Kevin Hines regretted jumping off San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge the moment his hands released the rail and he plunged the equivalent of 25 stories into the Pacific Ocean, breaking his back.

Hines miraculously survived his suicide attempt at age 19 in September 2000 as he struggled with bipolar disorder, one of about 40 people who survived after jumping off the bridge.

Hines, his father, and a group of parents who lost their children to suicide at the bridge relentlessly advocated for a solution for two decades, meeting resistance from people who did not want to alter the iconic landmark with its sweeping views of the Pacific Ocean and San Francisco Bay.

On Wednesday, they finally got their wish when officials announced that crews have installed stainless-steel nets on both sides of the 1.7-mile (2.7-kilometer) bridge.

“Had the net been there, I would have been stopped by the police and gotten the help I needed immediately and never broken my back, never shattered three vertebrae, and never been on this path I was on,” said Hines, now a suicide prevention advocate. “I’m so grateful that a small group of like-minded people never gave up on something so important.”

Nearly 2,000 people have plunged to their deaths since the bridge opened in 1937.

City officials approved the project more than a decade ago, and in 2018 work began on the 20-foot-wide (6-meter-wide) stainless steel mesh nets. But the efforts to complete them were repeatedly delayed until now.

The nets — placed 20 feet (6 meters) down from the bridge’s deck — are not visible from cars crossing the bridge. But pedestrians standing by the rails can see them. They were built with marine-grade stainless steel that can withstand the harsh environment that includes salt water, fog and strong winds that often envelop the striking orange structure at the mouth of the San Francisco Bay.

112 points
*

How about instead of nets, we instead install a functioning mental health care system. This has ‘put bulletproof vests on school kids’ written all over it.

permalink
report
reply
44 points

Why not both haha. But yes I agree. 2k people killing themselves off this since it’s open is insane

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points
*

This says 4000 people died by suicide in California in one year. 2k people over almost 100 years isn’t crazy. These nets won’t make a dent in the yearly total.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Damn. We gonna need a lot more nets then

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The question is how many of those suicides were conducted by jumping off the bridge. And don’t say “they’d just choose another way to end themselves”. Studies and historical evidence shows that making suicide even slightly less convenient to perform actually does save lives. People get fixated on a method that seems easy. When that method is no longer easy, it gives them a chance to not go through with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Bulldoze the bridge and exterminate everyone.

No more suicides.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Judge Death approves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s the moral and environmentally friendly thing to do so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Why bulldoze the bridge if there aren’t any people left anyway? That sounds wasteful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

eh, but making this net prolly just makes them kill themselves in other (perhaps more harmful) places, like off train platforms and using guns

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Now ask yourself if we had proper quality healthcare for this, how many of those 2,000 would still be with us- vs. if we had nets.

I guarantee every one of them would have found another way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Oh no this is definitely true. I still would like to advocate for mental health services and better access for sure

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Mental health care, but also better wealth distribution/quality of living for everyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeah, all the mental health care in the world doesn’t mean jack shit when you’re living paycheck to paycheck your entire life.

Mental health care professionals and their shills will of course say otherwise, though.

It’s always about the money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

All the mental healthcare in the world doesn’t make the world a more acceptable living space.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

“Have you tried therapy?”

uhhhh, cheers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

“What colour do you want your dragon?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Rofl, make it a very hungry one please (that’s s colour, right?).

Actually, make it like an eco terrorist type of thing, just attaching random shit that is causing loss is various habitats & ecosystems around the world. That would be pretty cool, like gleefully look at the news ‘Let’s see what the unstoppable Dragonzilla destroyed balanced or rescued today.’

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

What about door kicking and room clearing during homeroom?

/s

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Also reminds me there’s a thing called “social safety net” (that each year becomes smaller and smaller)

permalink
report
parent
reply
83 points

The US government is going to do literally everything it can other than provide universal Healthcare until the country collapses.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

Wait you’re telling me this isn’t what they meant by safety nets??

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

The physical, not social kind. “We’ll catch you when you fall… this is not a metaphor.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I’m pretty sure California is in the process of implementing its own state-funded healthcare system.

