20 points

Give them a bunch of nukes and biological weapons and after they arrive send a message to the PRC

“Just a fyi, we sent them a 100 but they only received 80. Be a real shame if Taiwanese operators had planted them in randomly selected cities on the mainland.”

It will be hilarious way to end the world.

permalink
report
reply
5 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The ultimate end of the world song. Just as the canisters release Covid-20 through 30 plus airbourne HIV

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Covid-20 would mean it started in 2020.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Música, maestro!

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

There’s a theory that Taiwan could achieve mass destruction with just regular cruise missiles, no need for actual WMDs.

The destruction of Three Gorges Dam would kill millions of people from the resulting flood. Be a tough target and air defense would be a nightmare, but it is still within Taiwan’s cruise missile range.

There’s been no acknowledgement ever of this plan, but it’s pretty obvious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Good. Even if nobody likes 'murica, their weapons work well enough to deter China from doing something stupid.

permalink
report
reply
-17 points
*

Imagine if the roles were reversed, and it was China arming i.e. Panama. How would you feel then?

(Because the USA has done a lot of "something stupid"s as well).

Edit: Folks, you can analyze the bigger picture without being a tankie. It’s unfortunate that so many ex-Redditors would rather block and report any display of critical thought

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

.ml means ‘Marxist-Leninist’. From their about page:

“In particular, I would like to see someone (or a group of people) create a mainstream, or liberal instance. That should help to avoid further drama, and avoid attempts to turn lemmy.ml into something that it is not.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The one other one is a democracy, despite being a flawed one. The other, an unabashedly totalitarian state. And before any CCP apologists comments and nevermind what the domestic Chinese think, ask South Korea, Japan and South East Asia what they think of the Chinese Communist Party claiming the entirety of South China Sea and sending armed merchant vessels and the Chinese navy bullying other Asian fishermen in the region. Not to excuse American imperialism, but it’s clear which is the better option for many.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Taiwan is a full democracy, not a flawed one. At least according to the widely respected Economist Democracy Index.

Taiwan is more democratic than Canada and Germany. And a lot more than the US, but that’s not surprising.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

ask South Korea

너 지금 한국에 사는 사람한테 답하는 거야…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Why don’t we ask South America, the Middle East, and Vietnam what they think about the US?

but it’s clear which is the better option for many

… American tax dollars are at this moment funding the genocide of Palestinians.

EDIT to add: I should clarify I’m no CCP apologist, nor do I uplift China as an example of what we should strive for. But I also really get tired of seeing America put on a pedestal. America was built on genocide, slavery, and exploitation, I don’t see how it should ever be an example of how to do things better, BECAUSE that line of reasoning (“at least we’re better than them”) has been used to justify many of the horrors of our history.

By using that bit of propaganda, you’re contributing to things like Americans looking the other way/enabling - for the past 75 years - genocide. It’s the same “they’re savages” shit that was used to justify literally the most savage acts against Native Americans.

Our democracy also isn’t actual democracy. By definition, a democracy must represent the will of the people. Ours does not. It is already a failed democracy, and has been for my entire life. America also produces more propaganda than any other country. Do we have more personal freedoms in many areas than people in China? Absolutely. Are there many areas throughout society where I think America has pushed the world forward and made it a better place? Absolutely.

But I’m getting really sick of seeing America compared to China just to say “we’re better”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Gives me Cuban Missile Crisis vibes.

I’m not as happy that the US sells arms, but I’m convinced by the geopolitical climate that arming Ukraine and now I might add arming Taiwan is better for the world than worse. Refilling Israel’s Iron Dome is probably a good idea too, though we are yet to see what the US sends and how defensive or offensive those weapons we send are.

There might be better comparisons though in the weird chess games we played in the middle east with Russia. They armed some insurgents, we armed some insurgents, etc. Afghanistan was a disaster for Russia too, though it was worse for us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

If you’re comparing China/Taiwan circumstances to USA/Panama I’m sorry but I cannot call that a critical thought. The only similarity is proximity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Imagine if the roles were reversed, and it was China arming i.e. Panama. How would you feel then

False equivalence, Panama’s risk of being suddenly invaded in the current political climate is nearly zero. Taiwan (is #1), on the other hand, has to be ever vigilant. Also, Panama doesn’t house the ‘rightful’ government of the US.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

How about Cuba, then?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points
*

Obviously they’re different. But failing to empathize when given the analogy shows either the inability or unwillingness to understand China’s position.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Countries helping arm one another is good. Every country should have the capacity to defend itself. My country got steamrolled during WWII because we had few and outdated wapens

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

As an American who knows how evil our government is, I would be like “good for panama but also China is probably not doing this out of justice and freedom”

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Neither is the US. We’re doing it because Taiwan is a strategic ally

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

That’s fine! We should not invade Panama. I don’t think the US is currently planning on it, but after the last 20 years I’m pretty sure most citizens would be fucking glad for any excuse for our military to think twice before invading a foreign country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

There’s only so much they can do if Taiwan is unserious about its own defense. Exhibit A: the fact that eliminating conscription has apparently turned into a bipartisan consensus in Taiwan, in spite of the hollowing out of Taiwan’s military. Who exactly is going to be operating all that expensive military equipment?

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Wtf you talking about?!?! They raised the conscription age to 40. I just have friends who just finished their conscription. The mass majority of us already consider ourselves independent. We have our own currency, our own government, our own laws.

