177 points

For me the most impactful sentence here is the acknowledgement that the war on drugs failed. This is obvious to a lot of us, but to politicians to say this, could mean they are actually not tangled up with the drug lords. Cheers for Switzerland, hope the legal marijuana trials triumph with positive outcomes.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

The war on drugs was widely successful when you start considering that it was never meant to combat drugs. It was a political maneuver to divide the populace.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Exactly, it’s not the war on drugs, it’s the war on blacks and the poor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I thought the War on Drugs was a distinctly American thing, ya know, starting a war that’s doomed to fail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Nope, here in Brazil they love to copycat the US where it fails the most, like education, healthcare, prison system and war on drugs. Sadly the whole south america follows this path at some degree.

permalink
report
parent
reply
141 points

The “War on drugs” has been a colossal failure.

Legalize, regulate and tax.

At least then you can take the money out of the cartels and despotic regimes. You can then use the tax money raised to offset the harm these drugs absolutely do through social policies and rehabilitation programs that actually work

permalink
report
reply
72 points

Also helps ensure the drugs are clean. The US marijuana legalization process has absolutely not been perfect but the regime of testing for pesticides and mold is very effective.

If cocaine were legal and regulated you wouldn’t be hearing all these stories of people dying of fentanyl overdoses from doing shitty cut coke.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

It does make me wonder where they swiss government will acquire their coke. With weed, it’s fairly easy to grow it wherever you need to, but with coke, you pretty much have to be in certain regions, yeah?

If that’s the case, is this still going to be supporting those same cartels? If more countries legalized, we could maybe hope to see legally grown, harvested, and processed coke without all the slave labor and shit. Could be a real boon for South American countries, too, if the cartels lost power, and the cocoa plantations could be nationalized.

I just woke up, so I may be just talking out my ass, though

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Coca, not cocoa…

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

I’m honestly totally ignorant to whether they can be grown indoors at scale outside of their normal growing region, but that’s a good point to bring up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

If you go to Peru, you can buy coca leaf tea, grown by legitimate companies, sold entirely legally. It’s amazing for adjusting to high altitudes, if you ever go to the Andes, I highly recommend you drink the tea.

There’s huge illegal growing operations, but there’s legal ones. It’s not that hard to grow - I think it likes high altitudes and moisture, but although it’s not as easy to grow as “weed”, I’m pretty sure it’s easier than coffee

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Ethically sourced sustainable cocaine

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The coca tree is a high altitude tropical plant that isn’t very cold tolerant. Having a look at the plant hardiness zones in Europe, parts of southern Italy, Greece, coastal Portugal or Spain might be suitable for cultivation. It’s been a while since I looked into it but people have been attempting to breed cultivars that are tolerant of low altitude conditions as well. With public research and funding it would likely be possible to produce cultivars that are more suitable for coastal Europe. That’s if it’s even the best way to go.

I’m for total legalization of recreational drugs and I think it’d be a pretty shitty thing to just tell south amarica “fuck you, we’ll make our own” considering the catastrophe caused by the war on drugs in those countries

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Living in Vancouver, I’ve learned that a LOT of people purposely use fentanyl as it augments their high, the problem is its INCREDIBLY powerful, so if you fuck up the amount you take by even a tiny amount, it can lead to an overdose. So I’m not sure if legalization will solve the fentanyl overdose side of the problem

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

The “War on drugs” has been a colossal failure.

That’s only true if you believe the lies that the “war on drugs” was actually about drugs. It never has been, it was always about having an excuse to incarcerate and beat down groups they didn’t like; minorities, the poor, and the left.

When you look at it that way, it’s obvious that the war on drugs is actually a really successful means to an end. Just try not to have a heart and think of the countless lives they ruined to keep a boot on peoples’ neck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

For waging a war on drugs, the US government certainly imported a lot of cocaine into the US.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The war on drugs has been a massive success.

