DELANO, Calif. (AP) — “That ‘70s Show” actor Danny Masterson has been sent to a California state prison to serve his sentence for two rape convictions.

Authorities said Wednesday that the 47-year-old Masterson has been admitted to North Kern State Prison, and they released his first prison mug shot. The photo shows him wearing orange prison attire, with long hair and a beard.

164 points
permalink
report
reply
43 points
*

It will be more than 25 years before Masterson will be eligible for parole.

Masterson’s lawyers said they plan to

permalink
report
parent
reply
128 points

Aw hell nah the church of scientology assassinated this dude before they could finish their comment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

Scientology is just a

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Was nice of them to submit it though

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Appeal?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

No thanks, I just like the banana

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Take up gardening.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

nah, they just “plan to”. It’s easier to achieve something if you don’t say what you are going to achieve.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Indeed. My bad! 😶

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Rape bad, but damn that seems harsh. I don’t feel bad for him but was expecting 7-15 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

permalink
report
parent
reply

Orange Is The New Black but with the male cast of that 70s show

permalink
report
parent
reply

He looks like he smells like old beer and cigarettes

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Manson vibes

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Believe me as someone who’s had a mugshot taken it’s the lighting. It makes anyone look like a fuckin psycho and having resting bitch face doesn’t help

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Username checks out I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It was there. Click the arrow in the slideshow to reveal it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

If you’re trying to not get convicted of rape, the least you can do is to cut your hair and beard so you don’t look like a complete rapist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
94 points

Don’t worry Mila Kunis and Ashton Kutcher will bust you out

permalink
report
reply
111 points
*

Aston Kutcher, a celebrity famous for his philanthropy, says a man guilty of two rapes should have his charity taken into account.

In other words: A man with excess money, and who gives some of that excess to charity, says a person’s charity should balance out that person’s crimes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
109 points

I think it’s the personal connection that makes him find reasons to consider Danny’s side of things more charitably. I sort of accept that he is just a dumb Hollywood guy with a soft spot for a friend. Except for one thing…

He’s involved with fighting human trafficking which ought to give him a pretty clear perspective regarding sexual assault victims. That’s what I can’t reconcile.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Maybe he just doesn’t want to believe because he knew him for so long.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Could it be a shot at rehabilitation?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Involved in? You mean his accountant and manager got together and made a list of charities to give to that would be good for his image.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Let’s have some devils advocate! Everybody loves devils advocate. Just real quick before I start cooking, I just want to say that rape is bad and there’s no excuse. That’s important and I’m not going to use it in my examples. Murder though - that’s basically fine, I think.

A lot of crimes amount to one bad decision. A life of being a really good person and then one time you murder someone, then jail forever? (Well, yes, but actually no - first time offenders don’t get life in prison, even for murder.)

Even if you have a dark side that you’ve been keeping under wraps, that’s actually good! If there are people with dark sides, what we want is for them to not act on it - sociopaths, pedophiles - like, if we take for granted that these are conditions which occur in people and there’s no cure, what we want is for them to not act on it.

But, one day, you fail, your dark side gets out and you do one of the horrible things you’ve been trying not to do; then it’s easier to do it again, and again, and suddenly you’re a serial killer. 40 years of being good despite a very difficult challenge, to suppress that darkness, but the rest of your life, you’re judged for the few bad decisions you made in moments of weakness.

Let’s talk about Ebeneezer Scrooge. Tis the season after all.

That dude was a total dick for like 60 years, but, in the end of the story, he’s changed - it’s a redemption story. But his name, Scrooge, is a commonplace synonym which characterizes him as a villain; fuck his redemption, he lived most of his life as a dick, and we remember him that way.

So which is it? Do we judge based on most of their lives, or do we judge based on a recent set of decisions which severely depart from that? Or do we just go with whichever was worst?

When it comes to Ashton Kutcher, like, even a serial killer isn’t murdering literally every moment of their day. They have jobs, they go to the store. All that time, that person is being a good person, they’re suppressing their darkness. It’s easy to see a person in that light when that’s how you’ve seen them for basically your entire adult life.

That said, Ashton Kutcher is a rich TV star so basically all his opinions are invalid. He probably only helps victims of sex trafficking because his PR team thought it would be a good fit for his brand. Not to say he doesn’t like helping - I’m just saying fuck that guy. Fuck all those guys.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

“Well damn, Jackie, I can’t control the rapin’”

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I mean I personally feel most people like to think they’d immediately disown any friends that do stuff like this but I’d bet in reality a lot of people would do the same thing.

It’s a lot easier to pass judgment when you’re not emotionally involved. Same reason why people stay in abusive relationships. On the outside it’s cut and dry but sadly emotions are a thing.

I’m not defending Masterson nor am I saying Kutcher isn’t in the wrong by defending him. I’m just trying to bring to light that humans are emotional before they’re logical.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“Dude, where’s my moral center?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah. He’s had to look at reams of CASM as part of this for some reason. He also opposed encryption. He does these things for the children so that may might… Get unmolested? I don’t know. He’s kind of fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

If using a charity is something Ashton thinks you can use as a get out of jail free card, then what fucking shit does he do, he’s been helping with that anti sex trafficking thing, that’s a big ol get out of jail free card in Ashton’s mind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I really don’t like how much hate they got for this

If someone you love does something horrible, the emotions don’t just disappear. It’s like grief, people have to work through it, and it happens in different ways.

For them, their long time friend has done something to (for them) hypothetical victims. They asked for leniency in a non-public way…

It’s an extremely human thing to do. It doesn’t live up to their ideals, but it doesn’t invalidate everything they’ve done

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Well, what is Ashton hiding?

permalink
report
parent
reply

A person’s deeds are always relevant to sentencing.

If it was relevant to guilt, that would be obviously problematic. If it’s relevant to 25 years instead of 30, that’s fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Makes me think of a dark night in 2001…. 🤔

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Are those two on a speedrun to be the most unbearable couple?

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

To clarify, North Kern is an intake facility. He’ll be there for a few weeks undergoing psych evals and other testing to determine which facility he will be sent to for permanent incarceration.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

The one with tennis courts and a nice garden area?

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

HELLO WISCONSIN CONVICTION!

permalink
report
reply
24 points

he’s fucked, Prison sucks, but California Prison system really, really sucks

permalink
report
reply
4 points

i’ve heard the racial stuff is really intense… so you either end up an Aryan Nation type, or you end up being bitched out by everyone else…
but, since he’s rich and famous, he’ll probably get special treatment and be able to buy protection (like Jared Fogle)
i’ve also heard that prisoners all hate rapists

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

i’ve also heard that prisoners all hate rapists

Such noble creatures these prisoners are…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

not noble… but they tend to hate certain types of criminals more than others…

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 480K

    Comments