You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

Hey this is not a conflict at all , “Personal responibility” is complettly compatible with communism ,… have you ever heard of "the Wall " ?

permalink
report
parent
reply

actually the only reason that was justifiable was because the ruling class will only give up power by force

permalink
report
parent
reply

na

“obligation” - check out this word , its not big in Angloida Culture , but its important. there are certain “obligations” you have to fullfill … and when you dont … you lose “coverage” only the fullfillment of “obligation” comits the other party to fullfill its “obligation” as well. A Contract commits both Parties … Dont break it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I disagree some obligations you are still bound by whatever the other party does. To give a microcosm argument if your wife cheats on you it’s still wrong to beat her up.

Killing the romanovs was for the russians a sad necessity as otherwise they would have been weaponised and it was still a great wrong Nicholas and his wife less so but the kids that was actually wrong. It would have been far better to go the Puyi route or raise the children anonymously or something

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No! Not that kind of personal responsibility!

permalink
report
parent
reply