A district judge in Wisconsin has sided with an 11-year-old trans girl over her use of the girls’ toilets and temporarily blocked school officials from preventing her access.

246 points

Good! Republicans need to get over their obsession with trans children’s genitals.

permalink
report
reply
-91 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

my parents angrily forbid me to do drugs or have sex and begged me not to drink to excess. Guess which activities I regularly engaged in.

I was threatened, beaten up, choked out and tortured in school for being “gay” (actually bi), and yet my (romantic) attraction to any and all genders even preceeded my understanding of any sexuality.

not my parents, not my fellow students, not exes, not internet strangers, not religion and not any form of media has managed to change my sexuality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

my parents angrily forbid me to do drugs or have sex and begged me not to drink to excess. Guess which activities I regularly engaged in

I too was vehemently forbidden, but I managed to understand how bad drugs and excessive drinking are and felt no need to rebel by “cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face”

Two people can go through the same environment and have completely different outcomes

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

What planet do you live on? Do you even know any trans people?

I know a LOT of trans people, and none of their parents were particularly happy about their choice to transition. At best they were begrudgingly supportive.

Nothing is pushing us to transition. Quite the opposite, infact.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-40 points

There are infact people who groom kids into trans ideologies. Primarily teachers. I’m not saying it’s common but it isn’t a lie. Additionally at such a young age kids are absolutely still finding themselves and transtrenders are a thing due to the extra attention you get these days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Who was making the decisions when I was a teenager that didn’t know transgender men existed, but I was still making plans to get a mastectomy and hysterectomy due to dysphoria when I was an adult?

Essentially from the time I grew breasts and started having periods I was determined to do it, even though I didn’t have the words to explain why I wanted it and everyone I told reacted with bafflement. My parents and community were southern baptist, there aren’t many less trans supportive environments in the US. Surely if trans kids are all groomed into it I shouldn’t have been able to come up with this on my own, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

That’s a pretty dumb saying, where did you hear that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Probably Tate or someone similar 🙄

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

There’s another saying: if you spout transphobic bullshit, you may be a redneck.

(With apologies to redneck allies)

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Conservatives are like vegan cats, fed the wrong shit so it’s all they can regurgitate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Are the meta users already bleeding into the fediverse? Go back to meta and enjoy your anti human echo chamber.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

my parents literally did not let me transition despite me begging them to. you’re wrong lol.

also (full offence) only someone who’s brain dead could possibly see a connection between those two things

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

There’s a saying about people like you. “you’re an ignorant cunt”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Read the WPATH Standards of Care. Decisions are made by the child, with the support and approval of the parents and a team of medical and mental health professionals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Not remotely compariable

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Trans toddlers, ya, but 11 years old is puberty age, that’s old enough to experiment with it

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

You are absolutely correct That’s what I was thinking of. Regardless, as long as they don’t give puberty blockers to children, it should be fine. But there are certainly consequences to children merely experimenting and being told that’s exactly the way they are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

Why the fuck did a mod remove my post? Are you guys so delicate you can’t take the tiniest bit of disagreement?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-125 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
217 points

As a father of two elementary school aged girls, I can tell you that they don’t give a shit. They would rather be supportive of their friend. People who insist on perpetuating outdated concepts of gender roles and modesty are on the wrong side of history.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-35 points

It is good your daughter’s are good with this. Would be nice if everyone was. But do you think all the girls or even the majority are comfortable that need to use same bathroom if they know someone might be biological male?

permalink
report
parent
reply
123 points
*

Your thought is valid.

But what I wanted to tell you is that based upon my kids, their friends, and other people’s kids that I know and talk to - very VERY few of them give a single fuck about this sort of thing. Like surprisingly few.

It’s refreshing, because it’s truly no big deal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-86 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

My teenage kid said, when presented with an lgbtq+ issue, “That’s a your generations problem. Grow up.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

the kids are all right

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

Cool. I hope you don’t misconstrue that to think that it happens everywhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

So you think we should ignore the concerns of less confident girls and boys that are uncomfortable with it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

The kids don’t give a fuck. It’s the backwards parents who can’t get their mind out of the dark ages that are ‘uncomfortable’.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Can u honestly imagine being incensed by a fellow human being going to the bathroom? It’s ludicrous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Something separate, but equal?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-68 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

The 11 year old girl the judge sided with is one of the “little girls being uncomfortable with it”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I wish I could boost this again

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Lol, good one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points
*

This discomfort usually comes up if you expect a trans kid (most likely trans girl) to show their genitals (usually a dick) to you or your kids. That does not happen. This is what conservatives want you to think though when they ban trans kids (or even trans people of all ages) from using the toilet matching their gender.

This doesn’t happen because most of the time trans people are not comfortable with their genitals anyway. But even if they are: They don’t show their genitals because they want to take a dump in the toilet.

