You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
74 points

Timer based interrupts are the foundation of pre-emptive multitasking operating systems.

You set up a timer to run every N milliseconds and generate an interrupt. The interrupt handler, the scheduler, decides what process will run during the next time slice (the time between these interrupts), and handles the task of saving the current process’ state and restoring the next process’ state.

To do that it saves all the CPU registers (incl stack pointer, instruction pointer, etc), updates the state of the process (runnable, running, blocked), and restores the registers for the next process, changes it’s state to running, then exits and the CPU resumes where the next process left off last time it was in a running state.

While it does that switcheroo, it can add how long the previous process was running.

The other thing that can cause a process to change state is when it asks for a resource that will take a while to access. Like waiting for keyboard input. Or reading from the disk. Or waiting for a tcp connection. Long and short of it is the kernel puts the process in a blocked state and waits for the appropriate I/O interrupt to put the process in a runnable state.

Or something along those lines. It’s been ages since I took an OS class and maybe I don’t have the details perfect but hopefully that gives you the gist of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

changes its* state to running

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

changes its* state to running

Oh, because its* a pointer to state-change. Good catch!

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

as a non computer scientist who is programming multitasking applications, you did a good job at explaining context switching :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

I think a lot of modern kernels are “tickless” - they don’t use a timeslice timer, and only context switch on IO interrupt, process yield, or when timeouts are specifically requested (including capping cpu-bound processes). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tickless_kernel

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Tickless means it’s not based on the computer frequency and idle CPUs can stay idle rather than being annoyingly brought into high power mode ever 100 Hz, but it’s still firing interrupts based on scaling timed variables.

They’re now called “Dynticks”

SUSE wrote the vaguely more understandable write up that Linux foundation links to: https://www.suse.com/c/cpu-isolation-full-dynticks-part2/

BTW, the Linux RCU code is evil but interesting: https://www.p99conf.io/session/how-to-avoid-learning-the-linux-kernel-memory-model/

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Fascinating stuff. Obviously a lot has changed since I took an undergrad OS class lol. Hell, Linux didn’t even exist back then.

permalink
report
parent
reply

linuxmemes

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules
2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of “peasantry” to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can’t quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

Community stats

  • 6.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 71K

    Comments