Cannon also ordered the unsealing of documents Smith’s team had filed in the case earlier this month in order to make them public. Prosecutors argued to have the materials remained sealed because they could reveal Smith’s court strategy.

Former DOJ prosecutor Andrew Weissmann previously said that he believes Smith should take action against Cannon and potentially seek to have the judge removed from Trump’s case. Weissmann’s comments followed Cannon’s denial of Smith’s request to have the judge set a deadline for Trump’s Classified Information Procedures Act.

47 points

Possibly the biggest disappointment of this whole situation is that it has nothing to do with an Alien Cannon no matter how often I misread the name “Aileen”.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Please they going keep letting Trump get out of consequences until the next election. Lets hope he loses so maybe then they will have no choice but to lock him up then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

What does that have to do with alien cannons?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

If we can get one built before the election, we can fire Trump out of it and into the sun.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

T’would explain a few things, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Is it i-leen, ai-leen or ale-eeen

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I lean

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

…to the Right, right?

I’ll see myself out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I believe that spelling is generally pronounced ai-leen. Every i-leen I’ve ever met spelled it Eileen. Ale-eeen isn’t something I’ve heard before.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
1 point

Trump? I think he’s more of an adderall kind of guy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

She should be removed from case and impeached.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Special Counsel Jack Smith on Tuesday pressed U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to grant his request for a speedy trial in former President Donald Trump’s classified documents case for the ninth time.

But the former president’s legal team has requested a delay in the proceedings, claiming that the current schedule does not provide sufficient time for the defense to prepare, given the high volume of evidence against Trump in the Florida case.

Smith noted in his filing that the court has already ordered that the current trial timeline applies to Trump’s co-defendants in the case, Walt Nauta and Carlos de Oliveira.

According to the document, Trump, Nauta and de Oliveira reviewed Smith’s filing before it was presented to Cannon and “authorized the Government to represent that they concur with it.”

Former DOJ prosecutor Andrew Weissmann previously said that he believes Smith should take action against Cannon and potentially seek to have the judge removed from Trump’s case.

Weissmann’s comments followed Cannon’s denial of Smith’s request to have the judge set a deadline for Trump’s Classified Information Procedures Act.


The original article contains 499 words, the summary contains 178 words. Saved 64%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I can do a shorter summary: Justice is dead. Saved 99.4%.

permalink
report
parent
reply
96 points

Aileen Cannon is a disgrace, and her continued presence on the bench–not just overseeing this case–is fatally damaging the legitimacy of the federal judiciary.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

fatally damaging the legitimacy of the federal judiciary.

Not a very high bar, a soft breeze is also fatally damaging to the legitimacy of the federal judiciary

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

She’s neck and neck with John Roberts and Clarence Thomas in that regard.

It remains to be seen who will be most slavishly protective of Trump; she absolutely has the early lead but SCOTUS is set up for a hell of an innings.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 473K

    Comments