It’s the way to do it, just like with legalizing drugs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

For real. It would be interesting to see the average financial depth of the people who attempt suicide in the US.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Nets are cheaper than mental health care.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

This reminds me of the time San Francisco decided to do something about it’s human-feces-in-the-BART-escalator-wells problem, not by making public restrooms available to unsheltered folk, but building stupid awnings to keep people from pooping inside. The awnings cost more than the toilets would have and people just pooped on the sidewalks instead. ℹ️🫶🌉😀

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Curious since I’m not familiar, how do the awnings prevent this? I went to SF a few years ago and there was a giant pile of human shit every 4 blocks so I’m not too surprised.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

They basically close off the street level entrance when the transit isn’t running. The escalators used to be open at the top and closed at the bottom during off hours, making a lovely little private pooping tunnel. The city budget people didn’t GAF about the bio hazard or human dignity issues, they just didn’t like that all the excrement kept breaking the escalators.

Old article from before they implemented them (the article mentions the budget proposal being $4 million, it’s turned into $64 million and counting).

https://thebolditalic.com/why-is-there-so-much-human-shit-on-the-streets-the-bold-italic-san-francisco-ccaecdc7512

Friedenbach balked at the canopy proposal. “I find it interesting that they’re spending this much money on canopies when they could be using it to keep their bathrooms open.” More so, the money could be used for keeping the high-traffic drop-in centers operational. A few years back, San Francisco, under former-mayor Gavin Newsom’s authority, sought to cut over a million dollars in funding for many of the city’s highest-traffic drop-in centers. The Coalition for Homelessness wouldn’t stand for it. “We’d already seen almost half of the centers close,” Friedenbach recalled, “so we figured out how many pounds of feces the public facilities kept off the street.” Friedenbach and company estimated that the cost of cutting back or getting rid of drop-in centers altogether would be over 58,000 pounds of human feces on the streets of San Francisco.

[…]

Regarding the four million dollars spent on the canopy proposal, Friedenbach said, “You could capture a large amount of feces [with bathrooms], instead of the one shit a night you might be staving off with this.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

This guy Friedenbach sounds like he knows his shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Old article from before they implemented them (the article mentions the budget proposal being $4 million, it’s turned into $64 million and counting).


$4 million for one canopy.

FTA:

The canopy, still in prototype form, would be designed and built over the next two years at a cost of almost four million dollars, with the first installation scheduled for 2015 at the 19th Street station in Oakland.


The project is expected to cost $4 million per entrance.

https://www.ktvu.com/news/bart-seeks-public-opinion-about-planned-improvements-for-sf-stations

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Odd, I lived in the Bay Area for years and never once saw a pile of human excrement in the city.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It must be a fairly recent phenomenon then. I was there in 2022 and it was quite sad to see the amount of people left homeless around the city.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Reminds me of that Bojack Horseman poem.

"But this is it, the deed is done silence drowns the sound. Before I leaped I should’ve seen the view from halfway down.

I really should’ve thought about the view from halfway down. I wish I could’ve known about the view from halfway down—"

permalink
report
reply
6 points

It’s a fucking amazing poem and had me in tears the first time I saw that episode.

People falling that 30 feet and being stopped in the act may help them see that jumping, or suicide in general is not the answer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

The weak breeze whispers nothing

The water screams sublime

His feet shift, teeter-totter

Deep breath, stand back, it’s time

Toes untouch the overpass

Soon he’s water bound

Eyes locked shut but peek to see

The view from halfway down

A little wind, a summer sun

A river rich and regal

A flood of fond endorphins

Brings a calm that knows no equal

You’re flying now

You see things much more clear than from the ground

It’s all okay, it would be

Were you not now halfway down

Thrash to break from gravity

What now could slow the drop

All I’d give for toes to touch

The safety back at top

But this is it, the deed is done

Silence drowns the sound

Before I leaped I should’ve seen

The view from halfway down

I really should’ve thought about

The view from halfway down

I wish I could’ve known about

The view from halfway down

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Great show.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points
*

Love the NIMBY ass “we don’t want effective barriers to keep people from jumping because then we cant see the view, so put in an invisible torture device that will horribly maim and punish people already so far gone they’ve decided to end it” approach. Really sums up San Francisco. Why don’t they just install a fucking Suicide Booth at each end of the bridge. They clearly aren’t after stopping attempts, they just don’t want to look at it. Easier to find a corpse in the human fishing net 20 feet down than trolling the bay.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Exactly. I’m sorry for their view, which is an undeniably beautiful view, isn’t as nice and I’m sorry that the historic bridge is less attractive now, but this is going to stop people from dying for fuck’s sake!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Some people would see the nets - a lifesaving device put there by the sheer force and willpower of a community who care so deeply about helping people survive their worst struggles that they pushed the powers that be to design, construct, and pay for it to be put in place and save human lives - and find that a really fucking beautiful sight.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I agree. But I don’t care if they think it’s the ugliest thing they ever saw. That’s beside the point.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 521K

    Comments