The House on Wednesday passed a bill with broad bipartisan support that would force TikTok’s Chinese owner to either sell the hugely popular video app or be banned in the United States.

Republican leaders fast-tracked the bill through the House with limited debate, and it passed on a lopsided vote of 352-65, reflecting widespread backing for legislation that would take direct aim at China in an election year.

166 points

Sketchy Chinese data brokers: 👎
Sketchy US data brokers:👍

Signed, Congress.

permalink
report
reply
60 points
*

The Chinese data brokers don’t “gift” congresspersons “campaign funds”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

They quite literally are. Just not enough to pay for the influence liability that Tik Tok is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Does that mean it’s just the Russian ones that do?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Russian apps got banned with this bill too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

lol yep. we constantly talk about how horrible tik tok is but the US government who is, of course, a much bigger threat to US citizens is doing the exact same thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It would arguably take less effort to write a more general ban on apps and companies sharing, selling, and aggregating data on users than one specifically carving out foreign-owned companies.

Not doing that makes it clear this isn’t a “first step.” This is a blanket approval of the practice, but with “election year, China bad” thrown in.

Yes, any government access to user data can, and will, be mis-used, including Tik Tok. Opposing this bill isn’t an approval of Bytedance, it’s an opposition to the process.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

I simply don’t agree that kind of power is more acceptable in the hands of a country like China

Nobody said that Tiktok is more acceptable, just that the American ones that are given free rein are just as unacceptable.

Come to think of it, though, the American ones are a bigger threat, simply by virtue of spying on a larger userbase than Tiktok currently has.

And if you think the likes of Facebook, Twitter and Google aren’t beholden to foreign governments such as the ones of India, Israel and yes China too, just because they’re headquartered in the US, you clearly don’t know much about how they operate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

No. Because that’s not how politics works. This will be sold as a solved problem and the second you try to lobby to ban Facebook from selling data and ad space to the CCP the line will suddenly be about government interference in business.

Swallowing bullshit like this is part and parcel of corporate governance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I would argue that this is the opposite order. You want to take care of the people who actually hold power over you now, China has no power over you.

Look at what the eu has done. First control and regulate the local companies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

in the meantime STOP USING these companies products.

Can you share this list? I didn’t know we had a definitive answer on everything to avoid that the united states government is using to spy on its citizens. Not sure how I missed that, its kinda big news that we got something that definitive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yep but they’re more powerful and more selfish.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Makes sense. They can control one and can’t control the other.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They can control are controlled by these and can’t control the other.

Fixed that for you

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t think they’ll actually control either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Shutting down TikTok on US soil for 99% of people is trivial to execute and sufficiently effective.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If China wants my private data they are going to have to buy it from a third party like everybody else!

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Straight up using Chinese tactics of forcing a company to be majority domestic owned.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

The legality of foreign ownership should absolutely be bilateral. I don’t get why this wasn’t the policy from the start.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Because that’s “communism”. America has gone after countless countries for preventing foreign ownership of goods and services.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Uncle Sam is upset that they can’t spy on you. Uncle Sam wants you to use Instagram.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Uncle Sam wants to get his fingers into that sweet, sweet algorithm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

can’t believe people’s insanely smug reaction to this. the government is banning an app that 100+ million americans use and presumably enjoy. that is insane, full stop.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

This is how bad the trade war and propaganda has gotten.

I have no hope for this nation or the useful idiots that inhabit it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The government also bans drugs, guns, alcohol, smoking, etc. They ban things that are perceived threats to health and safety. It’s what they should be doing.

That being said, wasting their time on TikTok is fucking stupid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Ah yes. Banning alcohol.

That went really well.

Ah yes. Banning drugs.

That’s going really well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Nothing you’re saying is arguing the point…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They aren’t banning a thing, they are banning a kind of a thing.

If they were banning social media you may have a point, they aren’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Government bans drugs to imprison POC.

Government doesn’t ban guns unless POC own them. If you are white you get a license to kill.

Government doesn’t ban alcohol a century ago it banned poor people from having it safely.

Government never banned smoking. It makes them too much money.

Stop pretending that they give a shit. If they did we would have like freaken free fruit a veg stands on every block and cars would be speed limited.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Land of the free

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

It’s also unconstitutional. But when’s the last time anyone heard the words, “Bill of Attainder”? There’s a fairly good chance TikTok takes this to court and wins.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Does the Constitution apply to foreign companies? I thought it doesn’t even apply to non-residents that are not on U.S. soil.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It lays out the powers of our government. And it specifically says Congress can’t pass a Bill of Attainder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

It’s not like there’s no reason to it. Don’t be so dramatic. You can waste time on YouTube shorts, Instagram, snapchat etc…

Rather not have genocidal dictatorships programming us

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Do you live in the us?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

So pass a bill banning that. And punish all data vendors when they break it, instead of unconstitutionally targeting one of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Israel (at least in large part) is why they’re pushing the tiktok ban now. It is a little hard to connect the dots on this because the China-reasoning seems strong on the surface. I agree that China is bad, but there has not been any stellar evidence to show that China censors or otherwise manipulates users on the platform. You can easily go to tiktok and find videos discussing how awful the Chinese government is, information about tiananmen square, Winnie the Pooh jokes, etc. In comparison, the data that came out of the Facebook and Cambridge Analytica scandal was far more concrete, and Congress did nothing. Certainly there were not 81% of house members coming together to force Facebook to sell. Tiktok has even offered to make major concessions about data privacy.

Israel’s war in Gaza is deeply unpopular and the fascists in Israel and here in the US are concerned that they are losing popularity. Tiktok has 100+ million active users in the US and the heaviest anti-Israel sentiment (the government and the US’s relationship with the Israeli government, not the Israeli/Jewish people) is heaviest on Tiktok, which is dominated by young millennials and gen Z. This is leaked audio of the director of the anti-defamation league (a very pro-Israel organization) speaking about this. He basically tells his audience that they have a “major major major… problem” and specifically says that they have a “tiktok problem and a gen Z problem.” Listen to the audio- you can agree or not with his reasoning, but he’s essentially saying that the spread of ideas on tiktok is causing their polling issues.

People like this want to stop the spread of ideas on tiktok because young people are organizing, boycotting, and putting dents in the system. They do not like that young voters are having a larger and larger influence. These young people are also boycotting major companies like McDonalds and Starbucks who have taken pro-Israel stances, and these companies have lost profits from this. All this to say - I don’t think there is any lack of motivation by people with lots of money to destroy the platform where these people are organizing.

It is incredible how much money Israel pumps into our politicians, both Democrats and Republicans. Joe Biden himself is the largest recipient of this money. There are anti-BDS laws (specifically for Israel) in 37 states. I don’t think many people are aware of just how much influence Israel has in the US. It is surprising and disturbing, but I am equally surprised/disturbed at how little attention these topics have received on Lemmy of all places. I don’t think it takes a genius to start making these connections and to start asking questions - maybe this isn’t the full picture but there is a lot of stuff here to be skeptical about. That said, I absolutely do think this kind of information is suppressed on other platforms, and they want to suppress all of tiktok because it’s dangerous to them.

permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

I don’t think it takes a genius to start making these connections and to start asking questions

That’s correct.

Jan 2023 - EXPLAINER: List of states banning TikTok grows

Jan 2023 - These Colleges Just Banned TikTok

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 262K

    Comments