117 points

I think the headline is framing this wrong. Apple is not threatening to kill these services.

Apple is refusing to break their services just to accommodate broken, stupid laws written by a broken, stupid parliament.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

I get concerned when companies like Apple uses the “We won’t break our application for demands of one country” argument as Australia, France, the USA and possibly other countries are either planning or already have similar legislation.

The right argument to have is the one that says “this is just plain wrong!”. That is a much tougher needle to thread though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Careful there, expressing an honest take about an Apple decision instead of trying to spin it like it’s evil is a good way to piss a bunch of people off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Considering Apple has no problem bending over backwards for dictatorships like China. Do you think they’ll do anything other than to server their finances?

People regurgitating company PR bullshit is fucking cringe.

this “careful, you might…” cliché makes you seem like you spend too much time online. Add something constructive to the discussion, rather than virtue signaling.

No company is looking after your best interests, except when it aligns with their financial interests. You take that out, they’ll sell you out to the highest bidder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

My brother in Christ, I don’t know who it was that hurt you but it wasn’t me. Being this emotionally invested in disliking a company is definitely not good for your mental health. Nobody here is even remotely suggesting that any company cares for anything other that maximizing profits. That doesn’t mean that there are no companies that maximize their profits by having a reputation for privacy and security.

If you don’t think my comment was valuable, downvote it and move on. Nobody wants to hear someone cry about how mean the big bad computer company is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

I rarely think Apple has done the right thing, but in this case they seem to be putting the privacy of their users above demands made by third parties, which is good.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Apple has a long history of being unwilling to bend the knee to govt requests.

I’m glad to see them taking a firm stance on this. I’m curious to see what the shareholders think if this happens, as one side of the coin is detrimental to their UK growth, but the other would result in their name being tarnished.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Not for China. For example nytimes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Yeah, let’s wait if UK calls their bluff. Not that I think UK is right in this case, it’s just that people who make decisions in Apple are spineless pieces of shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Time for a federation of messengers. The XMPP protocol is ready and waiting for you.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Now we’re Jive talkin’!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

There are many servers to choose from:

  1. Prosody
  2. ejabberd
  3. Openfire
  4. Tigase
  5. MongooseIM
  6. Metronome

They are easy to set up, and low on resources.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

there are many fediverse alternatives, but honestly they’re deserted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

That’s true. But it’s nice to have an account on a federated messenger and use it with a couple close contacts, as you won’t feel affected by the constant threats to centralized services.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Good, as a UK resident I hope Apple, Signal, even WhatsApp stick to their guns over this issue. It’s the only way it will gain any traction with the public.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Also make sure to let your representatives know how you feel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Please write to politicians that you support it, because they are hoping to make them back off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

it will not make changes that it characterises as “a serious and direct threat to data security and information privacy” for users around the globe

That’s the thing right there. If Apple makes a back door for the UK, they would have difficulties keeping only UK citizens affected. Communications are global. Even if they restricted the back door to conversations involving UK residents, every private group chat that resident user enters becomes snoopable just by that user being there and the history could be made available from before the user entered. It would be like a privacy virus with UK residents as the spreaders.

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@beehaw.org

Create post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 3K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.3K

    Posts

  • 81K

    Comments