The Associated Press, Reuters, and Agence France-Presse all released kill notifications to media outlets over the photo — released by Kensington Palace on Sunday — announcing that they would no longer be distributing the image.

The AP wrote, “it appears that the source has manipulated the image.” AFP cited an “editorial issue,” while Reuters said the photo was withdrawn after a “post-publication review.”

Following its release, social media was abuzz with sleuths questioning whether the photo was photoshopped or AI-generated. Many were focused on the cuff of Princess Charlotte’s pink cardigan, which appears to disappear in the photo.

Other users pointed out that Middleton was not wearing her wedding ring.

“no rings, kids all have their fingers crossed, weird blurring on charlotte’s cuffs, leaves on the trees despite it being early mach - i’m sorry but they’re just asking for us to go full katespiracy at this point,” one user on X wrote.

90 points

Okay, I thought the conspiracy theories were kinda silly at first. But now, even though I don’t care about Kate Middleton or any of the royal family, I gotta admit I’m kinda curious now.

permalink
report
reply
48 points
*

There is nothing to the conspiracy theories, she’s had abdominal surgery and wants to keep her health problems private. The UK press are intrusive and horrible, and the social media conspiracy theories are just gossiping.

There are plenty of operations that would need a couple weeks of hospital recovery and about 6 weeks recovery at hone (Easter is only the end of March). People speculating are ignorant about basic medical matters and can’t let someone have their privacy. There is no conspiracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Is it really that difficult to just not post a picture then? I mean, I’ve managed to go 40 years without posting any pictures to social media, and I’m not even a princess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

She had a breakdown, that’s what’s being hid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

And your evidence is?

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Yeah, this is getting pretty weird.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

How are they so bad at this?!

permalink
report
reply
41 points

It’s so bad it’s like they’re trying to inflate the attention on the royal family. I can’t think of what they would gain from this type of attention, though… Other than to keep them relevant in the minds of the public and media, in the cheapest way possible?

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points
*

I think they were trying to shut down the rumour mill as to why Kate hasn’t been seen in months. Probably figured releasing a “photo” would do the trick. Little did they know there’s a worldwide network of researchers checking photos for just this kind of thing.

Palace staff f’ed up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

“What do me mean what can we do? Just hire a photoshop expert from fiver.com. Do I have to do everything for you?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I can tell from some of the pixels, and from seeing quite a few shops in my time.

- Worldwide network of researchers

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

a worldwide network of researchers

It doesn’t take a photoshop expert to notice something off.
The tree in the background has leaves on it, in early march.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

What’s happening? I don’t keep up on British conspiracy theories.

permalink
report
reply
63 points

From reading the article, she hasn’t been seen since Christmas and there were theories that she was in a coma or something.

Then a photo of her gets finally released, and it appears to be digitally pieced together.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The kids have also not been seen afaik and are not attending school.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points
*

Look at the boys hand on the left too.

permalink
report
reply
43 points

I’ve seen Dune 2, this is just him telling the housekeeper to bring more biscuits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

the voice BRING ME MORE TEA

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I’m going to be the pedantic person I guess.

The voice isn’t really the same as the force, making people do something. It’s a kind of emotional manipulation. The Bene Gesserit are highly in tune with emotions, and they have learned to examine people and say things in a way that they can’t refuse. Jessica (and Paul to an extent) in the movie just have magic powers it seems, but the others it’s more clear what’s going on. Like when Paul is doing his speech to turn the Fremen into his followers, he’s reading them emotionally and manipulating them. (Paul is also a Mentat in the books, so he’s really good with logic too and that plays a role as well.)

Sorry to be the book person. I hope this was interesting enough to justify ruining the joke.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Little over-energetic kids do weird finger stuff sometimes when trying to hold still. But the older two also, it does look like something kids might do to protest a sham picture that lies about their mum. The lack of a wedding ring also feels significant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I’m an adult and I still do weird stuff with my fingers. I absolutely cross my fingers like that.

conspiracy theorists gonna conspiracy I guess

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think he’s throwing up his gang sign. This motherfucker’s a crip.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

My middle finger has never bended in that way, and I thing with the tendons being the way they are, curling your pointer in while crossing your ring would be… impressive…

I suspect that they used AI to edit out something like a toy or whatever, and failed to notice.

In any case, fidgety kids is why you take dozens of shots, whoever released that photo wasn’t paying attention

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah, but the ring finger is all wrong. Its base doesn’t line up with the rest of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

It is more subtle, but it looks like both of the other two children are crossing fingers as well. The boy in the middle seems to possibly be crossing his middle and ring fingers on his left hand and the girl is definitely crossing the same two fingers on her right hand. And Kate’s blurry hand on the kid’s waist makes little sense when nothing around it is motion blurred, unless, I guess, maybe she was yanking it away at the moment the photo was taken? But it seems like if that was the case the wrinkle/ fold in his shirt right in front of her hand would be moving too and not be as crisp as it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The common denominator is the ring finger, and she’s not wearing her ring.

If I may put on mg tinfoil hat for a moment, those kids are obviously trying to tell everyone the person in the photo is not their mother, and is in fact a cloud person from Alpha Centauri.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

The only true giveaway is the girl’s left sleeve (our right) which has some erased parts (where it meets the hand). Everything else might be weird but no way to confirm, however that sleeve is 100% edited no doubt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not sure where you found this photo, I clicked a bunch of the links looking for the full photo and gave up. I did notice that only the kid closest to the window actually has a reflection though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Maybe we can solve this like when Reddit solved the Boston Marathon bombing

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Trueblood Royals don’t have reflections. That kid is the new Harry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Its in the linked article near the bottom in a twitter embed. https://x.com/bencsmoke/status/1766838218425544804?s=46&t=Za25Alq_B_cAQOySmPLDCg

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

This is Business Insider’s front page right now including this story on the right (which it is also complaining about on the left). It’s really weird. Who exactly are they trying to appeal to, bankers who read the National Inquirer?

permalink
report
reply
18 points

What a fucking tabloid mess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

But a really weird one, right?

Like you wouldn’t expect a tabloid to have a bunch of financial news and you wouldn’t expect a financial news source to have a bunch of tabloid stuff.

They’re a big company. They must have market research people. So what is the demographic they’ve found that makes this make sense?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

BI has been doing tabloid-level journalism for a long time now, this doesn’t seem out of character for them at all. I’m sure their market research is entirely focused on maximizing engagement workout any concern about their reputation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

SO weird. You make a very good point… is there some tabloid reader/business person overlap somewhere? Like, a huge one that’s invisible to normal people?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Perhaps the customers are CEOs of AI companies who might want to sell the royals better deepfake technology?

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 409K

    Comments