85 points

I got an email yesterday telling me times have never been better to refinance my home. They swore that they could get me a number that was more than double my current rate.

permalink
report
reply
45 points

I chuckle evily whenever I get a call from my mortgage company asking me if I’m happy with my mortgage. At 2.25% darn right I’m happy being below the current risk free rate of return.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Never been better for banks maybe. I refinanced during the pandemic and went from a 30 year to a 15 and barely changed my monthly payment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s normal. You either cut years or cut monthly payment. Very rarely both unless rates are actively dropping.

A 15 yr saves you six figures over a 30 yr iirc so congrats!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I mean they are literally just taking your money and telling everyone it’s a good thing. Fucking wild man. My buddy has a second property that went up from $1700 a month to $2700. Insane. That some private entity can one day decide people have too much money and just literally take it.

And capitalism is the way???

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

There seems to be a lot of context missing because this does not make sense. A private entity has no say in what you pay after you purchase a property. Unless there is a private entity doing tax assessments. Which I’m hoping would be extremely unusual but I’m only familiar with the process in my area.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

break even?
makes it sound like like they’re talking to investors not residents.

i dread to think how their “anslysis” works.

cant bear to do any more than skim this article though.

permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

I’m not sure I quite understand what that means how would they even know if I’ve broken even or not?

I own my house but the only way I would know if I’d “broken even” was to constantly get it evaluated. Also is their analysis assuming that I’m going to do improvements or not?

Because you can buy a house, own it for 6 months and sell it again for a profit, and you can do that if you do renovations. Equally you can buy a house own it for 5 years and sell it and make a loss because you’ve not done any maintenance or renovations in that time.

I know for a fact the person I bought the house of hardly made any money on the sale because the roof has a giant hole in it. Obviously that brings the price down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

assumptions for closing costs, agent fees at the time of sale, home maintenance costs and interest payments

Break even being your house has increased in value by the amount you’ve spent on those expenses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So it takes 13 years to get out from being upside down on the loan? Yikes

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Based on the actual Zillow report, it’s just based on home values across the board in different regions. So, these are averages. Of course, if you make more improvements and stuff, your result would vary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

My house is an investment in the sense that I’m putting money into a giant hole as opposed to an infinite hole like renting. But no, I don’t view it like I would a stock.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Back in the 50s to 70 we teeated hoises more like food. No one bought up all tge bread at a grocery store in hopes of selling letter at a high profit. During this time houses inflated mostly along side wages.

The the dark times came. The risr of the secondary real estate market ment people couldcquickly trade mortgages* like stock. This decoupled house prices from wages and turn te whole 2nd market into a new stock market

*technically they are not mortgages but mortgage back securities

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You can just click through to the actual Zillow report instead of Yahoo’s article about it: https://www.zillow.com/research/years-to-profit-33215/

They discuss the analysis right there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
1 point

How did Zillow do this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’m not saying he’s right, but Zillow started buying a ton of properties during the pandemic for significantly more than they were really worth in the hopes of flipping them for even more money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Zillow over payed for houses, then couldn’t sell them as quickly as expected because the COVID housing market took a down turn, and so they sold them at a loss, lost millions of dollars, and closed the house buying business. They also made plenty of low offers or under-payed for houses at times. They were trying to break even on home value on the hole, but couldn’t reign in the wild swings of gains and losses. Their entire business model was based on the seller fees, not on the house value.

In any case, they closed that business in 2021, and has since sold the rest of their inventory.

I don’t see how that would have a lasting effect on housing prices though. I’d attribute it more to a housing shortage due to people buying up real estate, and keeping it as rentals. Even when operating, Zillow aimed to resell houses within 3 months, not hold on to them as investments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

“That’s what one real-estate agent claims in a video that went viral on the social-media platform TikTok”

Hardly a compelling source.

" he’s suggesting that companies such as Zillow are using the data they glean from people’s perusal of home listings on their sites to make decisions about which houses to buy as iBuyers."

Based on what exactly? Zillow used publicly available information about houses, just like everyone else does. Zillow traffic patterns had nothing to do with it and really wouldn’t even be useful for that. Buying decisions were based on home value and forecasted ability to resell, not derived interest based on page views.

“Gotcher later argues that the company will buy 30 homes at one price, and then purchase a 31st home at a higher price. “What that just did is create a new comp,””

False. Zillow literally excluded houses that it bought from its comps to avoid that bias. I know because I wrote that code.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Just 13 years?

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Was about to say. Why kind of not 30 year fixed loans are they offering now?

Even paying an extra 1/4 of my mortgage monthly only reduces it to like 22 years vs 30 lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It isn’t the amount of time it takes to pay off the house. It is the time it takes not to loose money on selling a house. The number was about 5 years when I purchased my home. You take the selling price of your home subtract the mortgage, taxes, and realtor fees. It now takes 13 years before you can sell your house and break even. This just makes investing in homes worse. It also makes buying a home more risky and inflexible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ahhhh now I get what you mean. Thanks for the clarification.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Why does it not crash?

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Too many companies with deep pockets buying everything up to rent and then never selling. Once a company buys it, it’s pretty much off the market forever unless that company goes bankrupt but then they either get a bailout or another company buys that one for cheap.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

It never will. If it so much as dips, the ultra wealthy will buy up everything they can find, inflating it once again.

Regulations could stop it easily, but profits are apparently more important.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Along with what the other comment said, all the people that are buying that aren’t corporations can actually afford the house they’re buying largely due to the WFH change so they all moved out of cities with their large salaries and moved to low cost of living places, took all the affordable housing and since there’s no economic collapse they will continue to be ok (thankfully I guess?) so there won’t be a housing crisis other than the unaffordability crisis which isn’t a crisis to capitalists it’s just a feature of their market based system.

The solution “the market” chose was neofeudalism… Can’t buy, only rent. “I take your income forever and continuously raise the rent until you can’t afford it and then the next schmuck moves in. Where you go, who cares? Not my problem.” Lovely society we have…

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Why would it crash?

There’s near limitless demand and deliberately limited supply. Any dips will come from lack of affordability on lending as interest rates rise, but you’re talking hyperinflation for an actual crash.

So the house prices might drop by 20%, but you’ll be able to borrow 20% less. So if you’re fucked before any price drops, you’re still fucked afterwards.

permalink
report
parent
reply

A Boring Dystopia

!aboringdystopia@lemmy.world

Create post

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

–Be a Decent Human Being

–Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

–Posts must have something to do with the topic

–Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

–No NSFW content

–Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

Community stats

  • 6.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 848

    Posts

  • 28K

    Comments

Community moderators