95 points

Title: Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings is Utterly Awful

Article: Look at me. Look at me. Hey, Internet, over here. I said something controversial. Pay attention to me.

permalink
report
reply
17 points
*

Right. When people say “don’t feed trolls,” this is the contrarian bait they’re talking about. Not assholes and bigots.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well yes, but don’t feed assholes and bigots either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Calling out bigots and assholes isn’t “feeding.” That’s the problem. Telling people to ignore outright bastards just leads the bastards to escalate. You should absolutely identify their bullshit and bluntly tell them where to shove it - and more importantly, forums need to allow calling out bullshit.

Any moderator demanding “respect” and “civility” is creating an environment where cautious monsters have free reign, unless they also proactively fight politely-phrased abuse. If someone has good reason to say “fuck off,” and you remove the response but not the cause, you are a force multiplier for that abuse.

But this schmuck? Yeah, ignore that. It is of low quality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

That’s a bit mean. Why aren’t people allowed to have genuinely held opinions anymore? Why is everyone who disagrees with you faking?

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

There are some sadly misguided individuals who think LotR movies are actually good. This post will dispel that unfortunate delusion.

That tone of arrogant superiority is why. This is clearly rage baiting, it would have made it to the second sentence without insulting its potential audience if it wasn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

Maybe the author is just really upset and feels the need to be mean about it. I don’t see the need to be mean back, condescension in an article never hurt anyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The trick is this to have genuinely held opinions without publishing poorly written articles about it. I do that all the time, and I can warmly recommend others to try it, too!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I think talking about one’s opinions is human nature and it’s pointless to oppose it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
90 points

If the article starts with “seriously”, you know to not take it seriously.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

Seriously, that is great advice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Seriously

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

That guy sounds just like my dad.

While I’m all for criticism where it’s due, harping about something for decades doesn’t make you any more fun to listen to.

permalink
report
reply
43 points

Almost every teenage goes through a phase where they think that criticizing things makes you sound smart. I did it. I have a teenager going through it right now.

Some people never grow out of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

There is a certain age where it just feels right. I wish I knew the cure, but maybe it’s just something people have to go through.

Maybe finding something to be happy about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

The first trilogy is great.

The second trilogy ran about 5 hours too long.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

I saw a pretty good three hour cut of all three Hobbit movies. I don’t remember what it was called, but I think they only used like 20 min of the last movie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’m guessing not much of Fast and Furious: Minecart Racing made it into that cut.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Maple Films’ edit is pretty good. Chops out the majority of the dwarf backstory, all of the wizard side quests, and significantly cuts down the superfluous action sequences, resulting in a strong narrative which follows Bilbo’s story exclusively, as it should.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

don’t get me started about that cringey romance arc too…

permalink
report
parent
reply

The animated Hobbit movie from the 70’s is still better than the Peter Jackson trilogy just on the music alone.

But his LOTR trilogy is better than the animated LOTR one. I mean… It at least finished the story.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think there’s an animated Return of the King by the same people who made the animated Hobbit. I haven’t seen it though so idk how good it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

Christopher Tolkien agrees.

But in all seriousness, while I do think the films are alright, they are nothing compared to the books. People should definitely read them before watching the adaptation, it really is an experience.

permalink
report
reply
49 points
*

I think the movies are the best adaptation we could have gotten. The books a hard read and most of it wouldn’t translate well to film. All the songs, the long winded dialogs, descriptive parts, the ending, etc. I can understand Christopher Tolkien though, especially since he grew up and old with these stories, and probably nothing would ever do it justice compared to what he imagined his whole life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Having read the books long ago, and recently listened to them narrated by Andy serkis, holy shit the books do NOT translate into movie form.

Maybe a miniseries like Battlestar Galactica, but the budget for it would have to be insane.

People don’t seem to understand that nobody is going to fimund their dream movie adaptation, because their dream movie adaptation has a larger budget than most countries’ GDP.

I would LOVE to have seen Tom Bombadil and the barrow wights. I’d love to have gotten to see everything in the book, but let’s be realistic here.

Go back in time with a few metric tons of gold, fund it however you see fit. I think if given proper funding, and more strict guidelines to keep the funding, he’d make as perfect an adaptation live-action could get in a miniseries. Make it like 90-100 minutes per “episode” and stretch it out however long it takes.

Do people not realize he was told initially it would have to be shown in ONE movie? And he fought to have at LEAST two, and that the studio we finally got insisted on 3 because this story is too long and complex (and lucrative) to be only two movies?

It could have been much, much worse. But hot damn do I wish it were better, even recognizing how good it was.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

I read the books as a child and young adult multiple times before the films came out. The films are fantastic and a solid adaptation for a different medium, they got the feeling down even if some parts were left out as part of the change to the other medium.

The Hobbit movies are hot garbage though, and I blame studio meddling for those.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

On the Hobbit movies, I don’t even think studio meddling was the biggest issue.

Peter Jackson had so much time to prepare for the original trilogy, where as he took over the Hobbit movies quite soon before they were scheduled to shoot and he couldn’t use the preparation the previous director had done.

So he had no time to prepare and basically had to wing it with 3 movies and little to no prep.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I liked the hobbit movies, but I’m not going to argue that they were good. I even reread the book in preparation. The movie hit all of the points I was curious to see illustrated visually. I thought the new characters ramped up the tension nicely, and the barrel scene was genuinely joyous. I was also glad the singing was such a big part of the theming, including the wonderful opening, where Bilbo is beset by the Dwarfs and has to host them against his will.

Anyway, I’m not saying I’m right, or that my view is objective, but I enjoyed all of Peter Jackson’s Tolkien movies more than I thought I ever would. Clear evidence that we don’t live in the darkest timeline, at least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That lack of time is a direct result of studio meddling. The studios pushed Guillermo del Toro out, threatened Peter Jackson with removing the production from New Zealand to force him into coming on as director, and tried to force him to keep to a similar timetable as the GDT production.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Can’t argue with this at all, but the books aren’t for everyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You’re correct, of course… But the people you’re referring to can be taught to read.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Lord of the memes

!lotrmemes@midwest.social

Create post

The Lord of the rings memes communitiy on Lemmy. Share memes about Lord of the rings and be respectful.

Community stats

  • 3.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 684

    Posts

  • 6.5K

    Comments