94 points

I went through a Second Life land trading phase quite a few years back. Properties like this were very valuable to advertisers. Because of advertisers, it was possible to be a niche real estate mogul for weird useless little virtual properties like this that could earn you an actual meaningful real-world income. Second Life had (may still have, I’ve not been back in a while) its own advertising industry and multiple adtech networks. A despicable inevitability of having completely free content creation tools and also an economy that can trade with real money. People trying to sell their creations want people to pay in game currency to get their things, so they can extract the value to real money. They want people to know about their products, so they turn to people who will accept in game currency to blast awareness of their products everywhere. Those advertisers want land, which they need to buy. Probably from another player.

So, the first thing I thought of when I saw this plot was “BILLBOARDS!!!” and I hate it.

permalink
report
reply
91 points

I am a very large snake and this is my dream home.

Seriously though, that isn’t just someone’s easement? How did it even end up as a separate lot?

permalink
report
reply
13 points

In all honesty there are probably some perfectly reasonable official records that somehow got parsed incorrectly to give us this abomination.

My bet is that a developer bought up a huge chunk of land, and built these subdivisions on it. The roads, houses, and strip were all originally part of that property. That tiny strip is an easement owned by the HOA. It is not, nor will ever be, for sale. However Zillow didn’t know what to make of it, so just listed it as a land property and then applied its normal value calculations to the strip.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s listed by a realtor and the asking price is $25K. I don’t think it’s Zillow not knowing what to do, which makes this more interesting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

If you really hate someone who lives in one of those six houses, this lot affords you many opportunities for mischief.

I can’t imagine any other reason for this to exist.

permalink
report
reply
39 points

It looks wide enough for a billboard to me

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

LED billboard

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Build a twitter seizure board lmao

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Everything is wide enough for a billboard of you’re brave enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Most places near me require you to give access to your neighbor to their own property, so if you had a lot like this you would still need to let them have access to their back yard via your chaos strip.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

My understanding is that this only applies if there’s no other way for the neighbor to access their own property. If the property owners can access their property from any other way (for example, from the city streets), there’s no obligation for a landowner who owns the back of the property to allow them to have a second access point.

Does my backyard neighbor owe me the right to cut across his back yard to access mine? No. I have a driveway that connects to a city street.

On the chaos angle, I’d imagine that some of those homes have built backyard gates that allow them direct private access to that park. If someone were to buy up that strip they could cut that off and basically extort each homeowner for access. It’s possible that the homeowners could claim some sort of “I’ve used this land for 20 years for access to the park argument,” but that would involve individual claims, expense, and a general PITA legal mess. And depending on the locality, it may require you to prove that you’ve done improvements to the property and a whole host of other PITA things.

Best case for those homeowners is to pay a couple of thousand each to buy the lot and come to an agreement among themselves on subdivision and/or collective maintenance and access rights.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s exactly what I would do - Get the neighbors to chip in and buy the lot to parcel up and add to our yards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

The perfect property for the zip line/archery enthusiast

permalink
report
reply
9 points

I prefer zipline riflery

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Zipline artillery

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Ah yes, the American Biathlon

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

How about fencing? (That’s a terrible joke, I’m sorry).

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Looks like someone is already built over their lot line into this space on Zillow. Good luck with the extra court battle! https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/601-Jericho-Ave-NE-Renton-WA-98059/2064096887_zpid

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

Is this butterfly adverse possession?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Terrible Estate Agent Photos

!badrealestate@feddit.uk

Create post

Terrible photos listed by estate agents/realtors that are so bad they’re funny.

Posting guidelines.

Posts in this community must be of property (inside or out) listed for sale which contains a terrible element. “Terrible” can refer to:

  • the photo itself (finger over the lens, too far away, people in the shot, bad Photoshop, etc.)

  • the property (weird layout, questionable plumbing, unsound structure, etc.)

  • the interior (carpeted bathrooms, awful taste interiors, weird mannequins/taxidermies/art, inflatable pools indoors, etc.)

  • the actual listing itself including unusual descriptions and unrealistic pricing. However, this isn’t a community to discuss the housing market in general. This is a comedic community - let’s keep it light.

  • Photos can be sourced from anywhere and be any age, but please check they haven’t already been posted.

  • Censor any names/contact details of private individuals.

  • Mark the post NSFW if it includes nudity or sensitive content

Rules.

This community follows the rules of the feddit.uk instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  • Be civil, remember the human.
  • No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name-calling.
  • Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  • Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum.
  • Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  • Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

Community stats

  • 856

    Monthly active users

  • 164

    Posts

  • 4.8K

    Comments