Quote: “We must teach Israel a lesson, and we will do it again and again. The Al-Aqsa Deluge [the name Hamas gave its 7 October onslaught - ed.] is just the first time, and there will be a second, a third, a fourth. Will we have to pay a price? Yes, and we are ready to pay it. We are called a nation of martyrs, and we are proud to sacrifice martyrs.”

12 points

Yeesh, this is gonna get a looot uglier.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Each side is making it as ugly as they know how to. I’m so sad that this is 2023. Have been hoping that everyone would come together for a solution on this since Clinton.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It is mind-blowing that people defend these monsters.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Who’s doing that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points
*

Many people are calling Hamas “freedom fighters” and outright defending its actions. I would say a significant portion of Fediverse users fall into this camp, from what I’ve seen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

We’re simply calling for the stop of oppression and genocide and ethnic cleansing, if that constitute supporting Hamas then you be you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

A majority? Well, you’re either lying or you have a severely distorted view of reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I have never seen anyone supporting hamas, at most justifying the legitimacy of some of its objectives and the right to fight for them, but not its actions; always being critical of hamas and its war crimes.

In fact, high tolerance or even open support for war crimes is something I have only seen on the zionist side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
0 points
*

said Israel is entirely responsible for all unfolding violence.

Mostly true, not supporting Hamas.

called it innovative Palestinian resistance

It’s innovative, and starting the attack when the occupation soldiers have just moved to terrorize the West bank is pretty smart.

called the attacks exhilarating and energizing

Eh, maybe if that was said on the first day of the attack, but it got ugly quickly. They almost sank to the IDF’s level.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Over 30 Harvard organizations

Student groups.

Almost all muslim student groups.

Who immediately got denounced hard by every other Harvard institution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You’ll find a lot of comments along the lines of the Hamas government and Hamas terrorist organization being fundamentally separate entities. You’ll also find a lot of people dismissing the claims in articles like this one or trying to paint anyone in Hamas inciting violence as ‘not important’.

The idea is to foster a narrative to paint Israel as ‘just as bad as hamas’ and while Israel has done many bad things, the gap between the two is massive. I think it mostly comes from a desire to paint one side as ‘good’ and one side as ‘evil’ which isn’t always easy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s a good point, Israel has done a lot more damage to the people of Palestine than Hamas has to Israelites.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

no they don’t. people just don’t like hospitals and refugee camps getting blown up

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

Not really.

Go back in time. Hamas was originally created in 1987 to fight for Palestinian lives and rights - because Israel government kept oppressing and murdering (men, women and children).

Whenever Palestinians would do anything back, they would get oppressed real quick (probably violently?).

If peaceful revolution is not possible, violent revolution is inevitable.

What do you expect Palestinians and Hamas to do - sit tight and die?

EDIT: Seeing your other comments to people and calling some “tankies”, just shown me that it is if no use to actually discuss/ argue with you.

So I will only leave it with this comment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

To try to justify “violent revolution”, the targets of that violence can’t be innocent bystanders.

Gong up against police or military targets, ok I can see the argument there. Explicitly massacring civilians though is abhorrent. Yes this sentiment can be applied to both sides of the conflict, that should not give either side the green light to wantonly massacre civilians.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I’m not justifying it, I even condemn what happened on October 7th. But I’m not surprised.

1948 up to 2023 being oppressed, driven out of land, homes and being murdered (men, women and children) on a daily basis.

That drives people nuts, at one time -It will just break people and people will do something. That happened.

If Israel didn’t continue to do all these horrendous deeds, this might not even have happened. Hamas was literally created in 1987 to fight for Palestinians lives and rights - because Israel kept doing, what they’re doing.

It is just really sad to see the way it all goes.

I just wish both sides would ceasefire.

EDIT: correcting spelling. Typing in the night without glasses, isn’t a good idea. I suppose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Everything in this conflict started with pure intentions before becoming corrupted. Zionism started when a prominent Jewish writer, following pogroms of Jews in Russia, opined that Jewish people would not have peace or respect unless they had their own country. And then radical nationalists perverted it.

I don’t think Zionist terrorists should get a pass though because they originally wanted a place to live free of persecution – by your logic, they had to do that, because peaceful revolution was not possible for them.

Hamas needs to go. They have stockpiles of food and water they aren’t sharing with the civilians there, and they’re taking aid that’s meant for Palestinians. Hamas is not their freedom fighter. They’re using the Palestinians to wage war against Jews.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You pretty much took one part out of context and placed into your own way.

Hamas was created because Israel kept pushing Palestinian out of their own homeland. 4 Palestinian people died in 1987 by an Israeli driver, due to that Palestinian people started to uprising because Israel occupation.

“Hamas need to go”? How about let Israel stop with their genocide, stealing land, homes and the purpose murdering of men, women and children?

Realize if Israel didn’t steal everything from Palestinian people this entire thing wouldn’t have happened. Hamas wouldn’t have been created, Palestinian people would’ve been living in peace.

Curious question to you; what would you do if Israel stole your land, homes and murdered your entire family and friends - with the world’s presidents just staring?

Don’t get me wrong both sides are wrong, both kill innocent people. I condemn both. But it started when Israel stole land, that’s the start of the tragedy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You are outright lying. In the first few paragraphs of Hamas’ founding document, it clearly calls for the “obliteration” of the state of Israel. It’s about genocide against Israel, not “Palestinian lives and rights”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

People tend to forget that one of the key justifications for Hamas splitting off as a distinct organization was that they felt their former parent organization was not supportive enough of open violence against Israel. Also important to note, the initial charter classifies diplomatic solutions as a waste of time and war as the only possible answer.

Per your genocide comment, I’m guessing you’re talking about the hadith advocating that Judgement Day will not come until they have killed all Jewish people everywhere. It’s very rough, but do want to note that there is a much later statement indicating the possibility of living in peace with other faiths as long as they are never ever challenged. But… this is also sandwiched between a call for everyone to join them in jihad and a callout to a document with questionable provenance detailing a plot for the jewish people to take over the world.

Anyone can read the whole charter online, obviously translation bias is a thing, but the translations I’ve seen out there are very harsh. There are items in there about ‘Palestinian Lives and Rights’, they’ve got notes codifying the status of women as lesser and taking jabs at anyone advocating for women as doing it just to make them look bad. There are a few random items in there that do look harmless at first glance, I’d encourage everyone to at least take a look through it, it’s not very long.

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points

We are called a nation of martys, and we are proud to sacrifice martyrs.

“Some of you may die, but that is a sacrifice I’m willing to make.”

permalink
report
reply
62 points
*

Meanwhile this guy lives it up in Qatar

the tunnels are only for Hamas btw

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*

Sadly dude doesn’t really know what he is and should be fighting anymore, and young people die for him 🤦

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
1 point

you’re sick in the head

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 227K

    Comments