48 points
*

The FBI’s political surveillance was not a result of popular hysteria, such as scholars used to claim, or a rational response to communist spying and the Cold War confrontation, such as a number of historians have recently argued. Instead, it was an integrated part of the attempt by the modern federal state, rooted in the Progressive Era, to regulate and control any organized opposition to the political, economic and social order, such as organized labor, radical movements and African-American protest.

  • Red Scare: FBI and the Origins of Anticommunism in the United States, by Regin Schmidt, PhD

The FBI working against progress shouldn’t really be surprising when this is what they did in their formative years. It’s a big mistake to think we were stupid in the past and that we’re above doing what we used to do, today, and I’m really starting to wonder if intelligence agencies actually are a net positive the more I read about them, at least they seem like they’re well overdue for some radical reforming to ensure they act in the best interest of common people, rather than whatever they’re doing now and historically.

permalink
report
reply
16 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thinking of this from the prospective of “why have an IT department we don’t need them everything is working”. At least hopefully they have mitigated / prevented similar events you listed and we just never heard about them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Afaik:

They had info on 9/11 but didnt put the pieces together.

The BLM protests… Are protests? Do you want the feds to stop protests? Don’t worry, feds were on the scene doing all kinds of random shit like entrapment and interrogation and whatnot.

They did see Jan 6th coming, but basically chose not to interfere.

Why keep them? Theoretically surveillance can be useful. Its hard to justify understaffing and downsizing. I’d choose complicit. A lot of feds are fascist. They’re smart, unlike cops, but they’re evil just because of pathology or whatever. TBH the kind of person the FBI recruits would likely be even more dangerous if they weren’t agents.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Federal investigators foiled a massive bomb plot brought on by ~20 domestic terrorists who immigrated from another, restless, country and thought that wanton destruction would somehow galvanize support FOR their position on the conflict back home.

Can confirm that OUR feds are worth their (really small) pay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I’m really starting to wonder if intelligence agencies actually are a net positive

All of them, for the ruling class.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points
*

Who do we trust?

None. Everything this country taught me as truth was a lie, unless one has enough money to look the other way. It’s like talking to HR at work, nothing changes but they’ll still try to win you back with more lies.

They breed terror so they can come back to be a hero.

permalink
report
reply
11 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

The Deep State at work. It has always served conservative interests and established power.

permalink
report
reply
-5 points

Then why is the FBI hunting like 01/06 animals like a fucking Terminator? Still nailing those fuckers, seems like one every day, even after nearly 2-years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Maybe poor in the grand scheme of things, but these were mostly middle-middle-class and higher income people.

It’s like the 9/11 hijackers. Middle-class Saudis almost every single one.

In neither case were they uneducated, backwoods hicks. These were mostly people with a life, and much to lose, and pulled this shit anyway. And I find that far more horrifying than a buncha poor, angry dirt farmers, because poor stupid people can’t much traction in this world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s the DOJ prosecuting them. Are the FBI still finding them? I thought since there’s video of almost all of em, its mostly about using the courts to put them in prison and make deals to get info on those who couldn’t be identified.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

It’s not very deep, the FBI has a lot of checks and balances for raids.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

In order to obtain a valid search warrant, the FBI must have probable cause. If the FBI believes there is probable cause they will present it to a magistrate (a judge). The judge will then decide if there is sufficient information to issue a search warrant.

Checks and balances.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Fbi, dhs and cia need to be destroyed and remade with real oversight.

This happens too often

permalink
report
reply
13 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 480K

    Comments