A Texas grandfather who was about to officiate a wedding in Nebraska errantly shot and wounded his own 12-year-old grandson when he tried to fire a gun in the air to get the attention of guests Saturday, according to authorities.

Odessa, Texas resident Michael Gardner, 62, is facing legal trouble after the Pietta 1860 snub nose revolver went off around 5 p.m. and accidentally struck the young boy in the shoulder at Hillside Events, Lancaster County Sheriff’s Office chief deputy Ben Houchin said during a press conference Monday.

The gun fired a blank round that had black powder in the casing that was glued together, the sheriff’s official said.

Before the attention-catching shot, guests were scattered around the Denton, Nebraska venue because the nuptials started late after someone forgot the wedding rings, Houchin explained.

“When he decided to cock back the hammer of this revolver it slipped and it shot his grandson in the left shoulder, causing an injury,” Houchin said, later adding. “What we believe is the glue injured the child.”

The injury was non-life threatening, though the boy still required hospitalization.

“We do not believe Michael intended to hurt his grandchild, but the act was not very smart,” Houchin said.

Gardner was still slapped with a child abuse charge because of the carelessness and the injury to the youngster, the chief deputy said. He surrendered to authorities Monday.

“It’s just kind of neglectful to take a gun out that has blanks and fire it amongst people,” he said.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
12 points

I don’t think that’s fair. I’ve taken gun/hunting education classes from some volunteer instructors that seemed to me to be about the most serious, responsible people I’ve ever met.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Cool beans. Everyone considers themselves to be a “responsible gun owner” right up until the moment they shoot someone or themselves. It’s not a matter of if but when it’s going to happen.

Edit: Gun nuts and apologists line up here to get blocked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

I’m not a fan of guns myself, but this is quite a reach.

There are certainly many, MANY more irresponsible gun owners than responsible ones out there. But to say that there are none is just objectively false.

Do accidents happen? Yes, and they can happen to anyone. The difference is that a responsible owner’s accident isn’t going to end up with a person getting shot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

No, there are far more responsible gun owners than irresponsible ones. There are roughly 100 million gun owners in the USA. If “most” of those people were irresponsible then there wouldn’t be 100 million of them left. We only hear about the irresponsible ones having accidents or committing crimes, which is a tiny percentage of the overall 100 million.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Excellent example of a “No True Scotsman” fallacy. Well done! Bit of a shame you’re trying to use it in an actual debate, but you do you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s an absolutely absurd claim. The fraction of gun owners that ever shoot a human being is very close to zero.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If they didn’t have guns, it would be zero.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is like the claim that humans are addicted to oxygen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I have some friends who are adamant anti gun folk and I get that. It’s what the numbers say is ideal. I used to be pro gun (grew up in a very conservative cult), then anti gun, now I’m somewhere in the middle with “yeah it would be better to reduce the amount of guns but this is kind of where we’re at” and feel like a more pragmatic approach to getting us towards a gun free utopia (read: idealized society that can never be achieved) is probably best. Unfortunately it requires national cooperation and my country, uh, that is not what they do. On a personal level tho I somehow have become the person who gets to inherit all the guns in the family and except for the cool, inoperable civil war rifle we’ve had them all destroyed. That thing’s a show piece though. It’s a historical paperweight. It’s more dangerous as a club (even the bayonette is dull) than as a gun.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Made me think of the is this a pigeon meme but the person being replaced with an American gun nut and the image being a referee to gun violence

With the text: “is this a responsible gun owner”

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/is-this-a-pigeon

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Actually, as someone who doesn’t have a strong stance either way, maybe I’ll just block you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

k bye

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Go ahead and block me too.

You’re saying all gun owners have incidents at some point, but that’s just availability bias. You don’t see stories on the news of the millions of gun owners who never have incidents.

I have also taken gun safety classes and never had an incident. My guns live in a safe and are only taken out when it is time to use them for sport, which hasn’t been in over a decade, actually.

No responsibile gun owner would use a gun firing to get the attention of a group, so the “all gun owners are responsible until there’s an incident” argument doesn’t really hold water here. The guy in the story broke several gun safety rules here. Rules that in my 10+ years of gun use I have never broken once.

Edit: not sure why this old post showed up in my feed. Oh well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Go ahead and block me too.

Done. And no, I didn’t read the rest of your multi-paragraph little hissy fit over a MONTH OLD POST. I despise gun nuts because they’re always the type of person like you that will butt into a months-old conversation you weren’t part of in the first place because you go around the internet compulsively defending your gun fetish. Fuck off, Cletus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The key word there is “seemed”

permalink
report
parent
reply

Not The Onion

!nottheonion@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome

We’re not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from…
  2. …credible sources, with…
  3. …their original headlines, that…
  4. …would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

Community stats

  • 7.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.1K

    Posts

  • 37K

    Comments

Community moderators