186 points

“When a defendant honestly believes he can’t possibly get a fair trial from the judge, one of the tactics is to antagonize the judge to a point of causing reversible errors,” Dershowitz says. “That is what happened in the Chicago 7 case, and I was one of the lawyers on the appeal in that case. Abbie Hoffman provoked Judge Hoffman to such a degree that the judge made mistake after mistake. And courts of appeal often reverse convictions or verdicts when the judge has made serious errors.”

What a dick. This does not sound like the legal process at work at all. Besides, innocent people would never do this.

permalink
report
reply
57 points

The tactics have included attacks on Engoron’s court clerk, filibustering the prosecution’s witnesses with repetitive questions, and raising legal arguments the judge had already specifically prohibited.

Responding to these provocations with contempt charges is correct and proper. Any appeal court judge is going to see that Trump was treated with kid gloves here.

And it kinda doesn’t matter what political party the appeal judge is. They really don’t like people being disrespectful to them and ignoring their orders. It’s like the number one thing all judges hate. This strategy will probably not work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I don’t know about that last part so much. Current conservatives have shown that there is no level that they won’t sink to and no level of hypocrisy they won’t espouse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Caveat being it is to further their own lust for power. The second they are on the receiving end serious injustices are taking place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

It’s so dumb that an appeal for a mistrial can get the whole case thrown out rather than simply retried with a different judge

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

At this point, his strategy is to delay, delay, delay, get elected, and pardon himself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Most mistrials are retried from the beginning. I imagine it’s mostly the cases that involve misconduct on the judges behalf that get throw out, as that’s a strong argument for a 6th Amendment violation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
115 points

As the article mainly states, this isn’t just because Trump can’t help it but also as a strategy to make it easier to get a favorable appeal. Plus, it would stoke his favorite way to portray himself, as a victim, and fundraising:

there have been recent conversations among some of Trump’s 2024 campaign brass of how much of an immediate fundraising boost they would enjoy, if a New York judge were to try to put Trump in a cell for even a minute. “All the cash in the world,” one Trump political adviser says.

permalink
report
reply
98 points

I think the solution here would be for the judge to go after Trump’s lawyers. From the article they’re engaging in some of this behavior themselves, in addition to encouraging it in Trump. But, they want the optics of Trump getting imprisoned in order to play victim and try to help an appeal. Seems the judge could side step that and go after the lawyers instead, who have more to lose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

Winner winner chicken dinner!

Lawyers are officers of the court and she can grab them by the short and curlies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

She should remand the entire Trump legal team to the jail for a day, and require Trump to stay at his home for that day as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points
*

Can the judge jail the lawyers for repeatedly violating his orders? They should know better than to antagonize the court.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Sure. A judge can hold anyone in contempt of court, and they can fine or jail them for any length of time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

But could you hold a lawyer in contempt of court for something their client tweeted? That doesn’t seem likely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It seems like putting a lawyer in jail would just be a recipe for delaying a trial though. They can’t be expected to provide defense if they’re locked up. Or do they just require you to find new counsel?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I am far from an expert, but I don’t believe so. The court can fine them or maybe recommend them for censure and disbarment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Yeah… Trump political advisers seem to be correct all the time…

permalink
report
parent
reply
91 points

According to two sources familiar with the matter and another person briefed on Team Trump’s legal strategies, the former president and his lawyers are intentionally trying to provoke the judge into a nuclear-level overreaction.

This? Is the plan?

That’s like saying you’re going to kill a dragon by hopping into its mouth.

permalink
report
reply
53 points

Overreaction?

How is it an overreaction when any normal person would have been tossed in jail months or even years ago?

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

Normal people don’t have a few thousand people out there waiting for an excuse to shoot people.

But they should jail Trump anyway. When you have such a dangerous following, it’s even more important that the law come down hard.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They’re already finding excuses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

How so?

Those are supposed to be independent examples of how rich people get richer, but yes, they can do all of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The whole “well-organized militia” thing is kinda biting the US in the ass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
According to two sources familiar with the matter and another person briefed on Team Trump’s legal strategies, the former president and his lawyers are intentionally trying to provoke the judge into a nuclear-level overreaction.

I think Trump’s legal strategy is he knows he’s lost already. He’s going to be fined and run out of business. So is his only hope is if he and his lawyers are obnoxious dicks and provoke a reaction to force a mistrial or grounds for appeal. Also he can whine about “witch hunt” and the usual nonsense to his base if he’s found in contempt or held accountable for his actions. Expect this nonsense to happen in his criminal trials too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think Trump’s legal strategy is he knows he’s lost already.

I’m pretty sure he has lost already and guilt has been legally decided. This is to determine the penalty. FTA:

Engoron ruled in September that Trump’s financial statements contained fraud.

