403 points

Great for the fediverse but also weird reason to jump ship. All the other bullshit was fine, but “whoa they changed the logo now I’m out”?

permalink
report
reply
392 points

A lot of people stay because of lingering attachment to the platform. As weird as it is, changing the branding subconsciously tells the human brain “This is a new platform” and that makes switching mentally easier.

permalink
report
parent
reply
221 points

You’ve been considering leaving Twitter for a while, and suddenly one morning the bird has flown and Twitter has left you instead.

I think it’s also a clear signal that things are really never going to return to normal, it’s only getting worse from here. Which is easy those of us on the outside to observe, but maybe slightly harder from the inside when you still have most of the community still intact and posting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points
*

I think some of us also had hopes that the new CEO would put a leash on Musk and steer Twitter into calmer waters again, but this was just proof that Musk is still doing wtf he wants and the CEO is just there for show. So people have now abandoned their last bit of hope and therefore abandoned T…I mean X as well.

While I haven’t been an active user in a longer time, I’ve still been a very active lurker until Musk took over. By now, I’ve only checked Twitter every now and then when bored, to see what happened (as I mostly used Twitter as some kind of news feeds for stuff I couldn’t easily follow in any other way). But today I started migrating off completely - going through my follow list one by one and finding ways to follow those things (like local police, local town, local zoo, etc.) in other ways.

For some that means slower news, or only the most important news - which kinda sucks, as e.g. local police info were good to have in real time during major events or when there was some protest going on. For some this even means mailing lists, ugh.

And a few I couldn’t replace at all, so I’ll miss out on those news. Sucks, but hopefully those people/entities will provide their news feed through some better means sometime now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

I think it’s spot on. It’s people who were already going through the stages of grief, were kinda stuck in “bargaining” (like: “nah, Twitter is not really dead, it’ll come back”), and the symbolism there about Twitter really being gone-gone fast-tracked them to depression/acceptance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

The stages of grief don’t have to go in that order. People can be angry at Twitter and then jump to acceptance that its never going back. No fast tracking needed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
  • Denial: “There is no way Elon would do that to Twitter.”
  • Anger: “This is stupid. Why would Elon do this to Twitter? He’s making things so much worse!”
  • Bargaining: “Maybe if I hold out he’ll revert the changes. Maybe Elon has some good left in his heart.”
  • Depression: “Why do stupid things like this happen to me?”
  • Acceptance: “Looks like Twitter’s dead in the water, we should move on.”
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They finally started to read the room and noticed the furniture they liked wasn’t there and had been stolen. We’ve already figured out Musk’s antics and that he’s a deplorable human being. They’re finally starting to open their eyes and pay attention, especially now that he’s meddled with their toy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

When spez doubled down and Reddit imploded i moved to lemmy. I also discovered mastodon. But then i realized the reason i used twitter was to follow certain people/accounts none of which are on mastodon.

We had a reason to ditch Reddit, because they forced everyone off our beloved third party apps. But twitter didn’t have this kind of meltdown. Im only a consumer on Twitter, and its still working fine. No reason to quit. The rate limit is dumb but it isn’t the end of the world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Yup Twitter was for following people and Reddit was for following topics. Lemmy with all the new users is pretty much viable for big topics now but Mastodon doesn’t magically have all the people I want to follow just because it’s a better format.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

some dignity might be enough reason to leave it

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Couldn’t agree more. I was a fail whale era twitter user. Wayyyyy early user. I ditched it a little bit before musk actually, but I still ended up seeing threads here and there because of Reddit.

Just today I landed on a Twitter thread, saw that x and it was like, strangely repulsing…I wanted to get the hell out of there asap

permalink
report
parent
reply
85 points

Elon rate limits tweets

i sleep

Elon changes the logo

real shit??

permalink
report
parent
reply

I’ve already had several non-tech people say something along the lines of “What the heck is this X thing on my phone?”

