A lot of people have a lot of fun with bethesda games…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You’d think Bethesda would notice what you claim to have.

That’s the point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No I wouldn’t think that, they’ve never acted in a manner that indicates that they have that capacity, why would I assume they do?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

What’s the point of this comment? People are allowed to complain and criticize Bethesda for the things they seemingly refuse to improve on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

In Fallout 4 and Skyrim, modders did ultimately put out high-poly-count heads, high-detail eyes, etc. I imagine that if tradition holds, there will be modders doing the same in Skyrim.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

And also probably Starfield 😉

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Oops, thanks, yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

TBH the faces look fine for me. At least on major NPCs that have a role. All of the NPCs out in the cities are the ones that look wonky. I give it a pass though considering you’d have to be fucking staring at them immensely to actually notice.

Either way, modders will take care of it. That’s the beauty of these games. Anything remotely dumb that Bethesda overlooks, (which is every game) will be fixed.

Still having a ton of fun.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

But eventually they lose all credibility and everyone abandons the Xbox platform. It’s really getting to the point where Steam is the only one worth using. And I’ve bought every Xbox at launch, except for the Xbox One. Playstation tends to cater to people who like turn based games, aka interactive slideshows. Xbox has just been stagnating for the past few years, and this was supposed to be the game to finally prove to us once and for all that they can put out a good modern game. Overall the game itself is pretty good and I’m not seeing much bugginess at all. But the way the devs speak about this game, I really expected something they could actually be proud of. They can always improve things with patches, of course. But at this point Starfield is a first party game, so I really expect it to showcase what the Xbox hardware can do. It’s as if Microsoft has nothing to do with the QA process of all of the studios they’ve acquired.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Playstation tends to cater to people who like turn based games, aka interactive slideshows.

What games do you have in mind that are turn based?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Playstation tends to cater to people who like turn based games, aka interactive slideshows.

Huh.

I’m a few generations out of date on consoles, but I was kind of disappointed with console turn-based games.

I normally think of the PC as the place to go, because the mouse and high resolution are often good partners for that.

Turn-based strategy games, stuff like Paradox titles especially seemed to be a PC thing.

Do you mean relative to the other console platforms, or relative to all other platforms in general? If so, what titles?

Maybe turn-based RPGs or something, stuff in the vein of Final Fantasy? Is that what you mean?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Meh, being able to build your own ship like Skyrim and kerbal space progran had a baby sounds like it makes up for that but I haven’t played the game so idk. Most space games are either a massive ripoff (think Star Citizen) or a major grindfest (Elite Dangerous) so it’s good to see someone try to make a space game that isn’t like that.

No Man’s Sky and Stationeers are almost similar games that are good but in those games the space ship game mechanics and functionality just aren’t there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’ve been playing it and it’s a great game. I just wish they could have gotten the faces good enough for the game to showcase what the Xbox and PC are capable of. The environments even look great. They really dropped the ball considering it’s Microsoft’s biggest first party launch in something like 5 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The shipbuilding is limited in order to try and not break the game.

You can only have one cockpit, warp drive, fusion generator, and shield generator. You can’t have dual core and double shielded guns with an cockpit strapped to them that obliterates anything in sight.

It is more like Fallout meets Cyberpunk 2077 in space with a complex loading screen mini game that doubles as a remote inventory, which you can spend hours customizing somewhat.

NMS’s use of ships is far better, like being able to fly around from place to place instead of loading screen around. NMS’s ship flying with SF’s shipbuilding would have been ideal.

Hopefully modders will be able to fix the shipbuilding.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Have no real interest in playing it, but do they still do the Skyrim thing where they have like 5 wildly different voice actors, so it feels like the guards are following you from town to town?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Games

!games@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

Community stats

  • 9.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.1K

    Posts

  • 88K

    Comments