Best believe if Xi bear attacks, we are stepping up to beat those China-nese scums.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points
*

Conscription period used to be 3 years, then 2, then 1, then 4 months. Finally it became too obvious that 4 months is a joke, so it’s being grudgingly raised back up, but only to 1 year. Still barely time to get any proper training done; for comparison, Israel’s conscription is almost 3 years and includes women.

The Taiwan government also persistently underpays military service members. The result is that it never hits its targets for professional (non-conscript) personnel, then wrings its hands about it…

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

That’s very different from your “Exhibit A”. Pretty far from what you said about eliminating conscription. Ya sure it’s 1 year now for now. The military thinks it’s enough for now. We pay the government for their expertise. We trust them here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

One year is barely enough to get proper training?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

That was the entire point behind the “One Country, Multiple Interpretations” status quo, though?

The KMT was opting for economic integration and the CPC was ramping down their rhetoric, then the DPP comes in, fucks around, and finds out that a global superpower does actually have military power.

Reminder that, in recent history, China only crossed the Taiwan Strait median line after the US was allowed to conduct a FONOPS through the Taiwan Strait and declared it to be international waters. Prior relations between China and Taiwan dictated that the Taiwan Strait was territorial waters with dispute over who’s territory it was - the median line was used for this interpretation.

All this is to say: the status quo is breaking down and the US is happy to push against clear Chinese red lines, just as they were happy to push against clear Russian red lines. Meanwhile, we already know what the US would do in a similar situation: we can simply look at Cuba or towards any of the governments that the US has couped in South America.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You write like you haven’t paid attention to the whole Hong Kong situation at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Very few actually do, as evidenced by the fact that almost none of them draft women for any role or duty, except for less than a dozen (only sweden and norway on equal terms).

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

Is there any active or potential war the US isn’t paying for?

permalink
report
reply
-2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Removed, rule 4, racially loaded language.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

The bulk of the US economy is based on taking money from working people and then consolidating it to billionaires that run defense corporations. So “paying for” it’s basically just an engine for making rich Americans more rich.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Are there any it hasn’t?

kind of /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

If China invades Taiwan our entire economy will come to a screeching halt. Hence why America is interested.

If China wanted to invade, idk, Thailand, we’d just kind of shrug and say “Hey, don’t do that.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Yes. Syria, Yemen, Libya.

Yemen: US funded, Saudi Led Anti-Houthi Rebels in Yemen. The Saudis fighting with Hezbollah. Wait I think we did sell weapons to the Saudis lol. The conflicts in and around Turkey. Congress has [blocked arms deals to Turkey](blocked arms deals to Turkey), but Biden has tried to make it happen. We are arming Ukraine, but not arming other countries in the former Soviet bloc that would probably enjoy more independence from Russia right now. We’re not arming Africa which aims to stop piracy, stop foreign boats from dragnetting their shores, and has some internal conflicts with governments and insurgents. We aren’t arming Mexico to stop the drug cartels. (Although US citizens frequently arm the cartels).

And don’t worry, Europe has arms to replace now thanks to the Ukraine-Russia war. US Plans to Backfill the Donated Arms.

Yeah you can pretty much look up “US sends weapons to X” and get a positive result that we have indeed. We are also actively stopping Syria, Iran, Turkey, and Russia from arming more rebels whenever we can. US siezes Iranian Ammo, Sends to Ukraine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well, all those General Dynamics and Raytheon shareholders deserve maximum return on their investments, according to St. Friedman.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

The US is paying because it needs Taiwan. If Taiwan didn’t have value for the US, it would have been overrun by China a decade ago

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

israel and ukraine as well. it’s no coincidence that right next to a powerful country (or, in israel’s case, a bloc of countries) that the US is unfriendly with there is a client state whose entire existence depends on Western funding.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s not so much that the US needs Taiwan, Ukraine or Israel, it’s that they oppose China, Russian and the middle east.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points
*

Well Taiwan can either go with the US or China. They’ve been wanting to stay independent from China for a while now so I don’t think it’s much of a surprise.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Taiwan’s policy under the KMT was one of economic integration - under the KMT government, both sides were happy under the status quo. Under the DPP, it’s been one of military provocation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Long before the DPP took power, China started an enorlous increase of its military. As well as its territorial ambitions. I don’t think it’s China that’s afraid of being invaded by the Taiwanese

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Have you looked at a map? China is literally encircled by US military bases. Are you surprised that they’re participating in that arms race?

China and Taiwan share the exact same territorial ambitions. That’s a matter of shared policy. Those territorial ambitions also consist of… Literally, uninhabited wastelands and uninhabited rocks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Almost all countries other than USA, Russia, and China have to pick a side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m highly biased but that seems like an easy choice, geography notwithstanding.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I mean yeah, but the EU is also an available Option

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So US then?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

When it comes to military, EU is basically NATO which is led by USA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

It is, but I wouldn’t count on our potential to wage an effective modern war in functional cooperation with the many countries in the EU. Especially when it is a war taking place out of Europe and not a defensive action.

A militaristic endeavor would surely be held up and manipulated by opposing countries within the alliance, just like it is now with economic decisions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

I mean Russia is pretty close to needing to pick a side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-26 points
*

Well, their economy isn’t collapsing any time soon. And they managed to destroy modern military systems supplied by NATO.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 283K

    Comments