It keeps people poor, desperate, and ashamed to engage in behavior rich people engage in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

that’s the war on poverty.

we are talking about the war on drugs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s the same thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No, we keep it illegal and go the Ollie North strategy. Invent a more addictive form of cocaine (crack), and sell it to minorities to fund secret wars for oil in South America.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The soft legalization of medical marijuana in Thailand would affect Singapore’s stance on marijuana.

permalink
report
parent
reply
111 points

People. Cocaine is not maryjanes. You can get addicted badly to cocaine. There’s tons of neurological effects that will cause you to not function proplerly in society. By all means smoke your ganja but don’t equate hard drugs with it.

permalink
report
reply
67 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

People also confuse legalisation with general availability. The two are not synonymous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

I have a completely different problem with cocaine. Namely that it is extremely exploitive to the people who grow the coca. It takes about two acres of coca plants to produce just one kilo of cocaine. Obviously, that means the people who farm it are paid virtually nothing and live on starvation wages. If it’s really cheap in Switzerland, that makes it worse.

On top of that, coca plantations are responsible for huge amounts of deforestation in an area of the world that should not be deforested.

However- hundreds of thousands of people are working in coca plantations and own small coca farms and if this all ended, they wouldn’t even have the meagre wages they make from coca farming. So I don’t know what the solution here is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

wouldn’t legalizing it also solve that issue? It could be grown legally - much like legal marijuana.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Lots of highly addicting stuff is legal, I don’t care if people do cocaine. Make it legal and safely accessible so drug addicts can participate in society and not have to fund cartels

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Many mistakes are available at highly competitive prices.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The same things can be said about maryjanes as well. And about alcohol. With cocaine it is just even more likely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah it’s always the same thing. “Guys, you can smoke cigarettes, but weed will fry your brains and leave you completely useless to society. Legalizing would be a disaster”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Idk, it seems like a pretty big jump in addiction potential. I don’t hear of too many people going into sex work to support their alcohol and cannabis habits.

I do support at least decriminalization of all drugs though. As long as it coincides with adequate education, harm reduction, and therapy resources.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not even close

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Yes, light and legal drugs are not okay as well. They too may cause severe health (including mental health) issues, as well as addiction.

THC, alcohol, nicotine and even caffeine cause significant and measurable harm, and you’ll be much better off by restricting them long-term, unless you have medical indications to consume them.

If you need any of them to relax or to have a good party or to stay productive, remember it is NOT sustainable and actively harmful and something has to be done about the way you organize your life. You can’t go on like this forever, it will get you eventually

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

What consenting adults do with their body is their own business.

Bodily autonomy is an all or nothing thing. Whether you’re talking about abortion, gender affirming surgery, taking a dick in the ass and in the mouth at the same time, or shooting meth into your dick. It’s all the same thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

I don’t necessarily disagree, but this brings up the next round of tough questions:

If your bodily autonomy is absolute, fine, but what happens when your choices and their impact start to spill beyond your own personal life?

If you want to go wild with hard drugs, okay fine, whatever. But when you need medical attention because of that decision, should insurance providers or the state be obligated to spend in order to treat you?

When your addiction costs you your job and support network, should the collective taxpayer have to subsidize your poor life choices?

I don’t mind the notion that individuals should have final say over what happens to their bodies, but that sort of assumption of responsibility, at some point, cuts both ways…and the flip side of some of these decisions would suggest that the individual should bear all consequences of their decisions…which seems unlikely in practice. We’re not going to see an addict rushed to an ER and the hospital toss them out into the street saying, “This was your decision! Sorry!”

And the mitigation measures seem equally unlikely to fly with the “strict bodily autonomy” crowd: increased insurance premiums or exception clauses in policies in order to keep expenses reined in for the rest of the policy holders/taxpayers who aren’t using their strict autonomy in a way that adversely affects others.

While it’s fine to conceptually discuss these decisions in a vacuum where it only affects the individual, in real life application, these decisions have impacts outside the individual in almost every case, which fundamentally shift the discussion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I struggle with this line of thinking because there are so many legal things people can do to increase their probability of being a burden in the national healthcare system. Alcohol, junk food, working too much, gambling too maybe. I can’t wrap my head around a system that would be “fair” and not fall into a black mirror episode dystopian “good citizen” points system. I’d rather just pay more than my fair share, knowingly subsidise people who make bad choices, and not live in the dystopian society.

