3 points

is this common core?

if so its is teaching how unreasonable the world can be at least.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

It’s a pretty common problem in 4th/5th grade. I wouldn’t say it’s common core. It’s just making sure students know that to properly compare fractions the wholes need to begin as the same size.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

That teacher should be fired How can they be allowed to teach and fuck that up

permalink
report
reply
5 points

This is one of those problems that makes more sense with context. The teacher had the students working on “reasonableness”, which is essentially “does the question I’m asking make sense?”. The students were probably instructed to ignore actually trying to solve the problem when presented with one, but instead explain why the question either does or doesn’t make sense.

In this case the student potentially misunderstood the task. The failure on the teacher’s part is wording the question in such a way that it actually has a reasonable solution, and isn’t necessarily an unreasonable question.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This isn’t testing reasonableness. This is testing to see if a student understands that to properly compare fractions the wholes have to start as equivalent.

Source: I use questions similar to this every year because if I don’t get some real funky diagrams.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

But… you can totally compare fractions without the whole being equivalent. You just have to know the size of the wholes. It’s just a poorly phrased question that has more than one correct answer when only one was intended.

Edit: also, it’s totally testing reasonableness, that’s literally the title of the question. Still poorly phrased though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The feedback should look totally different if that was the case though

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The teacher doesn’t need to write all of that to get the point across. They can speak to them on the side and say, “remember when we worked on reasonableness last Tuesday?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Exactly! The answer the kid gave is the “correct” one because it shows a proper reasoning about fractions. While the teachers logic assumes that fractions are some kind of absolute value of measure???

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The teacher’s from another timeline where the “pizza” made it into SI as the standard unit of food area.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s what annoys me with marking that as wrong. The kid clearly understood the problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Teacher doesn’t know there’s more than one size of pizza I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

90% of these are faked for Internet points. Just like 99% of text message screenshots.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No internet points here

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No point in anything, man.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Nah, the kid’s right. Suppose Marty eats 4/6 of his pizza p1, and Luis eats 5/6 of his pizza p2, it means that for 4/6 p1 > 5/6 p2, p1 > (5/6)/(4/6) p2, which equals p1 > 5/4 p2

In other words, Marty’s pizza needs to be at least 25% larger than Luis’.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
1 point

Beautiful. I’m already clicking on magazines and being surprised that they exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Teacher never ate pizza, apparently.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Teacher always eats the entire pizza, that way they never have to worry about this problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 284K

    Comments