Besides: I find the confidence of conservatives truly remarkable that they think that a trans woman will go around and show them their dick. Conservatism is not sexy for us at all, nevermind sexy enough that we get naked on the spot.

You know what is sexy enough to make us undress on the spot? Consent! There’s nothing more sexy than a consenting partner!

Also what dismalnow said.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

It’s about the discomfort of adults who don’t want to think about things that are different than what they learned is “normal” when they were growing up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

11 year olds aren’t generally the ones giving that many fucks. Remember that most boys have only just entered puberty by that age, literally no one reasonable is expecting the bag of hormones that is, say, a 16 year old.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I’m honestly really fucking disappointed someone would take the username uncle_iroh and just use it to be a malignant cunt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

completely off-topic but even with all his good qualities, Iroh was actually kinda sexist and probably contributed a great deal to Azula’s aggression and compulsion to prove herself as a worthy successor to the throne of the fire nation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

In what fucking world do you live in where anything he just said would justify being a “malignant cunt”. Happy to see this place is just reddit 2.0.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

I work with kids. They only give a fuck about shit like this if their parents make a huge deal about it. Trust me, they do not fucking care otherwise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

I’m a cisgender male and would much rather take a shit in a stall next to a dude with a pussy and a beard than take a piss at a urinal next to a woman with a dick, and I think women would probably rather take a piss next to someone who looks like a woman than next to someone who looks like a man. As long as the transgender person in question is dressed as their identified gender then I highly doubt any reasonable person will give a shit about their presence in the bathroom, unless women like to inspect eachother’s genitals in there or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Exactly what is dressed as their gender require? Are you suggesting transgender girl has to wear a dress or makeup or some defining cloth? If she decides to come to school in jeans and button shirt she must use the boys bathroom that day?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Cis isn’t real bud, it’s made up. You are male.

permalink
report
parent
reply
137 points

Good lord they are only 11 years old. Who cares what bathroom they use.

permalink
report
reply
106 points

Make them all unisex. If it’s a large facility with a bunch of stalls or a small facility for only one person, make them all unisex.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I went to a club with only one, huge, unisex bathroom once. It was… like any other bathroom. Seeing people of the opposite gender wasn’t really a concern anyways.

Since it was a rather yuge bathroom for a yuge club, if there was any shenanigans going on there would’ve been plenty of witnesses to call it out.

There was even one guy who went piss at a urinal, and started to leave without washing his hands. All the other guys started shouting at the guy to was his hands lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

I support this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You could go take a shit together on your first date

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Yes. And get rid of that creepy door gap while you’re at it

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I hate those gaps

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s only America that has pervert friendly toilet gaps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

To be fair, there is safety in numbers and consequently I also see a benefit to combining them. I’m a dude, and I would rather walk down a busy pedestrian mall than a sketchy half-empty street or an urban trail on a moonless night.

Same thing with bathrooms. I imagine women feel better in a bathroom where other women and other people are present and aware, vs a nearly empty bathroom where a creep could walk in and isolate them at any moment. I’ve been to places with large unisex bathrooms (hot springs, spas, etc.) and there’s enough people in there that no one is gonna try anything stupid/inappropriate without being immediately noticed. Bathroom troublemakers are a small subset of the universally large group of people who have to use the restroom anyway.

I only support gender-segregated bathrooms because I don’t want a bunch of chicks clogging up the mensroom with their slow pissing/shitting/bloody paper towels on the floor. :D I am unreasonable and self-centered, but anyone who has ever been to a concert knows which line is longer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

…so you are going to take away my urinals, my fast turnaround time, and my silence?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

They can put urinals in a unisex restroom.

In fact, there are all sorts of things in public restrooms that are unused. For example, the last restroom you visited had a sink where you could have washed your hands.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

In my hypothetical example, when you pictured stalls, you pictured them with only toilets inside. You didn’t even consider that there could be a stall with just a urinal.

You may enjoy sidling to the trough and gazing at your competition, but some of us appreciate not having creeps trying to size us up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Your urinal privilege has been pissed away.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Pretty much only conservatives. They’re actually pretty obsessed with thinking about children being raped in bathrooms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

We need to separate the bathrooms by function!

Number ones on the left number twos on the right!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Now the problem with that would be that then people would only use the pissing bathroom, because who would want to poop with other people? I sure wouldn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
102 points
*

gender neutral bathrooms are the answer here.

most public places have them now, don’t get why you can’t have one in a school.

permalink
report
reply
42 points

In places with large crowds, gender neutral bathrooms (assuming you also mean single-use) don’t really work. It causes massive lines.

Not to mention, there’s no need. It’s a bathroom. Why does anyone care who they pee or poop next to? It seems so silly and arbitrary to me. Just get in, do your thing, wash your hands, and get out. haha

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points
*

We can have gender neutral bathrooms where we have a shared hand-washing area, and individual stalls. Heck, you can even have cameras pointed towards the sink area if people are so afraid of getting harassed in the bathroom. Gender should not matter when you have individual stalls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Right? I’ve been using public restrooms for a long time and I don’t recall ever seeing anyone’s naughty bits.

