Former President Barack Obama cautioned against ignoring the complexities of the Israel-Hamas war, warning that “all of us are complicit.”

“If you want to solve the problem, then you have to take in the whole truth. And you then have to admit nobody’s hands are clean, that all of us are complicit to some degree,” he said in an excerpted interview with Pod Save America released Saturday.

142 points

And he’s 100% correct.

permalink
report
reply
36 points
*

Thank you so much.

This is way more complex than it’s getting credit for.

It always has been.

Anyway, I miss having a better leader. He was just so presidential. Not perfect, but no one can be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-39 points

he was a piece of shit. an eloquent neolib piece of shit. easy to reminisce about the better times when the last 2 presidents have been trash.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Who were the top three presidents in your mind and why?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-69 points

Even the dead children?

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

What does this even mean?

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

They’re trying to do a “gotcha.” What they mean is, “Are even the dead children responsible for the situation they were in?”

It’s a fallacy; appeal to emotion. Obviously the dead children aren’t reading this, or hearing the words that “all of us are complicit.” Instead of thinking as a rational person would that the audience being addressed by those words are the people to who that phrase would apply, they did a rapid-fire, emotion-based response because they want to feel right and superior, instead of taking the mature, nuanced approach.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
*

@roofuskit
That’s what I thought when I saw the headline but he’s actually talking about state actors when you read the context:

“All this is taking place against the backdrop of decades of failure to achieve a durable peace for both Israelis and Palestinians, one that is based on genuine security for Israel, a recognition of its right to exist, and a peace that is based on an end of the occupation and the creation of a viable state and self-determination for the Palestinian people,” he added.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Especially the dead children. They were obviously bad because they chose to get born into the wrong place. Jesus hates them and had them killed for a reason. They should have chosen to get borned into a nice white Christian family in America.

  • some dumbass cracker evangelical, probably.
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

yes, even the giraffes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
79 points
*

This is bad news for Israels current course of action. When the guy who was popular (enough that the current guy could “best friend” his coat tails into office) starts saying this stuff loud enough for everyone to hear, it’s intentional. This looks like more subtle public distancing and changing of narrative.

The former president argued that it was important to acknowledge multiple seemingly contradictory truths: Hamas’ actions were “horrific,” but “the occupation and what’s happening to Palestinians” were also “unbearable.”
Obama previously spoke out on the conflict, saying in a statement that any actions by Israel that ignore the human cost of the war against Hamas “could ultimately backfire.”

Israel and it’s supporters should be sobered by this soft diplomacy. It’s very much aimed at them and the timing should make it clear that they are being isolated.

permalink
report
reply
57 points
*

Funny they never say this kinda shit or act upon it when they have any actual power. Like Eisenhower and his military industrial complex speech.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

It’s also pretty rich coming from guy who thought drone collateral was not a problem in Afghanistan.

He’s lucky we wasn’t president during the last time there was a huge Israeli-Palestinian blowout, otherwise he’d have a 1:1 comparison with Biden.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Voluntarily releasing reports on civilian casualties doesn’t seem like they thought it wasn’t a problem

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The ones where every male above 18 was just classified as a terrorist?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

“Sorry everyone, look how bad we are. We killed all these people, and we’re going to kill more. Aren’t we bad?”

That doesn’t really show any concern.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

What makes you say he didn’t think accidental civilian deaths were a problem?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They didn’t stop him from doing the drone strikes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

He was the only president to drone strike American citizens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Presidents/Prime Ministers become beacons of morality once out of office.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Or in Obamas case, Nobel peace prize winner > War Criminal > Beacon of morality

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

when they have any actual power

Spoiler: they don’t. Elected presidents can’t speak against whoever would successfully lobby to impeach them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

the babies on respirators in gaza hospitals are.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Hamas is hiding in their premature baby bodies

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

correct. when two groups wage war it’s the people who suffer

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*

Wasn’t that Hamas who did the Al-Ahli Arab Hospital bombing? Though it’s debatable.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/03/briefing/gaza-hospital-explosion.html

And while much about the hospital explosion remains unclear, the available evidence points toward a Palestinian rocket, not an Israeli airstrike, as the more likely cause.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Even if it was a misfired Palestinian rocket, which still isn’t proven btw, it doesn’t outweigh the 30+ hospitals that Israel has bombed to this day, or for that matter the fucking refugee camp they bombed last week.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I mean it does though because of the claim of 500 dead bodies that magically appeared and then (not a joke) dissolved like salt into water once it was clear it was IJ at fault and not the IDF.

Israel has largely been pinpoint with its strikes and when you compare it’s released maps of Gaza’s tunnel networks from the last war with the BBC’s map of its airstrikes it’s very clear what they’re doing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

or for that matter the fucking refugee camp they bombed last week

I was confused by this initially too (I read the headline and imagined a tent city for people fleeing this current war, but then the photo was of a city block with like 5 story buildings) but it’s only called a “refugee camp” because it was originally a site where refugees gathered after the 1948 war, in the modern day it’s more or less an urban neighborhood of Gaza with a population (at one point) of 100,000 just like any other part of the city

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think hospital bombings on both sides must always be taken with a grain of salt… because if you are in a war and are highly unethical; where is the best place to operate a military base from, if you want to protect it from bombings?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Holy overreaction batman! PSA: don’t be a dick.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points
*

Honestly, the whole truth of the situation is that the subjugation and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians was a direct byproduct/prerequisite of the creation of the Israeli state. We will get nowhere if nobody addresses this fundamental aggravant at the heart of this conflict, that formed the basis for the militarized apartheid system that exists there today. These are just pithy quips about “nobody’s perfect” coming from somebody with olympic swimming pools of blood on his hands.

The reality’s that the only people with the real vision to create peace in this situation have long been sidelined from the political discussion. I’m really encouraged looking at stuff like https://www.odsi.co/en/ that actually understands the fundamental problems going on here. We’ll get absolutely nowhere listening to the political establishment in the U.S. or Israel that spent most of the last century manufacturing this situation.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

Yes but none of us were alive when it happened. Now there’sa nuclear armed ethnostate literally surrounded by (to them) existential enemies, and it just so happens they speak English gud and like the same brand of deity, and let wonder woman move to Hollywood.

Shit is fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 476K

    Comments