I gotta wonder how many other people are just impulse uninstalling something they don’t recognize off their phone as well, since ol’ Musky boi did this with basically zero user notice as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

I had a similar thought. Non-techies are going to open up Twitter and see a different logo but it the text still says Twitter and think they’re on a phishing site.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Bass pro shops social media > Twitter/X

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

The blue bird was the last thing they had left

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I think a good amount of it is also “the straw that broke the camel’s back.” Twitter users have been taking abuse after abuse. Like many others have stated, they use Twitter to follow specific people. If those people aren’t on other platforms, then they’re going to stay. But after a certain point, the cost becomes too high. Now the platform is rebranded and now it looks as alien as it’s begun to feel. I think that’s why so many are once again leaving. Before they could just ignore everything else going on and try to move on with their day. Not there’s a big, fat X reminding them of how much they’re starting to/already hate the platform now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Renaming Twitter to 𝕏 is probably the straw that break the camel’s back to those people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I’d like to think it’s people finally realizing “Holy shit he IS an idiot” but that might be too optimistic

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Because tweeting and being on Twitter is culturally relevant. Twxing and being on =…,/‘’‘’°°X°°“”/,…= is sad and cringe.

People run away from things which are sad and cringe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

People run away from things which are sad and cringe.

Threads would like to have a word

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I kinda like the name “Threads” but X sounds like something 12 year old me came up with

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

No one goes around saying they’re on twitter and that they tweet. People aren’t going to leave in any great numbers because it’s now called X.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The logo change has brought out a new wave of articles and tweets about it, and people go “oh no that’s right I’m on twitter! Well THIS is the final straw! Thank goodness there were all these hate articles and tweets that reminded me I was supposed to be angry!”

Also, many of the people who “jump ship” are right back on Twitter within a week. mastodon.social has an entire graveyard of celebrity accounts that haven’t been posted to in months because the outraged celebrities just went back to twitter.

I’m happy for Mastodon (I run a fediverse instance and the more users there are the more chances of interesting people and the like), and some of those people do realize they like the vibe more and stay, and a lot of those bumps are significant for the platform. The thing is, we’re talking a few hundred thousand, maybe a million accounts of 200 million daily active users on twitter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Remember why Ray Kroc wanted McDonald’s… because of the name/brand. Anybody could make a hamburger/shake shop or shack but he had to have the name because the name was a seller.

Nobody thinks X is cool other than Elon musk and him switching to it is another signifier of how uncool Twitter has become. Every little thing adds to the flow of traffic to the exit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s like watching an episode of Beavis and Butt-Head where every single decision they make is a bad decision. And it’s hilarious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

people do weird things

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

None of it was fine, people have been browsing for alternatives ever since Elon Musk took over.

At most, many hoped things would ultimately stay the same, which they definitely didn’t. The biggest hurdle is that a lot of people there are waiting for their friends and favorite content creators to pick what place they will move to, and content creators are extra hesitant because they don’t know if they will have as much following and reach as they used to. I see a bunch of smaller creators pretty much mourning their careers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This will be one of the first “in your face” things that is immediately noticable by a finicky user base that only understands and associates value to popular brands. Musk just removed the popular and familiar brand that people are comfortable with, so why would those people stay?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Made a mastodon account yesterday mainly out of curiosity. Never been to Twitter.

So they might be counting just me lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

People really love their cute animal logos I guess, #whatcanyoudo?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And probably won’t matter much.

This user surge will probably go crawling right back in a week or two.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Every surge will retain more people as every surge brings more content.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s true. I just don’t expect this one to be quite so consequential as the others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yeah, if moving to Threads wasn’t enough to hold people there, I doubt Mastodon will be able to hold them either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Also how do they know it is a twitter exodus and not a Reddit or Threads exodus? I quit reddit entirely and I know many who have as well. It seems much more likely to be the case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I get your point, but Twitter is more analogous to Mastadon than to Lemmy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Definitely I understand your first comment but I don’t understand the second. I don’t think it looks like a swastika but more of an energy drink.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points
*

@PeleSpirit

Let me help you visualize that

@BlackRose @const_void @BitingChaos

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

Yeah it makes no sense. I think the media is just out to trash Elon at every opportunity for any miniscule thing. He is somewhat of an outcast of the billionaires club in that he dies not appear to want to enslave humanity and deny the poors of their rights.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Yea he just settles for treating his employees with no respect and firing them on a whim without their owed severance pay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Cite examples?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Yeah, I mean, who hasn’t wanted to experiment with putting microchips into baboon skulls, or called someone a pedophile just because they hurt your feelings, or treats their workers like absolute trash? He’s just a regular guy doing regular things and the media is using him as their whipping boy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Transhumanism is a thing whether we like it or not, hopefully Elon will do it ethically. I don’t care if he said mean things to somone, that is between him and the individual. Provide examples of him treating his employees like trash?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