Theres a separate argument about the drugs increasing crime probability that I also don’t buy entirely. Those crimes are crimes already, so making these other “precrimes” also crimes seems a bit weird - not to mention wildly ineffective at reducing harm or use of the substances in question. I’m sure we can identify books and films that increase future criminal probability too.

Bodily autonomy does hold some water for me as an argument, but for me it’s more about finding a way to minimise societal harm while maximally hurting the businesses profiting from these dark economies we have created through prohibition. But this brings up another round of tough questions: do we do this for all substances? Forever? Is this really the path of least societal harm? (I honestly don’t know)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Then you charge people with the crimes they’ve committed. You hold people accountable for the choices they’ve made. It’s quite simple, in my opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The question is whether or not a legal-in-some-circumstances is more effective at reducing social damage than keeping it illegal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Nobody is saying that people should start taking cocaine. Just that you shouldn’t get your life ruined by having it / using it.

Also, knowing that what your getting isn’t mixed with mdma, amphetamines, ketamine and being able to properly monitor your dosage instead of guesstimating the purity and doing brain arithmetic is very helpful.

There’s a major difference in having the person who sells it to you wanting you to quit vs wanting you to consume more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Ironically, cocaine would be safer if it were cut with those 3 drugs

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Those are bad examples of contaminants as they all are safer than cocaine. Cocaine is one of the most dangerous hard drugs with only things like heroin and fentanyl being more dangerous. I am not saying it should be illegal mind you. It’s just interesting to think about. If you were going to start getting hard drugs legalized it’s maybe not the best place to start despite it’s relative popularity. I would maybe start with MDMA or Ketamine as they are generally safer and have actual medical uses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

There are plenty of “hard drugs” you can do with very little damage to your body. Cocaine is not one of them. In fact, it’s one of the worst things you can do for your heart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You can get addicted to and fuck up your life with bud too my friend. It’s harder but it’s possible. Source, me.

Also, as the others said. Coke being illegal does nothing to stop its prevalence so what’s the point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
101 points

People should note that cocaine is the widest illegal drug used in Switzerland. Cannabis is second.

permalink
report
reply
45 points
*

Man, I just don’t get how that many people would like coke. It’s a shitty high, that doesn’t last nearly long enough, that has massive implications for your long term health, and it costs way too much for what you get. $50 of weed = enough for a week+. $50 of coke = maybe 30m if you’re not sharing. I’m glad I never really got it, it’s too much of a rich persons drug for me to have ever been able to service an addiction to it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

idk man some of the stuff I’ve had kept me going all night off of just a couple lines.

Quality varies wildly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Always found coke highs were like an hour or two max, maybe mine wasn’t best but all night? Mean it wasn’t nothing after an hour but it was at the stage where coke’s name should be ‘more?’. If it did that to me in my party days I’d have said it was cut with some speedy stuff. That said I had a decent tolerance to most things at that point so my experience may not be usual either but it may not just be quality level is all I’m saying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Tolerance is wild. I’ve had a ball in the past and that’s like two weeks for two people. .2 is solid for a full night if being geeked.

I asked the fella I got it from, later: “yer regular peeps, do you mind telling me how much they’ll do in a night, average?”

He asked “on a weekend?” Yeah.

“They’ll buy a ball on Friday, then back for another on Sunday.”

Addiction is a bitch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That wasn’t coke, that sounds honestly a lot more like meth to me bud

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Your cocaine was cut with amphetamines.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Worth noting that a gram of coke currently goes for a nationwide average of around 100-150 USD in Switzerland, and about 200-250 in the US, per the data I looked up.

Different supply levels of and ease of access to various drugs make them comparatively more or less expensive. Combine that will a user base of above-average wealth and it makes sense.

