Eighty national public health groups, including the American Heart Association, the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Preventative Medicine, placed a full-page ad in Sunday’s edition of the Washington Post in support of a federal ban on menthol in cigarettes and all flavored cigars.

“The answer is clear,” the full-page ad says. “Saving lives starts by ending the sale of menthol cigarettes and all flavored cigars.

“Smoking kills nearly half a million people in the United States each year, and these addictive, deadly products are a big part of the problem. The FDA and White House have our full support to release lifesaving rules prohibiting menthol cigarettes and all flavored cigars.”

69 points

When are we going to start banning flavored alcohol like White Claw and Mike’s while we’re at it

permalink
report
reply
32 points

Please don’t joke this into existence

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

It worked out so well the last time we tried.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Menthol and other flavoured cigarettes were banned in the EU years ago, and I don’t recall much of a fuss, not sure why this would be an issue in the US.

My experience was that long time smokers weren’t the ones smoking menthol and other weird stuff, it was mostly kids that didn’t like tobacco.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

There ain’t to laws when you cracking claws.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That would just result in people making their own mixed drinks. Kinda pointless.

Flavored cigarettes and cigars are more challenging to DIY

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

You do have a point but the danger is far higher on the tabaco side. Priorities and such, we won’t see anything like that for quite some time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Is it though? I’m pretty sure alcohol is the most destructive legal drug there is. But prohibition didn’t go so great last time so don’t take that as a call to start banning sweet alcohol, I just disagree with the assertion that tobacco is worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

According to global statistics, Alcohol was responsible for 5% of global deaths, while tobacco squeaked past with 8% of global deaths.

https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/29/2/200/5407688

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

I’m suggesting that the negative health effects are more pronounced with tobacco.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The real priority is to work to eliminate the power of public health to dictate private life choices.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

I have maybe a cigar a month. Sometimes, a nice dipped cigar is enjoyable. It’d be a shame to just outright ban them.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

I sort of feel like this is the equivalent of banning white claws or even everything other than IPAs. During the summer I have a cigar most days. Once the temps drop below 60, I’m done with tobacco for six months or so. I don’t smoke flavored cigars, but I don’t like it for those who do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Welcome to the ‘all drugs are bad unless I do them’ mentality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Yeah, it’s unfortunate. I understand it. The flavours do make smoking more enticing to young people, who might not limit themselves to one cigar a month like you do. But it does suck to ban something outright just because some people will misuse it. Mind you, nicotine is addictive, which is a pretty critical facet to this (though I don’t think anyone starts smoking without knowing this risk).

I dislike smoking in general and do want things that are good for society as a whole. But the logic of banning stuff like this seems similar to, say, banning fast food because some people will overeat (or more extreme, having calorie rationing so that people can’t overeat on any kind of food). It’s admittedly always a balancing act for how much danger is acceptable before we just ban it for everyone. Some bans using this logic are very reasonable, some aren’t, and many are extremely debatable.

I think I currently prefer the sin tax approach, especially since that best accomodates occasional usage. A hefty tax makes the dangerous thing less accessible to impressionable young people and helps pay for the social cost (though IIRC, smokers actually cost society less because they die younger, reducing the many medical costs of old age). Price influences people’s choices, too. If healthy food is cheaper than unhealthy food, that encourages buying healthy stuff. But even sin taxes are imperfect, especially in a vacuum. They can make the cost of living higher for a vulnerable population. They need to be planned carefully.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

Tobacco is fucking horrible, but Menthol and other flavorings make it so much worse. They increase the likelihood of addiction massively.

And is always the case in public health, you don’t put in rules to cater to the edge cases, you put in rules to protect the majority affected.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Because Prohibition worked out so well they first time. But yes, let’s learn that lesson again, it’s not like we haven’t been having it reinforced over the last half-century with the War Ear Drugs.

But this time it will be different, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Tell me you’re not a smoker without telling me you’re not a smoker.

You clearly have no idea how tobacco addiction works.

Prohibition doesn’t work. Mind your own fucking business.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-33 points

I can tell that you’re addicted just by the vitriol in your response here.

Did you start of menthols and other flavored tobacco? Because that’s how a lot of people start. Which is why people are pushing for a ban, so others won’t be as hopelessly addicted as you are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

We need to ban public health

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

Urgh, when they banned them in my country it was with this same stupid logic.

Now I don’t smoke (quit 15ish years ago) but this idea that anything flavoured somehow MUST be for the purpose of marketing towards children is insane. It manages to be wrong in two opposite ways:

One: This implies that anything with flavor is not for adults and everyone over the age of majority goes home to enjoy our grey flavourless mush.

Two: This implies that the flavors involved must be what appeals most to children. You know those menthol and whisky tipped smokes that all the children go nuts for.

This logic falls apart (both ways) when you look at any other legal market like booze, weed or vape.

It is almost as if after the US lost the war on drugs they want to try again on a smaller scale.

permalink
report
reply
-6 points

The flavour makes it so more people start. So it is good to ban it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Does it? I have not been convinced. Also by that logic why should other not healthy things be flavoured? Why can you buy flavoured malt liquor, weed gummies, vapes or edible panties? With this same logic junk food should taste like sadness and regret for the future health of the children (won’t someone think of the children).