What are you on about? Every opportunity to trash him??? He can easily change his behaviour, he’s a trash person so he doesn’t. He absolutely wants to deny the poor their rights, look at how he treats the workers of twitter and how he spoke of those he fired. I truly don’t know how you can be this blind unless it’s willful. Get real

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Twitter shrunk its staff by 3700, many of whom left of their own volition. Examples of some companies that cut more jobs then Twitter that nobody seemed to givr a damn about: Amazon 27k Meta 21k Accenture 19k Alphabet 12k Microsoft 10k Salesforce 8k Disney 7k Dell 6.6k

I guess the people working at those companies just don’t matter huh?

I don’t see any other billionaires fighting for basic human rights like free speech other than Elon. He doesn’t have a perfect track record on that count but it is better than the flat 0 of the rest of that clique.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Wait, what? Have you ever heard of longtermism? “Your stupid peasants’ suffering today matters little if we can take humanity to spaceTM. Don’t hold back progress.” If this is not enslaving humanity and shitting on the poor, I don’t know what is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

What are you even talking about? Care to elavorate? How is he making anyone suffer?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He doesn’t need to enslave humanity, just his Mars colony. As far as money over rights are concerned, his ‘free speech absolutist digital town square’ sure does give a lot more privileges for those willing to pay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Musk has openly stated his support for the Republicans and for right wing causes countless times during his twitter shitposting period. If anything he has more openly voiced support of enslavement of humanity and the denial of the rights of poors than most of his billionaire colleagues, who are mostly all too smart to voice those ideas anywhere in public.

permalink
report
parent
reply
189 points

Mastodon has become super stable. It is the place to go.

permalink
report
reply
51 points
*

Absolutely - though some people find it too bare bones. It’s designed to be a bit of an anti-Twitter, after all.

Those looking for something more flashy might be interested in checking out, for example, Firefish. The Firefish site also includes a neat “Fediverse software comparison”, which lists popular federated services and some of the features they currently have. Personally I prefer the stripped down approach of Mastodon, but reasonable people might disagree. :)

Oh, and there’s also elk.zone, an online user interface for Mastodon that behaves a lot like Twitter. Similar to those “old lemmy” sites (like old.lemmy.world) in a way, but as an online app similar to wefwef.app.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Is Firefish the same thing as Calckey?

I created a Calckey account a couple of weeks ago but it was basically a weird Mastodon with even fewer people from what I could tell.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Yes, Calckey updated and rebranded (?) as FireFish. https://joinfediverse.wiki/What_is_Firefish%3F

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Important to note, the fewer people should not significantly restrict your experience. Everything is part of the same network.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yes, it’s just a rebrand. It’s similar to Mastodon in some ways but with many many more features.

It’s federated so you can follow and interact with all the same Mastodon people.

Problem is it’s not super stable and the federation doesn’t work too well…

permalink
report
parent
reply
148 points

Xodus*

permalink
report
reply
13 points

No they had it righ….oooh, i see what you did there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

𝕏odus

permalink
report
parent
reply
145 points

Yes, ‘X’ odus

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Movement of Jah people

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Oh yeah

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Great game

permalink
report
parent
reply
112 points

It amazes me how badly these billionares are at running businesses.

Like im an engineer and Not in my wildest dreams could I have destoyed a company like Twitter faster than musk.

Like Did he do it on purpose?

permalink
report
reply
69 points

It HAS to be on purpose. Nobody can get to billionaire levels of wealth and be completely inept, right? RIGHT?

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Begin rich makes one feel infallible. Thinking one’s self to be infallible leads to these kinds of decisions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s probably worse when one has convinced himself one’s suceess so far was 100% personal skill, rather than 90% luck and 10% skill.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Unfortunately, once you get enough money the system is designed to keep you wealthy no matter how much you fuck up.

Like, Trump has had multiple failed companies including casinos thay failed because he had them competeing with each other.

