You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
8 points

I’m south african. My government has the means of production for electricity seized (they own Eskom which has a monopoly.) It is well known that while the regular person has to deal with load shedding, the government officials do not

Add the issues with South African Airways and I would not like all the means of production to be owned by the government

permalink
report
reply
24 points
*

Owned by the government is specifically NOT “owned by the workers”. That is definitionally not socialism, and it’s not communism either.

I seriously hate how no one even knows what socialism or real communism is… Only in stupid authoritarian “communism” like China do you have the government own much of anything directly. Hell, in proper Communism, there’s not supposed to be much of a government at all. Nothing like the giant armies of beurocrats and politicians most places have today, anyways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

That’s kind of the point of most people who don’t think communism can function in current society, the government represents the people, right? So “the people” owning the means of production just becomes “the government” owning the means of production.

Which is why all “communist” states that have ever existed function identically to their fascist counterparts, because regardless of what you call it, the state owns everything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

That is because most people literally lack the imagination. Literally incapable of understanding. Extreme communism doesn’t even have personal property or a main government, so to fail to see anything other than government ownership is a big tell on ignorance. Yes, most people are ignorant, and those in charge LOVE that fact.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

How workers would own the means of production in socialism/communism without the government?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Only full blown anarchists and extreme libertarians don’t want a government at all. It is utterly foolish to think all leftists wouldn’t support ‘an’ enforcement agency, regulations, and laws…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

People expressing opposition to the military industrial complex get called tankies these days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well that’s just a complete and utter misuse of the term, then. Possibly an effort by tankies to remove meaning from the label.

A tankie is a fake “leftist” who idolizes leftist policies and ideals, but does it via worship of the past efforts, like the USSR, or even specific “socialists” or “communists” like Lenin and so many other horrible dictators… in so doing, they completely and utterly fail to live a single leftist ideal and in reality end up idolizing fascists and authoritarians like Mao. This makes them functionally identical to fascists whilst they claim leftist motives.

Tankies realize leftist ideas are good, but utterly and completely fail to connect wishes with meaningful action, thus want some power figure to do it for them. They’re too stupid, ball-less, and self-centered to realize the actions they want to take are at best representative democracies, and at worst fascist dictatorships.

Tankies are wonderful to learn to properly identify, because it makes it sooo much easier to discard them and look for real leftists instead of idiots who use the same words.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

should be owned by the people

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I trust those people even less

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Trust me, you don’t want those amenities in the hands of unelected greedy business men either.

Load shedding is still better than not having any electricity at all because it isn’t profitable enough to manage the power net in your region.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

At least the greedy business men have a business to run. The politicians just get bailed out and spend it on luxury cars

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think perhaps decentralizing the means of production would be a better path.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You live in a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, i.e. a liberal democracy where the bourgeoisie (owners of the means of production) dictate the laws.

State owned companies work for the interests of the ruling class, in this case the bourgeoisie, so you can bet it is subsidized by the people and the ruling class (and their businesses) benefit off it. (Socializing losses and privatizing profits)

If it was owned by say Elon Musk, it wouldn’t be any different for the regular working class people. Only the relations between the bourgeoisie may change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

In other terms, he’s at the more equal pig stage.

The working class should own the means, not the ruling class.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 284K

    Comments