This trial is to determine the depth of the fraud, and importantly, the consequence appropriate depending on the outcome. The whole strategy now is to delay and get to appeal probably with the number one goal being to get elected again and create a legal quagmire, or simply ride out the rest of his years until his milkshake-filled arteries realize he hasn’t ever had a heart and the only thing that’s been pumping this long is pure narcissism.

This is, sadly, probably the least stupid thing he could do, because the more facts you learn about Trump, the more you’d think his fetish is just bending over and getting fucked by a strap-on wielding Lady Justice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

If the judge loses it bad enough, they can claim “judicial bias” and have a pretty clear path to mistrial/appeal. Given the situation, it’s probably the best play they have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Any normal defendent would be in jail though, probably before the trial even started, but definitely after calling a judge names while in court. I’m simultaneously shocked and not at all surprised he isn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Why would he have been in jail prior to trial?

They don’t do pre-trial detention for fraud, and the only way for this trial to lead to jail time is a (deserved) contempt charge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

If the lawyers get disbarred then Trump gains time but the lawyers’ careers are fucked

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

To be fair it does work if you have an immovable rod and a DM that honors rule of cool.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

“Step 1, I hop into the dragon’s mouth. Step 2, ???. Step 3, the dragon dies and I emerge victorious! There are no holes in this plan at all!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

Dude needs to stand before a firing line, not go to jail.

permalink
report
reply
17 points
*

That’s a lil extreme my guy

Edit: what fuckin world do we live in, where someone says that a politician needs to be shot to death, and the controversial opinion is to not shoot someone? Am I crazy for thinking that killing trump wouldn’t solve anything? We shouldn’t give people a martyr. The best way to get rid of someone is by shaming them and forgetting them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points
*

“Furthermore, 18 U.S.C § 2381, states that a person guilty of treason against the United States “shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What a crazy variation in punishment for treason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

When he says that on a fringe social media platform it’s “lil extreme”

When Trump says that 5 thugs need to be put to death, who were found Innocent, it’s just an opinion everyone is allowed to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Uh no, that’s also an extreme opinion. Death is always an extreme opinion, because there’s no way to change your mind. Death is a permanent solution to a temporary problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Not sure about this really. You have a great point with the martyr risk, but then again, if Hitler had been executed in 1924, would the whole nazi thing have fallen on its face? Trumpism (much like Hitlerism) is a person cult. Perhaps killing their leader is exactly the kind of thing what people like Trump supporters respect and positively respond to.

The best way to get rid of someone is by shaming them

I think we can be pretty certain that this strategy is not working against Trump. Unless you find a shaming angle that actually works against his supporters. I have no idea what that could be since just about every angle that would work on normal people has been tried out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I started typing the Hitler comparison before seeing you beat me to it.

Well said.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Honestly, if Hitler had been killed on Aug 29 1939, the Nazis might have done a lot better than they did. I don’t think his generals would have marched into Russia the way he did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

To respond to your edit:

Death as a punishment for treason would do a lot to stem the tide of treasonous fucks that are currently holding high positions in our political system.

The time for leniency is OVER. And making a martyr out of a huge sack of shit is just fine- let more of those fucks step out of line and see what happens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Do you really think that’s how it’d go down? You might want to rethink that one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I think it is more towards the fear of him becoming re-elected and death – while indeed extreme – would prevent such an outcome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Hm actually no. I’d prefer to not be a crazy person. Thanks for the offer tho. Enjoy your killing spree. I’ll watch it on the news later

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Not really. It’s in line with all US laws to ask for the death penalty

18 U.S.C § 2381, states that a person guilty of treason against the United States “shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”

Considering the scope and impact of his crimes. It would be reasonable to ask for the maximum punishment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I agree, we should throw him in prison for the rest of his life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m 100% with you

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He may be a politician but he’s also a criminal and I think that would be the punishment for his crimes not for being a politician. Although hes a pretty awful politician too lol that’s not a crime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s as though people want a civil war.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Boy let me tell you something about our founding fathers… This man tried to destroy our democracy, he deserves to die. However, for the sake of our civilized society I would prefer to see him rot in jail until he dies in the most unglamorous way possible that way he can’t be made a martyr.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Blanket Party, and everyone in the nation gets 15 seconds each.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points
*

I guess he is daring NY Judge, because it is a civil case.

He probably should have his release conditioned on gag order in federal cases. And he should be jailed if he breaks it.

If the fear is that his fans will riot, newsflash: they follow identity politics, they don’t care how guilty trump is. Whatever they plan to do, they will do it anyway. So either treat him like you would treat anyone else for similar crimes or just forget about trials and let him do whatever he wants without any consequence. Because there’s no point in wasting time if he can’t be punished.

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 19K

    Posts

  • 495K

    Comments