232 points

Yes, I’m unapologetically pro-life. … I am fine with a federal law

Ladies and gentlemen, this is your “moderate” Republican candidate.

permalink
report
reply
80 points

I mean, that IS moderate for a Republican. The more typical party view is Make America Handmaid’s Tale.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Their point is that that’s only moderate by today’s standards. It wasn’t 20 or 30 years ago. But like they said, “MODERN” republican

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It looks like both of the people referred to moderate but as to your point about modern, I wonder if there has been that much of a change in the last 20-30 (or 50 or 100) years as much as perhaps modern technology providing a louder megaphone, and as a result greater “reward” for being more and more–outlandish–to put it politely?

permalink
report
parent
reply

I don’t usually wish for this, but I hope she gets an ectopic pregnancy and is forced to carry to term

Realistically she’d just fly herself to NY

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I don’t wish that pain and suffering on anyone. Ever her terrible ass.

That said, she’s 100% the type of person that would get the medical care, and never mention it on the trail, and continue to try and win over the nuts who want a ban.

She already lies to her base in order to get votes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

That’s okay, I’ll wish hard enough for both of us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Some people deserve bad things to happen to them no matter how unethical it is to wish for, or do. Unethical maybe, but justified entirely. Our society is up against the clock on ecological and social issues and being ethical in the current system will not save it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

I think that is their point

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Of the party of freedom!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t like to play devil’s advocate, but there is a sliver of light between “I am fine with” and “I will push for” a federal law. Both terrible stances given the makeup of this country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
145 points

Stockholm Syndrome is the only explanation for women continuing to support Republicans

permalink
report
reply
137 points
*

There were anti suffrage women’s groups.

There were pro-Nazi Jewish people in Germany until they came for them too.

There’s always some people within a population who just choose to side with power, even power that loathes them, in hopes they’ll become a favorite pet.

The log cabin Republicans come to mind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Famously, Mother Jones didn’t believe in women’s suffrage. She believed it was a distraction from class warfare.

I tend to align more with Simone de Beauvoir who saw women as a disadvantaged class as well. I think it’s a helpful lens for how we consider gender dynamics and patriarchal structures.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Agreed. And if I can just add as to point out the fluid dynamics of modern post-constructionalism as seen through the lens of and espoused by such pioneering women as Marjorie Jacqueline Bouvier-Simpson.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The pro Nazi Jews are actually kinda funny in a horrifically dark way

They even had a chant! “Down with us! Down with us!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

What about women running as republicans?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Especially women running as Republicans

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The word you are looking for is “pick-me”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

No it’s not.

They genuinely believe that only bad people need abortions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Only bad people get raped?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-46 points

Um, what about the belief that an unborn fetus has a soul? That’s a belief that tens of millions of American women sincerely hold…

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

That belief is unsupported by scripture, but even if it was, religious beliefs should not be the basis for federal law.

If you believe an unborn fetus has a soul, don’t have an abortion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Let me preface this by saying that I am 100% pro-choice, and that I agree with the spirit of your comment, but…

This argument doesn’t work. It’s like saying “if you believe in the value of human life, don’t go on a murder spree.”

These people legitimately believe that aborting a fetus is just as wrong as killing a child/adult, and that it is their moral duty to prevent all types of murder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points
*

Wrongly, because the Bible not only doesn’t condemn it but actually gives instructions on how to perform one. (Numbers 5:11-31)

Also, souls haven’t been proven to exist, so it’s kind of moot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

They are welcome to hold any religious beliefs they want, but they have no right to force others to adhere to that belief.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Which is the crux of the issue. Nobody is forcing them to have an abortion, they’re forcing other people to not. It’s non of their business what other people do with their own body.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*

Even allowing for the unproven assertion that souls exist, at no point does that soul obligate giving up bodily autonomy.

You can’t use organs from corpses without permission, you can’t force a drunk driver to provide an organ to a kid they ran over, you can’t force a parent to donate an organ to their own child. All of these things would save “souls” but is hardly part of pro-forced birth platforms.

And if fetuses have souls, that would surely make the Christian god the true murderer as 10 to 20% of all pregnancies end in miscarriages, but the Christian god is held to a lower moral standard than human beings by pro-forced birthers. And the governments that reject welfare programs are also held to lower moral standard for some reason, as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

You don’t need to agree with the women who oppose abortion because they believe a fetus has a soul in order to accept that these women do in fact oppose abortion because they believe a fetus has a soul. I’m not arguing that they’re right but only that they have their reasons, which they aren’t secretive about. People who wonder “how could women vote for Republicans” are ignoring the straightforward explanation that those women readily provide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Religious beliefs are irrelevant outside of the personal life.

