Odysseus, the first US-built spacecraft to touchdown on the moon in more than half a century, is tipped over on its side, according to an update from Nasa and Intuitive Machines, the company that built and operated the lander.

The robotic lander descended on to the south polar region of the moon on Thursday at 6.23pm ET. But several minutes passed before flight controllers were able to pick up a signal from the lander’s communication systems.

As it landed, Odysseus “caught a foot in the surface and tipped” said Intuitive Machines CEO Steve Altemus, ending up on its side.

Still, the lander is “near or at our intended landing site”, he said. Nasa and Intuitive Machines said they have been receiving data from the lander and believe that most of the scientific instruments that it is carrying are in a position to work.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
18 points

So Japens moon lander landed upside down, and Americas fell over. This isn’t looking too good for the future of space exploration.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Mars landers: are we a joke to you??

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Sometimes: https://www.nature.com/articles/43974

Okay fine that one was an orbiter, not a lander, but still.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Need to start launching from Australia at this rate. Maybe then they’ll show up in the correct vertical orientation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

We have multiple countries sending moon landers, and a few planning to return people to the moon to start a launching pad to Mars. A few accidents involving unmanned probes is nothing to worry about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

And this one wasn’t even a country per se, but a company. Though NASA has some experiments they out on the craft.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

True! Hopefully the manned missons land right side up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m much less worried about human piloted craft. It’s very difficult to program complex decision making and discernment. The astronauts present in the first landers will have been intensively trained in how to avoid catastrophe and will likely be able to come up with solutions on the fly if unanticipated things happen. Still dangerous, but hopefully less so.

It will be much easier to land completely automatically once we have landing pads, radar tracking, and other infrastructure present on the surface. It’s just hard to land a robot on an airless moon with a bunch of rocks and hills and shit everywhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

A few years back one crashed because the European team used metric and the American team used imperial. They are getting better…

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

AGAIN!

Because miscommunications on standardized measurements is apparently a recurring theme in aerospace engineering.

I’m in the US, I almost exclusively use imperial, but all my CAD models are metric, all my hobbies are geared for metric.

The fact that companies involved in multi-m/billion dollar endeavors can’t figure out “measure twice…”

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

>tries science

>uses imperial

???

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s weird to me that nobody noticed earlier

permalink
report
parent
reply

science

!science@lemmy.world

Create post

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<— rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

Community stats

  • 4K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.4K

    Posts

  • 15K

    Comments