…and for me the most ridiculous part of this discussion is that bathrooms have never been a secure space. If some creep wanted to go into a bathroom to harass people, there is literally nothing stopping them. It’s not like bathrooms have guarded entrances and now people have a sneaky way to get into a bathroom by pretending to be transgender or something insane like that.

It’s literally a manufactured issue to get the GOP electorate terrified, as everything they do is designed to do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The best compromise for neutrality and efficiency is to keep gender neutral stalls but also retain an area with urinals which will be much quicker for large numbers of men to pass through then using stalls, and also saves water.

The other consideration would be that the stalls will need to be sufficiently screened that people in them don’t feel overlooked or vulnerable (I’m looking at you USA with your weird gappy stall building!).

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I was at a concert at Red Rocks Amphitheatre and they had gender neutral single stall bathrooms with a shared sink area. It was great. Sure, there was a line, but there was going to be one anyway. However, it ensured 100% utilization, when potentially one side would have less than 100% usage when the other has a line. It’s ideal for places with large crowds.

(The stalls were also well built basically single rooms, not the shitty American stalls with gaps in them.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It works perfectly, it’s just more expensive to construct. In some Nordic countries there are very few places with bathroom stalls, they either have lots of single-use bathrooms or completely walled-in rooms (wall from ground to roof, regular door) with a toilet and then sinks outside to wash your hands. Works in shopping malls, airports, schools (from small elementary schools to huge high-schools, I’ve never seen one with stalls). The only exceptions I can think of that have stalls are amusement parks, some sport arenas and (ironically) IKEA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

How about single occupancy? No one cares if you use the wrong port-a-potty.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Because it’s not cost effective

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

All this bathroom talk is just a bourgeois plot to make us all rent bathrooms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You mean like how it used to be in the US decades ago? You very much used to have to pay to use public bathrooms until a bunch of students protested it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

I’ve never understood why I should care where someone else goes to the bathroom anyways.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I also agree with the judge in good faith, however it raises some questions about the authority of the school system. Schools are known to not give kids the amendment rights like them being able to search your backpack or locker and most states have laws that demand that kids go to school which limits their freedoms, we all know why that is, but the judge has barred the school from using this power and gave it to a kid. Someone might go through the verdict and see how reaching this is, but it is interesting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-88 points

I wouldn’t want my boy showing genitals to women on a bathroom. Viceversa too

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

I don’t know what bathrooms you’ve been in, but nobody is showing anyone anything in the bathroom. In most cases people who are trans use stalls anyways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-42 points

Most is not all and source of that statistic?

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points
*

What world do you live in that you see other people’s genitals in the bathroom? I’ve never had this issue, none of my friends have, and I doubt you could provide any significant proof that is an issue. You just hate trans people. Say the quiet part out loud.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Wait, you mean you don’t just drop trou the second you get into a public bathroom? That’s crazy, my girlfriends and I are always asking strangers to look at our crotches before we pee.

Wait no, that’s never happened once in my 39 years on earth. I’m really curious about what bathrooms republicans are in if loose genitalia is the constant threat they make it out to be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I think the quiet part that needs to be a bit more out loud is that while all the fingers are pointed at trans people over creeping in the ladies’ room, the resulting ‘bathroom panic’ gives cis men cover to go into the ladies’ bathroom to police who’s trans or not in there and it’s totally not creeping when they do that, nosirreebob

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points
*

Maybe teach your boy not to show their genitals to people in the bathroom because that’s actually weird af? I swear the people against this are telling on themselves. You’re a bunch of bathroom perverts and you think it’s normal/everyone does it. Because I have never once in my whole life seen someone’s genitals in a public bathroom. You looking for it or what?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

That’s exactly the point. The judge sided with the 11 year old girl so she wouldn’t be forced to use the boys bathroom with your son.

This is some good Accidental Ally material.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

But if the same happens with men you’re cool with it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

Same equipment and the possibility of accompany to your boi or girl gives you the extra coolness 😎

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

As a male, I’ve learned long ago when I step up to a stall next to another dude, I’m not supposed to look at their genitals. As it turns out, dudes don’t like when other dudes look at their junk. As a result, I’ve never had another dude showing me their genitals in a men’s room.

Come to think of it, if I had a choice, I’d probably rather a woman looked at my junk in the bathroom than a dude…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah and that’s the point, to keep it that way. No transsexuals indecently exposing themselves or perving on unconsenting kids or adults on bathrooms. Thanks for agreeing on that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

Imagine holding in a shit for months as a court determines where you can poop.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

The best I can do is 3 days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I see what you did there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Just shit in front of the door. Someone will move it to the correct toilet eventually.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Wait I think I found a solution the Lemmy no poop challenge…

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 438K

    Comments