How this does not come off as ludicrous to anyone makes me question my own sanity. If smoking was such an issue and potential future addiction had to be stopped, banning the nicotine (you know the addictive) makes more sense then allowing the sale of the same addictive product as long as it does not taste minty.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Have you ever smoked a flavored cigar? Yeah, it tastes just like cherries or grape or cognac or whatever… right up until you light it. And then it tastes exactly like tobacco. Just like all other tobacco. Trust me, flavoring tobacco like anything is not the part that makes “children” want to keep smoking it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

This is hypocrisy. Let people smoke whatever they want. We’re not living in the fifties, everybody and their mother knows nicotine kills.

What they don’t get is that not everybody has a wonderful life and wants to live forever.

There are bans in place for kids, and adults should have the right to decide what they want. Ban flavoured alcohol too then.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Ironically nicotine doesn’t kill, bud. Smoking does. I get what you mean but there’s no downside to nicotine other than addiction strictly speaking

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

You know, I don’t really care what you smoke, but I care that it’s communal. Somebody drinking wine, beer, a white claw, etc a few feet away doesn’t immediately negatively impact my existence by depriving me of clean air … or cause a friend with breathing issues a panic attack.

Plenty of adults “decide” to smoke for kids by smoking with the kids around.

Plenty of adults “decide” to smoke in the entrances of buildings, on busy sidewalks, in an outdoor mall, etc.

Plenty of adults have “decided” to smoke because it’s “safe” per some anecdote that they heard about a family member that smoked 3 packs a day and lived to be 90.

It’s actually all pretty freaking infuriating. One of the best things that’s ever been done is banning smoking inside of most buildings.

At the very least the age should be raised to match alcohol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

We see fewer and fewer of the adults you mention with each passing day.

I recall as a child seeing adults smoking all the time. Now it’s a rare occurrence.

At the very least the age should be raised to match alcohol.

Jesus fucking christ, you people…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So the takeaway is that the health warnings are right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/12/style/smoking-cigarettes-comeback.html?smid=nytcore-android-share

Yet, in 2020, for the first time in two decades, cigarette sales increased.

That’s not just an unsubstantiated “feeling.”

At the very least the age should be raised to match alcohol.

Jesus fucking christ, you people…

“You people” as if you know me.

In any case, the whole point of alcohol being 21 is that by 21 A) you’re not talking to that many people who are still in high school/not yet 18 and B) you should be making better decisions.

Which has a net effect of lowering the amount of people that engage in these behaviors, because it doesn’t spread as much in high schools.

Now, maybe that doesn’t work as well as “we” (society) thinks, but if we still think it’s a good idea for alcohol it absolutely should apply to cigarettes and vapes. Vaping was supposed to help people stop smoking, not create a whole new problem.

If you’re smoking cigarettes, and you’re proud or happy with that decision as an adult, you are an outlier among outliers. I can’t say I’ve ever met someone that smokes cigarettes that hasn’t tried to completely quit at least once (with the exception of the guy who believes “they’re completely safe” despite all the information to the contrary).

This isn’t alcohol where the majority is split between people that happily consume alcohol in small quantities vs a subset of alcoholics. This is a thing where it’s universally harmful to the smoker, to the people around them, to the environment (cigarette butts), etc. It’s also much more addictive than alcohol and marijuana where people need smoke breaks. It’s just a regrettable mess from when society didn’t know better.

permalink
report
parent
reply

At the very least the age should be raised to match alcohol.

FYI it has been, on a Federal level (in the US), since 2019. Donald Trump of all people on Earth signed that into law. The legal age to buy cigarettes and to buy alcohol in the US is the same, 21.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Wow, I missed that. Good catch!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
0 points

Good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Sorry but it’s a witch hunt at this point. And don’t get me started about drunk people wanting to grope me every time I go out.

Where I live, every workplace has a designated area where you can smoke. Indoor smoking is forbidden.

The drinking age here is 16, so is buying tobacco. There really aren’t that many smokers anymore. Most kids vape or smoke pot.

Also if your friend has asthma, I don’t know, stay away from smoking people you see? It can’t be that hard.

Also, I started smoking because I was bored. Now I keep smoking because I want to. I’ve actively stopped kids in my family from starting with it, so I’m not trying to say smoking is ok. Just leave us be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

What a stupid fucking comment lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Sure I’m fine with both bans, alcohol not only kills yourself but many others too. The only reason it’s not illegal is because it’s ingrained in society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The only reason it’s not illegal is because it’s ingrained in society.

What about the history we learned from when it was illegal?

You… did learn from history, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Could you clarify your point? You think flavored cigarettes are just as ingrained as alcohol?

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

People who think smokers smoke for the flavor are not in touch with reality. This will do nothing for public health.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

I think it will. It will drive menthols underground and they’ll become more dangerous just like alcohol during Prohibition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You can just buy menthol infusers online. This law will do nothing

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Some start for the flavour which is the issue

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 524K

    Comments