His claims are quickly debunked in the article, as the true reason is, obviously, protecting their IP and subscription model

9 points

The only obvious solution to this new threat is to add certificates to their cartridge chips. And if you don’t use up your signed cartridges within the year that the cartridges had valid certificates, that’s really on you. Also, since we’re so worried about security on our ink cartridges, I’d like to be charged an extra $5 per cartridge if I’d like to register them with McAfee. /s

Also, maybe HP should consider that putting words and images on dead trees is only being accelerated towards its grave by their greedy practices.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

surely for some small fee I can refresh the cartridge chip certificate

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That feature will only be enabled after extensive “research” following the “Crushed Grandma Landfill Disaster of 2135.” A tragedy in which the massive landfill of unused ink cartridges shifts and engulfs an entire city block, crushing one grandmother to death.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

We paid researchers to determine if Grandmas can be crushed by mountains of third-party ink cartridges

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Sustainability of a business strategy? But wouldn’t that cost them those sweet short term gains?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Then dont make them with chips 🤦‍♂️

permalink
report
reply
24 points

every once in a while they’ll just tell you how stupid they think you are. don’t ever forget it.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

This has real “Home Taping is Killing Music” vibes.


But god damn do these corporate vultures really think that we owe them something.

No, this is a financial transaction. I am buying a product from you, and once I have paid you, I owe you nothing more. Endless attempts to make your business model endlessly extractive from your customer base just shows you have shitty business management skills and don’t know how to grow your business outside of nickel-and-diming people to death.

permalink
report
reply
13 points
*

The mad rush to sell the sizzle, not the steak.

Wouldn’t it be nice to have one company create a simple printer that just prints. It does not have a local webpage. It does not monitor your ink supplies. It does not phone home. It uses ink from bottles sold inexpensivly.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

The last point does exist, those printers are just more expensive because they are no loss leaders and no ink sales are expected.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Would be less hassle to just fucking 3d print a page

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@beehaw.org

Create post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 2.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 82K

    Comments