Rank-and-file members of both the House and Senate are paid $174,000 a year.

That probably seems like a decent amount of money, and it is: The median household income in 2022 was $74,580, according to the US Census.

But consider that members of Congress generally have to maintain two residences — one in Washington, DC, and one in their home state — and that they haven’t gotten a raise since 2009.

Inflation, meanwhile, has eaten away at the value of that salary over time: If lawmakers’ salaries had kept pace with inflation, they would be paid over $250,000 today.

Rep. Patrick McHenry, a North Carolina Republican who served as the interim speaker of the House following Kevin McCarthy’s ouster, told The Dispatch that congressional pay needed to be raised in order to attract “credible people to run for office.”

204 points

Let’s just build a big congressional dorm with furnished studio apartments and make them all live there when Congress is in session. It would save the government a fortune in cost of living reimbursements and security costs.

permalink
report
reply
72 points
*

You know genuinely I don’t understand why this isn’t a thing. It’s expensive to have two homes, especially when you aren’t even sure you’ll have the job for more than four years. It would lower the cost of entry into politics for people who do work minimum wage.

Shoving someone into a land full of surprise expenses seems like a perfect recipe for corruption.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

It would lower the cost of entry into politics for people who do work minimum wage.

It sounds like you understand perfectly well. Politics is for rich people to get more power, and get richer by granting favors to their friends. “Public servant” is the lie they tell to make us feel good about it.

Yes, I know that there are the few modest politicians, but it’s the exception to the rule.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They could also just have an apartment, they don’t need a mansion in Virginia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Even 2 apartments are expensive, I remember AOC was having trouble finding one in DC

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Congressional barracks or even a neighborhood would actually be a great idea. It could get its own metro line.

Like it’s a job with a lot of time there. I think it’s fair that they be able to comfortably live there with their spouses and other loved ones, but it would be good to keep housing centralized to them. I’m reminded of Air Force neighborhoods where I grew up. Sometimes your aimless walk would get you a conversation with someone holding a machine gun because there are medium security off base residences

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Matt Gaetz would organize a panty raid. I guarantee it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I had toyed with the idea of putting cameras all over the building and charging to view them…

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I remember an election or two ago a story about a freshman congressman having to sleep on a cot in his office because he couldn’t afford DC rent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Maybe they should do something about the out of control rent prices lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Make it a munger dorm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

There would be the added perk of people not wanting to remain congress critters for more than a couple of terms unless they really care about the job

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

A bunch of them sleep in their office already. Worst kept secret in Washington. Dorms would be an upgrade.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I was also thinking the extremely wealthy wouldn’t want to tolerate living without the luxury they are used to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Squid games dorm

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Put them in government housing on welfare with Medicaid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Many members of Congress already sleep in their office (which is technically against building codes). Dorms would be an improvement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Great idea. And we have so much unused real estate the government owns in DC if they didn’t force people to return to the office.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s a version of Big Brother I’d definitely watch. At least the first season.

permalink
report
parent
reply
130 points

Maybe they should skip their avocado toast or drink less Starbucks?

permalink
report
reply
37 points

Something something bootstraps

permalink
report
parent
reply
118 points

If inflation has eaten away at your 6 figure salary that hasn’t been updated since 2009 imagine how the plebs making $7.25/hr feel.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

They should make the salary a multiple of the federal minimum wage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They have to have two houses, one in Washington, and one in their home district. Washington is an extremely high cost of living area. This is a time when $175k really doesn’t go as far as it sounds.

But yes, raise the minimum wage, too, because $7.25/hour doesn’t go far anywhere under any circumstances.

permalink
report
parent
reply
97 points

Tie their pay to a multiplier of the minimum wage.

permalink
report
reply
40 points

And don’t give them the authority to change the multiplier number.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

And make the multiplier 1.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Under paying is a good way to make sure that the only people who run for office have financial incentives outside of the salary. Ie: it makes corruption and insider trading more likely.

I would say we should pay them enough to have a solidly comfortable upper middle class lifestyle in perpetuity, and force them to relinquish all prior assets and holdings beside their family home/vehicles. Ideally, these would be highly respected community members and making the comfortable would be commendable. However, they should not be able to leverage their position for personal gain. That should be true after their tenure as well. They should be given a sizeable pension, but any earning related to their office should be forfeit to an approved non-profit. That means speaking engagements and book deals should not be a source of income.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Also don’t pay them if they aren’t working. Fuck this whole BS with abstaining vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

minimum wage, and their wages, and almost everything else they deal with should be indexed to COL or the relevant stat. why we keep using static numbers eludes me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
89 points

Id be significantly more open to this if you assholes hadn’t spent the last 50 years helping steal money from the poor for billionaires.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 480K

    Comments