I agree regarding the absolute value of the two drugs though. Coke is fine, I suppose, but nothing I want to shell out the money for - but then again, I’m not in Switzerland so who knows.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Holy fuck prices have gone up since I got sober. The current Swiss price is higher than the street price where i am in the US in 2012 when I last did the stuff.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not too sure, Germany should still be around 50€ / gram with Suisse for sure not 3x the price

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Aside from the price, in my opinion it’s far superior to weed. It’s a shorter high, but much better IMO. The price is the main reason I don’t use it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’ve heard it’s cheaper if you mix with baking soda or something and smoke it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Maybe be thankful that you didn’t get it. I wish I didn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Some folks like coke especially because the high doesn’t last all night. If you aren’t strapped, you can up and down your night at will based on whatever else is happening.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

I honestly don’t get how that many people would like drugs in general.

Like, if you need drugs to have a good time, you probably have mental health issues and you better solve those first.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You sound like fun, do you get invited to parties much?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What exactly does substance use have to do with mental health?

Nobody uses drugs as a way of having a good time, they are used to enhance a good time. If you aren’t having a good time sober, you aren’t gonna have a good time peaked either unless you took a LOT.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Is it weird that this somehow makes sense with all the banking?

Why is it that the finance industry and cocaine seem to go together so often?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

High stress

Need a lot of productivity

Cocaine is good for both of those

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They should try meth then, far more efficient than coke at both.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Holy shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Well there’s your problem, it’s a lot easier to measure out if you do it by weight instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points

The best way to reduce harm with this drug to users and the planet is to get rid of the deadly impurities and high cost.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Removing impurities is really tricky, but that said, it’s not like industry grade equipment and operations are being used here to manufacture it. There may be a simple step or two that would help significantly reduce impurities.

Your comment also made me realize for the first time, a lot of these illicit drugs are made by hobbyists, so to speak, not professional manufacturers. Just knowledge isn’t enough, and I say that as a chemical engineer. If I tried to synthesize anything at home it would have a high degree of impurity – even if I bought some nice lab equipment.

There’s probably a lot of benefit in having the government subsidize a pharma company to make high purity drugs. The impurities could be responsible for a lot of side effects.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I bet many go out of their way to avoid getting proper equipment because those purchases can get them on a list. It’s legally safer to produce sketchy shit, and since you’re breaking the law anyways, who cares if what you’re selling is really what you say it is.

Profit comes from volume, you can take the risk of selling to as many people as possible or you can inflate your volume with other cheaper shit and never even consider the bit of powder that remained in a lethal dose-sized clump as you mixed it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah and lazy dealers, Jesus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Maybe you wanted this word: sleezy

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Might also add: greedy

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Source? Cutting cocaine almost always makes it safer, not more dangerous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Tell that to my two infrequent user friends who decided to share some cocaine at home, after going out the bar, catching up after not seeing each other for a while who both died from fentanyl overdose.

Inert cutting agents that simply dilute the product are not type of impurities in the sense that I was talking about. And I think there’s clear.

Also. when inert cutting agents are used without the user knowing the potency they are more liable to overdose. Legal and regulated cocaine would not have fentanyl or levamisole etc, and the potency would be printed on the bottle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

That’s like saying that the best way to reduce harm from alcohol is to make good strong alcohol cheap so people wouldn’t drink eau-de-cologne and denaturate.

Problems with alcohol are not limited to it sometimes being mixed with poison.

Problems with cocaine didn’t start with it becoming illegal.

Let’s please not talk as if it’s normal to consume it.

EDIT: That said, I do sometimes consume alcohol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Let’s put it this way:

I have a few relatives believing in folk medicine,

a few other relatives believing in good holy USSR unfairly taken from us by evil fate,

a friend believing in esoterics,

a friend and a relative with alcoholism problems,

an acquaintance doing prostitution,

and some acquaintances believing in Russian neo-paganism (very far from actual Russian paganism) with all the history freakery attached,

and probably I’d know some blowing coke if it weren’t a thing best kept secret here due to inhumane laws.

That doesn’t mean any of those things are normal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Problems with alcohol are not limited to it sometimes being mixed with poison.

Alcohol IS a poison…

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yes, I meant dedicated poison.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Let’s please not talk as if it’s normal to consume it.

Cocaine is the second most popular illicit substance. It’s very normal to consume it whether that’s a good thing or not. This conversation doesn’t have room for people who deny reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 284K

    Comments