You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
20 points

Off the top of my head:

  • removing school lunch programs
  • removing women’s reproductive rights
  • dragging feet on legalizing marijuana
  • gerrymandering certain states/districts to keep one party in power
  • politicians being bought by the highest corporate bidder

Those are all pretty big ways in which the government hinders the population at large.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

how do I say this, but free school lunches are provided by the state, wanting less state is literally wanting no free school lunches, rights are also given by the state (the only inherent rights are natural rights, everything beyond might makes right is the state meddling in our lives)

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

No idea what your point is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Correct me if I’m wrong, but they didn’t say they wanted less state. Just for the state to do less bad things/things that hinder its citizens. That doesn’t mean they must oppose school lunches, unless they also believe that school lunches fit into that category. You can argue whether or not they do, but ‘you don’t want the government to hinder us, but X is the government hindering us, therefore you must oppose X’ isn’t much of an argument on its own.

Apologies if I misunderstood your comment tho.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

no they want less state because the ideology dictates that the state just does it worse, something that just isn’t born out by reality, case and point school lunches

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

I’m for small government so yes, I want less state. But school lunches is definitely one of the last things that should be cut. Since I’m fairly certain that in real world we’re never going to cut or fix the hundreds of things that are more wrong than publically funded school lunches, in practical terms I’m not advocating against them.

That said, just because school lunch is publically funded aka “free” does not necessarily make it good. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/healthier-school-lunches-may-have-curbed-childhood-obesity-new-study-finds/2023/06 – but again, that’s a detail problem that can be fixed (like it was here) without dropping that practice altogether.

And as for the other items in zargotext’s list, I pretty much agree with them too. But also excessive regulation, market distortions of every kind, poor educational systems, bureacracy.

If the context is USA, it’s an old country in modern terms. A lot of cruft has accumulated in 300 years and it’s not getting better. Ditto for many others.

permalink
report
parent
reply

solarpunk memes

!memes@slrpnk.net

Create post

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a “meme” here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server’s ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators’ discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

Community stats

  • 4.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 475

    Posts

  • 12K

    Comments