Yet while he’s probably not a billionaire he still has the status of “wealthy” and managed to fail into the most powerful position in government.

Musk had more money, and therefore can fuck up way harder and still be fine. He could burn Twitter to the ground for all the effect it would have on him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The reason is that they know people with money, and those people listen. For example, Musk only had to post about his attempt to buy Twitter in a groupchat, and he got Billions of Dollars from them to do it, unchecked. Regular people don’t get their ear, and even if they do for some unfathomable reason, everything is checked meticulously.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Lol i just cant imagine that level of ineptitude.

Am I living in a simulation?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The level of ineptitude is common, the combination of wealth and that much ineptitude, usually less so, given being able to afford the best education and advisers. So it takes a special sort of billionaire to be this inept.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s just the Dunning-Kruger effect at work, he thinks because he successfully ran a rocket manufacturing company to viability that he’s definitely going to be able to run a social media company too.

Turns out the B2B style government contract model isn’t exactly the same as B2C social media advertising model.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’d argue that it’s Drunning-Kruger plus being surrounded by stupid yes-men that agree with everything you say or do

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

His initial wealth of 42 million dollars came from working on travel software. He used that wealth to become rich by founding x.com, a payments company that failed. How does a failing company lead to massive wealth you might ask? Well, that failing company merged with PayPal.com, and Musk was CEO of the merged company for about 6 months before he got fired. PayPal went on to be huge, so after he was fired he made his fortune on his shares. Next he invested money in Tesla, bought the title of “co founder” even though he wasn’t, waited 7 years passively then noticed the company wasn’t going anywhere, replaced an exec or two and then took credit for turning the company around. So yeah, maybe that’s his end game? Make Twitter (now x.com) as bad as the old x.com so someone merges and gives him stocks and fires him again?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

And yet, despite all that, this somehow still feels notably inept, even for a man whose primary goal in life, at the moment, appears to be demonstrating how thin his attachment to reality grows by the day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Sounds like it’s time to re-watch Glass Onion. Elon Musk is Miles Bron.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It was on purpose. Its completely obvious the powerful right in America wanted Twitter gone. I bet it could have swung the overton window with how much influence it had.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Like Did he do it on purpose?

At this point, I’m gonna say yes. Yes, he did do it on purpose. Why? The conspiracy theorist in me says it’s to push people into Meta’s Threads, building it up even more before it federates, in an attempt to kill the Fediverse like Google did with XMPP, because the Fediverse is the fastest growing bastion of corporate-influence-free speech on the Internet.

Or he’s just an idiot. 🤷‍♀️

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

“Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by yadda yadda…”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah I’ve got a feeling this guy isn’t a master of 6D chess, planning some far flung strategy 10 steps ahead. I think he just likes to shitpost and cause drama

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Maybe that second one tho.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Like Did he do it on purpose?

I think this gives him credit where it isn’t due 😂

Personally, I think he’s just a magic blend of incompetent, arrogant, and in over his head. Large companies are slow moving for a reason and we’re seeing why in real time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Whether or not it’s on purpose, I think that Twitter was vulnerable to this outcome due to literally years of mismanagement. Dorsey hadn’t given a fuck for quite some time, and Twitter’s problems always grew faster than its solutions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Personally, I think he’s just a magic blend of incompetent, arrogant, and in over his head.

I know this is the Case. I am just amazed at how incompetent he is.

I’m mean if there were an incompetent olympics he would win silver (the highest possible medal).

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s like he has a bet that he had to destroy Twitter but he wasn’t allowed to just shut it down or kick everyone off.

Every move has been bad. It has to be on purpose. Is this how billionaires get their kicks?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The investors were the kind of people that don’t want the kind of on the ground, quick fact reporting that happened during uprisings and the like.

It can’t be a coincidence. They’re tanking the most popular tool for getting quick communication out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And at precisely the same time reddit goes down the shitter too. And threads. So many “coincidences.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If this is a Brewster’s Millions situation, and he just has to lose $44 billion dollars in a year, I’m voting we let the writers stay on strike.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I still think if you look at his investors it spells out leaders who want Twitter not to be viable as a platform for coordinating democratic efforts. So yes, he did it deliberately.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 553K

    Comments