Pfizer will list its COVID-19 treatment Paxlovid at a price of $1,390 per five-day course when it soon hits the commercial market, the drugmaker confirmed to Axios.

Why it matters: Paxlovid’s new listed price, first reported by the Wall Street Journal, will be more than twice the $529 paid by the federal government, which until now has maintained the entire U.S. supply of the key antiviral medication.

-41 points

Apparently it really doesn’t work as well as it claims to, so maybe this will drive development of a better antiviral.

permalink
report
reply
64 points

It has an 89% efficacy rate in reducing hospitalization and death among the unvaccinated. I’m sorry that’s not “good enough” for you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

I’m just going off the information that my health care provider gave me. She said they only use it on high risk individuals because it’s not as effective as claimed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Might want to find a new health care provider.

She may be taking you for a ride.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

It does work, amazingly. I had Covid a few times and took Paxlovid the last time. It works better than any drug I’ve taken. After taking the first dose, there were no more Covid symptoms within 4-6 hours.

The problem with Paxlovid (besides the cost) is that it gives you a new set of side effects: weird joint and muscle pain, a metallic taste in the mouth, etc. They’re better than Covid though. And it won’t kill you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Yeah man, nothing ever happens

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

Just because it worked for you doesn’t mean that the effectiveness in their trials represents real world numbers. I’m not pulling this out of my ass, I was told this by a medical professional.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

don’t feed the trolls dude. what you’re saying makes perfect sense. people are just blinded.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

There are many types of “medical professionals”. Only a vast minority actually read and interpret trial data.

I’m going to trust my direct experience with the drug (I know it works) and real world studies like below.

Conclusions: This study suggests that in the era of Omicron and in real-life settings, Paxlovid is highly effective in reducing the risk of severe COVID-19 or mortality.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35653428/

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I was told this by a medical professional.

What about all the medical professionals that disagree with your medical professional?

This is why people like you should keep quiet on matters they know nothing about. If you want to understand something, you have to research it yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I had fucking ashtray mouth AND covid rebound, I wasn’t impressed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-156 points

Remember when the COVID vaccine came out and all the “nationalize healthcare” mfs started worshipping pharmaceutical companies as the greatest thing in history? Pretty funny, huh?

permalink
report
reply
151 points

Magnificent! You’ve successfully constructed and attacked a straw-man by conflating economics with medical science, and displayed your total ignorance of … everything … in the process…

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points
*

…no? Because that didn’t happen. “The” vaccine was multiple different ones, including some made in China and the UK.

permalink
report
parent
reply
85 points

No, I don’t remember that. I feel like you’re making stuff up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-39 points

Here ya go. My point being is that two years ago if you criticized pharmaceutical companies as still being greedy, soulless corporations you’d be laughed at and shadow banned for daring to insult our world’s saviors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Lol. I’m getting second hand cringe. Please stop.

permalink
report
parent
reply

What even is that link supposed to prove?

permalink
report
parent
reply
89 points

Remember when the COVID vaccine came out and all the “don’t nationalize healthcare” mfs started making up strawmen to argue against because they have no idea what other people actually want for society? Pretty funny, huh?

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Understanding is a generous word to use for them I think.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

What a clown comment. Other countries with universal healthcare pay significantly less for care and pharmaceuticals than Americans because their governments handle the negotiations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Weren’t the vaccines mostly paid for by the government?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I did not pay a cent. Got 3 shots.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

If the government paid, you paid through taxes, you just didn’t pay at the counter when you got them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

you pay taxes though, do you not?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

I’m guessing you’re an antivaxxer? Everyone still recognized the bs Pfizer and Moderna did during the pandemic. The world is not black and white, bad companies can still do things that benefit society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

everyone I dont like is a nazi

Wrong. Got vaccinated within the first month of vaccines being given to the public and got boosted last week

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Why did you use a quote and not use any of his words, or even the gist of what he said? At no point in that comment did he approach saying that

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Fucking monsters, capitalism is a fucking cancer

permalink
report
reply
25 points

this is fucking criminal

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Maybe. Definite grounds for violation of price gouging laws unless another producer can easily fill the supply gap, which is entirely reliant on how much time is left before the change AND the availability of production methods which are beholden to intellectual property laws.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

it’s criminal on a human level, not a law level. idgaf about gouging laws. charging $1400 for something that can be lifesaving is fucking criminal. especially when it’s more than DOUBLE what the govt was paying for it. If you want to know how much a human life is worth to these fucks, start here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well I wish morality equaled legality, but sadly the two are separate. It’s disgusting, abhorring, incorrigible, foul, etc. But its legality is dependent on the regional laws.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Honestly 1400 for a 5 day course of this is more reasonable than I expected. It’s still unreasonable, but I just figured it’s be way higher.

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 526K

    Comments