17 points

MKBHD did a test drive and apparently you just cannot see the end of the nose from the driver’s seat. What a terrible design with no thought to the safety of anyone.

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*

What a terrible design with no thought […]

So, like every Tesla vehicle?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I have had a Model 3 for about 4 years now and I think it has generally been a very well-made car.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think they go in waves. They will have a couple good production cycles, then anytime they have to increase production the shit starts popping up

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Isn’t that the case with most modern cars due to the downward sloping hoods?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Maybe I phrased that wrong. You can’t see where the hood ends, so there is no sense of how much is in front of you. Most vehicles you can see where it drops off

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Look, I applaud them for trying to be unique, but man that has to be the ugliest vehicle I’ve ever seen. As for concerns about it’s safety, I’d be concerned too considering how little space there appears to be between the driver and the front of the vehicle. Also, the last thing you want on a 30mph road is an acceleration pedal that immediately tries to show off how fast it can hit 60mph.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

There are no crumple zones. Like, I didn’t realize that was even legal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Of course there are crumple zones. I have no idea why people are parroting this nonsense. Here’s a video that explains it:

https://youtu.be/9ll2_BDZpI4

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Did you watch that video? There’s no crumple zone! The front end bounces back off that wall almost immediately! When the host was saying he doesn’t see a difference, there was a pretty big difference in how the cybertruck bounced backwards but the truck settled down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So that doesn’t really debunk the statement. Like the other comment says, the Cybertruck bounces a lot more than the F150. Tesla says the underside of the front end is designed to break apart, but from what I can see online the actual safety is still up in the air.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

how little space there appears to be between the driver and the front of the vehicle

As someone who used to drive a 63 W Bus, you get used to it. I used to use the headlight housing as a footrest on road trips.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

“Unlike Europe, the U.S. doesn’t require cars be tested for safety before they are allowed to be sold to the public,” said David Zipper, a visiting fellow at Harvard University’s Kennedy School whose work focuses on transportation policy.

“We let car companies decide for themselves when it’s safe,” he explained.

I’m sorry, what???

permalink
report
reply
7 points

self-regulation of industry like this is a lot more common than you’d probably like to think

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It is yes but it shouldn’t be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

MCAS all over again…

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s a three ton steel knife that does zero to sixty in three seconds, it’s literally designed to shred human bodies.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

“Liked the president’s football tweet more than mine did you? Die.” -Elon Musk

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Clearly this is cause for more, bigger vehicles to protect the peds

permalink
report
reply

City Life

!citylife@beehaw.org

Create post

All topics urbanism and city related, from urban planning to public transit to municipal interest stuff. Both automobile and FuckCars inclusive.


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 70

    Monthly active users

  • 228

    Posts

  • 731

    Comments