Experts say baby boomers will give more than $50 trillion to their heirs. But for many, health care costs will claim the bulk of that wealth.

The story goes that baby boomers are going to give tens of trillions of dollars to their heirs over the next few decades.

The “generational wealth transfer” has become a media fascination, both for its eye-popping size and because it might help younger generations as they face doubts about their financial security.

That shift is already in the works, and will continue for a couple of decades. According to wealth management firm Cerulli Associates, some $53 trillion will be passed down from boomers to their Gen X, millennial and Gen Z heirs, as well as to charities. That includes both gifts during their lifetimes and inheritances afterward.

But the overwhelming cost of health care for older people means most people in those later generations won’t inherit much, even if their elders seem well-off today.

164 points

Well, if Gen X and Millennials wanted their own fortunes they should have planned ahead like boomers and been born back when a house cost $7,500.

/sarcasm

permalink
report
reply
94 points

Lazy millennials can’t even be born on time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Pull yourself up by the bootstraps and travel back in time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Wait. What if these anonymous crypto whale accounts were created by future us shortly after we discovered time travel? We just don’t know we own them yet!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Great Scott!

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

Watching Married with Children and realizing this dude is working as a store clerk and supporting a family of 5 on that single wage without actually living paycheck to paycheck and then realizing this isn’t a fictional representation of the timeperiod, is really goddamn depresssing.

In less than 40 years the inequality of wealth distribution and the cost of living has changed so drastically that then they could live on one paycheck and now you only get by with a minimum of two.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

for those curious but lazy, married with children was started filming in 1987 and supposed to take place in schaumberg illinois, so historically those homes were 4x less expensive than today.

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=historical+home+value+Schaumburg+Il+in+1987

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Glad to see everyone in the family was counted

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah and in later seasons it was even 7 when the new kid came along and Peggy’s mom moved in with them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They made a point of representing Al as a half broke loser with a 30 year old car tho. You too can live like that if you leave the city

permalink
report
parent
reply
110 points

That’s because the real wealth transfer has been to the billionaires and close to billionaires.

Nothing will fix that short of a cyclical historic repetition of the French Revolution.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

100% this. Gentle reminder that Jeff Bezos now has 187 billion dollars. Billion!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

“Let them eat cake,” Bezos calmly sighed before a stray bullet from a sniper drilled him in the forehead, kicking off what would be the bloodiest revolution in US history in the past century.

permalink
report
parent
reply
97 points

I’m GenX. I’ve spent my entire life watching the Boomers fuck things up, then having to wade through the debris they leave in their wake.

I’m not expecting that to change now.

permalink
report
reply
37 points

GenX here as well. My mother died horribly of cancer when I was 13 and my father left about two weeks after her death and I was legally transferred to the State’s custody.

I’ve been told I’m “lucky” in that I’ll never have to shoulder my parent’s debt. So, you other people don’t know how lucky it was to be an orphan! But no really, a finical planner literally indicated to me that, THAT was a positive. And somehow that’s really colored my opinion on where we are as a society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

What do you mean by shoulder your parent’s debt? Do you live somewhere that debts can transfer to children?

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Yeah here in Tennessee we have filial laws that puts some of that debt that parents rack up on the backs of the children. TCA § 71-5-115.

permalink
report
parent
reply
93 points

Thank you every piece of shit asshole that bucks against the idea of universal healthcare. Fuck you a billion times over. Price gouging out of control capitalist bullshit

permalink
report
reply
-54 points

That has nothing to do with capitalism. Germany and UK are pretty capitalist (probably more capitalist than US) and yet they either have a functioning private medicine or a completely nationalised one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points
*

Lol “it’s not capitalism, because a nationalized healthcare is capitalism”

The profit motive of capitalist controlled entities is completely capitalism; it’s basically a textbook case of capitalism. Don’t fool yourself by saying the countries with more socialized healthcare are somehow more capitalist to the one that doesn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

Wut?

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Germany and the UK are demonstrably less capitalist than the US, both because they are social democracies with large, taxpayer-funded social welfare systems, and because their economies are significantly more regulated by both state policies and widespread labor unions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

I disagree.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Regulations are inefficiencies, because corporations with profit motive will of course make good decisions for everyone

permalink
report
parent
reply
-27 points

They do it all the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
89 points

Gen X here. I do not expect any inheritance at all.

And how much of this “fascination” with generational wealth transfer is actually companies salivating over potential profits?

permalink
report
reply
46 points

Elder millenial here. I expect no inheritance from my mom or grandparents and no social security. I’m one of the lucky ones though. My dad died ten years ago and left me just enough to make a down payment on a house.

The moral of the story is, give your parents cigarettes and hope the cancer kills them quick before the bills can pile up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Don’t believe the social security scare tactics. It’s always been a shell game. It isn’t some pile of money that runs out if we don’t pay into it. It is just another line item. Short of voting for it to die, it will be there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I hope you’re right but we will see. It would really suck to pay into a system your whole life and never get what you were promised.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They summoned a new inheritance tax over here, they sold it to us in the shape of: to get more taxes from the rich.

But those idiots don’t run around giving away money, they hand out businesses and stocks to their family or other assets.

So who are once again ending up paying even more money? Hmm? Yeah that’s right, if my dad manages to have some money left the goddamn tax criminals will gobble that up even though i probably need it to pay for his funeral.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Only 1 in every 500 Americans is affected by the inheritance tax.

Hmm? Yeah that’s right, if my dad manages to have some money left the goddamn tax criminals will gobble that up even though i probably need it to pay for his funeral.

You need more than $5 million to pay for a funeral? Because there won’t be any taxes on the first 5 million.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

If that’s in the US there’s a very good chance there’s not enough money in the estate or inheritance to trigger it. We’re talking in the several millions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

In the US the threshold is 13 mil before inheritance taxes kick in, so basically never.

The ultrarich still dont pay it here. The con they use is setting up a charity that they dump hundreds of millions into and then give their children outrageous lifetime salaries and full discretion to throw parties/events/travel/etc in the name of the “charity.” Since no one else actually donates, no one cares about how thr money is spent. They kids get the same ultra wealthy life style with none of the downsides, with media accolades and “Charitywashing” rarr rarrs to boot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Chances are, corporations are already plotting how to get the boomers to spend as much as possible before they pass away.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Shopping network and other 24/7 buy-over-the-phone television programming has already filched billions away from the silent generation by taking advantage of their cognitive decline. They just need to figure out what sticks with the Boomers now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So they’re going to sell fear and hate?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Same. Everyone I know who has boomer relatives doesn’t expect to get any inheritance. That goes for my wife and I as well. I don’t really mind personally. I’ve made a concerted effort to be self-sufficient and have never banked on getting a dime of inheritance. But I feel like too many in the media are setting a dangerous cultural trend where many people will falsely expect to get money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah I was disowned and my wife’s parents have made it clear nobody gets much

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t get how we blame the media for reporting on unprecedented things that economists are talking about. If someone thinks they are getting an inheritance because they heard boomers have a lot of money as a group, then that stupidity is on them, not on the media.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 522K

    Comments