Most people don’t even follow their religion RAW. Bunch of munchkins running bullshit homebrew rulings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

It’s stupid and completely unfounded in any medical science regarding when the Fetus is actually a living human being.

Show me a woman who claims she genuinely would see a fetus in a jar and an infant newborn as equally worth saving in a crisis and I will show you a woman who swears she’d have totally been a punk rock abolitionist if she was around in the South in the antebellum years.

Also it literally isn’t sincere belief, the Bible has exactly one thing to say about abortion, and that’s how to perform one via medicine.

God gaveth unto the Jews, the pill.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s a belief they have only because they were told to believe it. I can’t respect that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

People like to forget that we live in a country with a huge deeply religious population, and that women are more likely to be anti abortion than men are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I’m totally okay with those people thinking abortion is wrong and not getting then. I’m not okay with it when those people try to force their ideals on my niece or my sister.

I’d be just as not okay with it if the situation was reversed and we were somehow requiring women to get abortions for whatever reason. Just stay the fuck out of people’s medical decisions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

“Mrs. Haley, have you ever had an abortion? You have a daughter. Has she ever had an abortion?” – The press, if they had any balls.

permalink
report
reply
47 points

She would say no regardless of the truth. Asking questions like that without knowing the answer and being able to prove it is basically just tossing a softball.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

A little bit of investigative reporting can work to find out if it is a lie. Getting her on record is step one. They won’t even go to step one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Never ask a question in that setting where you don’t already know the answer. Step one is doing the investigation and then get them on record.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

It’s a medical procedure, so it’s protected under HIPAA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Seriously. The way they treat all the candidates with kid gloves is ridiculous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

She could say, “Yes I have had many abortions. I’m having one tomorrow! Abortions should be illegal because it’s the only way to stop me from constantly having abortions!”

Hypocrisy doesn’t matter to them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

Asking her is fine, leave all politicians kids out of the spotlight (unless they are campaigning).

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Sorry, that was thrown out the window when Rush Limbaugh went after Chelsea Clinton. And it really went out the window when the entire Republican media sphere went after Sasha and Malia Obama.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And it was wrong then and remains wrong now. Kids can’t help who their parents are, leave them out of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

The sociopaths were rude so I get to act like a sociopath argument really doesn’t sit well

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

“I am going to step on this rake again and again, harder and harder, until the rake no longer slaps me in the face when I step on it.”

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Sideshow Bob, surrounded by abortion rakes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I mean, she is kind of a sideshow in the Trump Circus

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

If she weren’t a degenerate buffoon, she wouldn’t be campaigning as a Republican.

Anyone who still identifies themselves with the ® in this day and age can be written off as an idiot and bigot…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

She can put coherent sentences together, and I would love to elect a woman, but we are even more misogynistic than racist. Also, I’m waaaay far to the left of democrats, so nope.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What else can they do? They have to win the primary before they can compete in the general election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points
*

You ever get the feeling that certain people are anti-abortion simply because they want neglected, sad children to grow up and become ignorant, angry adults that will vote to give sociopaths, narcissists and psychopath power?

The Dominionists say yes…

permalink
report
reply
7 points

The anti-abortion sentiment is very tightly bound up in the white nationalist / supremacist narrative. A lot of the same folks who say they want to ban women from having abortions are the same ones who endorse sterilizations, harden their hearts toward public healthcare for minorities, and scream all the live-long-day about Anchor Babies.

The theory of the anti-abortion activist is always that the wrong fetuses are getting terminated. This ties back to old blood libels against Jews, Satanic Panics, and other conspiracy theories that orbit the “Great Replacement” Theory of lower-than-average white replacement level procreation.

And in the last decade, as domestic maternity rates have fallen and hysteria around Arabs, Latinos, Africans, and the Dreaded China Menace has peaked, we’re seen a lot more Scientific Racism that gears itself around the need for a revitalization of the White Race as a prelude to some kind of future apocalyptic global struggle for power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

*anti-abortion

But also those same people would like orphans to be raised by private Christian organizations (and limit adoption to Christian nuclear families), so I would say they would also like those children to be raised Christian to reinforce their religious theocracy

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Also, desperate, neglected, unwanted children have less of a chance of going to college and pursuing “better” career opportunities later in life. Theres just too much stress associated with the simple act of living. They’ll always have to rely on the state for assistance, which means they’ll always be driven to work the jobs no one wants for a pittance, just to be able to survive.

Make no mistake, the anti abortion politicians aren’t doing this out of any “respect for life” or whatever, they just want to keep the working class populated, so they can keep making money off the backs of an uneducated, exploited population.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m pretty sure that is one of the biggest reasons for Republicans to be anti abortion.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 438K

    Comments